Download the AOL News Toolbar
Our new toolbar integrates latest news into your Web browser and installs in seconds. Download it now!
Send Us Feedback
News Video
Find, view and share videos about news and entertainment from around the Web.
See Videos »

News Alerts

The latest updates sent straight to your inbox.

Get AOL News Alerts »

Australia Discovers 3 New Dinosaurs

By ROD McGUIRK
,
AP
posted: 124 DAYS 6 HOURS AGO
comments: 366
filed under: ,
Text SizeAAA
CANBERRA, Australia (July 4) - Scientists have confirmed for the first time that Australia was once home to a dinosaur that was big, fast and terrifying, and they've named it like something from an Arnold Schwarzenegger movie. Meet the Australovenator.
The beast was a 1,100 pound meat-eating predator with three slashing claws on each of its powerful forelimbs that stalked the Outback 98 million years ago, researchers said in a report published Friday.
Skip over this content
Fossilized remnants of its limb bones, ribs, jaw and fangs were found — along with bones of two other new species of gigantic, long-necked herbivores weighing up to 22 tons — in Queensland state over the past three years.
The discovery, analyzed in a 51-page report published in the peer-reviewed online science journal PLoS ONE, was the first substantial find of large dinosaurs in Australia to be revealed in 28 years.
Paleontologists have described Australia as new frontier in vertebrate paleontology and an untapped resource in the world's understanding of the dinosaur age because so few fossils have been found there. This is largely because the relatively flat continent has long been geologically stable. The movement of tectonic plates in other continents has forced layers of rock bearing fossils tens of millions of years old to the surface making them easier to find.
In the latest Queensland find, paleontologists bulldozed top soil more than three feet deep to expose the sandy clay that held the fossils.
The finders nicknamed the 16-foot long carnivore, Australovenator wintonensis, "Banjo," after the poet A.B. "Banjo" Paterson who in 1885 penned Australia's unofficial anthem "Waltzing Matilda" on a sheep ranch near Winton — a cattle town that lies closest to where the dinosaur bones were found. Banjo's Latin name means "Winton's Southern Hunter."
"The cheetah of his time, Banjo was light and agile," the report's lead author, Scott Hocknull, a Queensland Museum paleontologist, said in a statement.
"He's Australia's answer to Velociraptor, but many times bigger and more terrifying," Hocknull added, referring to the turkey-sized prehistoric predators recreated with artistic license in the "Jurassic Park" movies.
The other two finds — 52-foot-long herbivores — were previously unknown types of titanosaur, the largest dinosaurs that ever lived. The giraffe-like Wintonotitan wattsi and nicknamed Clancy translates from Latin as "Watts' Winton Giant." The Diamantinasaurus matildae resembled a hippopotamus and has been nicknamed Matilda; the Latin name translates as "Matilda's Diamantina River Lizard."
All three lived in the mid-Cretaceous period which extended from 145 million years to 65 million years ago.
Matilda's and Banjo's bones were mingled; Hocknull suspects Matilda became stuck in river mud and that Banjo fell into the same fatal trap while moving in for the kill.
"The jewel in the crown for us is Banjo because it's the most complete meat-eating dinosaur ever found in Australia," Hocknull said.
"All of the carnivorous dinosaurs that we've had in the past were only known from a single bone or tooth," he added.
John Long, a Museum Victoria paleontologist who was not connected with the find, said it was "very exciting stuff."
Long said the last "truly big" dinosaur found in Australia was the partial skeleton of a 30-foot-long herbivore named Muttaburrasaurus which was found near the Queensland town of Muttaburra in 1981.
Long said only single large dinosaur bones had been found since then.
"This is the first time we've got partially articulated skeletons," Long said. "There is enough of the bones to reconstruct them quite confidently."
"We know so little about the Australian dinosaur fauna that any major paper like this is a massive advance on our previous knowledge," he said.
Hocknull said his team would continue unearthing more bones of the three dinosaurs as well as other sites in the Winton area, where fossil bones have been found scattered on the surface since the 1930s.
Skip over this content
Copyright 2009 The Associated Press. The information contained in the AP news report may not be published, broadcast, rewritten or otherwise distributed without the prior written authority of The Associated Press. Active hyperlinks have been inserted by AOL.
2009-07-03 07:28:13

Related Articles

  1. See More Related Articles and Blog Posts
(366)
Sort by:

1 - 10

DRosent288

02:27 AMJul 17 2009

Both "Clancy" and brontosaurus--more properly called apatosaurus belong to alarge grouping of dinosaurs called sauropods, characterized by huge bodies,massive pillar-like legs, grotesquely long necks with tiny heads with minisculebrains and even longer tails. All sauropod dinosaurs were herbivores. At onetime they were believed to have lived in swamps and shallow lakes because oftheir massive weight--up to 50 tons--but this idea has since been abandoned.It was also once believed that they had a second "brain" in their tail, but this toohas been disproved. There are several subgroups of sauropods--cetiosaurids,euhelopodids, diplodocids (the subgroup to which apatosaurus/brontosaurusbelongs), dicraeosaurids, rebbachisaurids, camarasaurids, brachiosaurids,and titanosaurids. All share the same general body plan but differ in smalldetails such as the shape of the vertibrae and the shape of the teeth. Thereis some evidence that they were herd animals and had regu...

AVG RATING:
(0)

DRosent288

02:26 AMJul 17 2009

Both "Clancy" and brontosaurus--more properly called apatosaurus belong to alarge grouping of dinosaurs called sauropods, characterized by huge bodies,massive pillar-like legs, grotesquely long necks with tiny heads with minisculebrains and even longer tails. All sauropod dinosaurs were herbivores. At onetime they were believed to have lived in swamps and shallow lakes because oftheir massive weight--up to 50 tons--but this idea has since been abandoned.It was also once believed that they had a second "brain" in their tail, but this toohas been disproved. There are several subgroups of sauropods--cetiosaurids,euhelopodids, diplodocids (the subgroup to which apatosaurus/brontosaurusbelongs), dicraeosaurids, rebbachisaurids, camarasaurids, brachiosaurids,and titanosaurids. All share the same general body plan but differ in smalldetails such as the shape of the vertibrae and the shape of the teeth. Thereis some evidence that they were herd animals and had regu...

AVG RATING:
(0)

AresPrometheus

11:47 AMJul 07 2009

Abyssquick-- Not to mention the fact that to not believe in god would get you in a heap of trouble for heresy.

AVG RATING:
(0)

TrekkinBob

05:30 PMJul 06 2009

lildaisyfeet Click to read Low-rated and possibly explicit material. 07:59 AMJul 06 2009 "....: What other book ever written has had an impact equal to or greater than the Bible? Our Founding Fathers believed in it--you know, the ones who wrote the Declaration of Independence. ...............Perhaps this is why they approved the street construction layout of Washington D.C. paraleling the lines of a Pentagram - one of the major Masonic symbols of the time. Its laughable people think of our Founding Forefathers as bible thumping Xtians. They were far from it. Most of them wanted nothing at all to do with relgion. A few were Deists, some were atheists or agnostic, but ALL of them were shrewd businessmen who believed in independence from an suppressive monarchy. If they'd truly believed in Jesus they wouldn't have held slaves or born children with some of them. ....Oh wait, this is approved by the bible too...

AVG RATING:
(0)

benne841

04:56 PMJul 06 2009

07:59 AMJul 06 2009 Wow. Here's my response to those who claim the Bible is just a book of "fairytales": What other book ever written has had an impact equal to or greater than the Bible@@@@@ The Koran.

AVG RATING:
(2)

Abyssquick

03:37 PMJul 06 2009

lildaisyfeet, it is disingenuous to imply that people like Issac Newton, Louis Pasteur, Carolus Linnaeus, and many other scientific figures were bible-believers (and in fact likely creationists). The culture & knowledge of their time offered them little else to believe. They didn't know anywhere near what we do in the modern day. Yes, science was based on creationism centuries ago, but now we know better, having actually identified the mechanisms responsible for many pivotal natural phenomena. Physics. Disease. Atoms. Biochemistry. Evolution. Every one of these things we used to attribute to "God" in our ignorance of what was actually going on. Our whole modern world is built on this closely refined understanding of the world around us. It would be ridiculous not to expect profound changes in thinking.

AVG RATING:
(5)

Abyssquick

03:30 PMJul 06 2009

Lest we also forget the rather explicity words written in the Treaty of Tripoli, which divulge the meaning / intent of the First Amendment - "As the Government of the United States of America is not, in any sense, founded on the Christian religion; as it has in itself no character of enmity against the laws, religion, or..."Timothy Pickering, the secretary of state, endorsed it and John Adams concurred (now during his presidency), sending the document on to the Senate. The Senate approved the treaty on June 7, 1797, and officially ratified by the Senate with John Adams signature on 10 June, 1797. All during this multi-review process, the wording of Article 11 never raised the slightest concern. The treaty even became public through its publication in The Philadelphia Gazette on 17 June 1797.I think whoever keeps spreading this idea that the USA rests on a conception of Christ-foundation, needs to read a little more history.

AVG RATING:
(4)

Abyssquick

03:26 PMJul 06 2009

The "Christian Nation" argument?"Great men may gain nothing from religion, but religion has everything to gain from great men."The USA's Founding Fathers, though they respected the rights of other religionists, held to the tenets of Deism & Freemasonry rather than to Christianity. There is little doubt, should one actually read their writings, that they saw reason as primary in uncovering truth, actually criticizing Christianity for it's dogma, & ability to stifle reason.Thomas Jefferson made an interpretation of the 1st Amendment to his January 1st, 1802 letter to the Committee of the Danbury Baptist Association calling it a "wall of separation between church and State." Madison had also written that "Strongly guarded. . . is the separation between religion and government in the Constitution of the United States." There exists little controversy about this interpretation from our Founding Fathers, among people who --actually study it-- !

AVG RATING:
(4)

AresPrometheus

11:09 AMJul 06 2009

lildaisyfeet-- The is a significant amount of evidence that strongly suggests that many of the founding fathers were agnostic or even atheist. Benjamin Franklin was much more interested in science than religion. Newton was a well-known agnostic. Besides, there is a vast difference between people who believe in god and die-hard young-earth creationists who willingly ignore facts in favor of religious nonsense.

AVG RATING:
(4)

ParkLf4

08:17 AMJul 06 2009

lildaisyfeet wrote: Wow. Here's my response to those who claim the Bible is just a book of "fairytales": What other book ever written has had an impact equal to or greater than the Bible? Our Founding Fathers believed in it--you know, the ones who wrote the Declaration of Independence. Same goes for George Washington Carver, Isaac Newton, Louis Pasteur.. ---------The fact that the Bible has been influential does not make it true. Myths and legends have always been influential on human society. The Koran, the Vedic texts and the Buddhist sutras have also been hugely influential on human society. So were Das Kapital and the Communist Manifesto. Are all those texts true? By the way Newton was a Christian but he a highly unorthodox one who would have been burnt at the stake for heresy had he lived a few years earlier. Nor was the bible 'written' in any sense that we would understand to day. It is a collection of text that were collected over a long period of history.

AVG RATING:
(5)

1 - 10 of 366

{ JOIN the CONVERSATION }

YOU'LL BE ASKED TO REGISTER OR LOGIN BEFORE POSTING A COMMENT.

News Makers

NewsmakersSinger Chris Brown says he wishes Rihanna would have kept the details of the night he attacked her "a private matter."1 of 8

News Makers

 

All Good News, All The Time

GNN

The Savings Experiment

cleaning products


* Want the latest Hot Seat polls delivered to your Vista desktop? Hot Seat Vista Gadget »

 

Politics Daily

Sports

Money

Technology

Health

Entertainment

Scientists have confirmed for the first time that Australia was once home to a dinosaur that was big, fast and terrifying, and they\'ve named it like something from an Arnold Schwarzenegger movie. Meet the Australovenator.