Submitted
newsSee Videos »
RECENT
comments- Pavinz on Officials Say Ft. Hood Suspect Acted Alone
- RSticks18 on Sources: Obama Near Afghan Decision
- LuvMyArmyMan1998 on Son Allegedly Killed Dad With Alzheimer's
- Grizzlybearcub on DC Sniper Mastermind Set to Be Executed
- LoofahLilly on Court Won't Block DC Sniper's Execution
Related Articles
(366)
DRosent288
02:27 AMJul 17 2009
Both "Clancy" and brontosaurus--more properly called apatosaurus belong to alarge grouping of dinosaurs called sauropods, characterized by huge bodies,massive pillar-like legs, grotesquely long necks with tiny heads with minisculebrains and even longer tails. All sauropod dinosaurs were herbivores. At onetime they were believed to have lived in swamps and shallow lakes because oftheir massive weight--up to 50 tons--but this idea has since been abandoned.It was also once believed that they had a second "brain" in their tail, but this toohas been disproved. There are several subgroups of sauropods--cetiosaurids,euhelopodids, diplodocids (the subgroup to which apatosaurus/brontosaurusbelongs), dicraeosaurids, rebbachisaurids, camarasaurids, brachiosaurids,and titanosaurids. All share the same general body plan but differ in smalldetails such as the shape of the vertibrae and the shape of the teeth. Thereis some evidence that they were herd animals and had regu...
DRosent288
02:26 AMJul 17 2009
Both "Clancy" and brontosaurus--more properly called apatosaurus belong to alarge grouping of dinosaurs called sauropods, characterized by huge bodies,massive pillar-like legs, grotesquely long necks with tiny heads with minisculebrains and even longer tails. All sauropod dinosaurs were herbivores. At onetime they were believed to have lived in swamps and shallow lakes because oftheir massive weight--up to 50 tons--but this idea has since been abandoned.It was also once believed that they had a second "brain" in their tail, but this toohas been disproved. There are several subgroups of sauropods--cetiosaurids,euhelopodids, diplodocids (the subgroup to which apatosaurus/brontosaurusbelongs), dicraeosaurids, rebbachisaurids, camarasaurids, brachiosaurids,and titanosaurids. All share the same general body plan but differ in smalldetails such as the shape of the vertibrae and the shape of the teeth. Thereis some evidence that they were herd animals and had regu...
AresPrometheus
11:47 AMJul 07 2009
Abyssquick-- Not to mention the fact that to not believe in god would get you in a heap of trouble for heresy.
TrekkinBob
05:30 PMJul 06 2009
lildaisyfeet Click to read Low-rated and possibly explicit material. 07:59 AMJul 06 2009 "....: What other book ever written has had an impact equal to or greater than the Bible? Our Founding Fathers believed in it--you know, the ones who wrote the Declaration of Independence. ...............Perhaps this is why they approved the street construction layout of Washington D.C. paraleling the lines of a Pentagram - one of the major Masonic symbols of the time. Its laughable people think of our Founding Forefathers as bible thumping Xtians. They were far from it. Most of them wanted nothing at all to do with relgion. A few were Deists, some were atheists or agnostic, but ALL of them were shrewd businessmen who believed in independence from an suppressive monarchy. If they'd truly believed in Jesus they wouldn't have held slaves or born children with some of them. ....Oh wait, this is approved by the bible too...
benne841
04:56 PMJul 06 2009
07:59 AMJul 06 2009 Wow. Here's my response to those who claim the Bible is just a book of "fairytales": What other book ever written has had an impact equal to or greater than the Bible@@@@@ The Koran.
Abyssquick
03:37 PMJul 06 2009
lildaisyfeet, it is disingenuous to imply that people like Issac Newton, Louis Pasteur, Carolus Linnaeus, and many other scientific figures were bible-believers (and in fact likely creationists). The culture & knowledge of their time offered them little else to believe. They didn't know anywhere near what we do in the modern day. Yes, science was based on creationism centuries ago, but now we know better, having actually identified the mechanisms responsible for many pivotal natural phenomena. Physics. Disease. Atoms. Biochemistry. Evolution. Every one of these things we used to attribute to "God" in our ignorance of what was actually going on. Our whole modern world is built on this closely refined understanding of the world around us. It would be ridiculous not to expect profound changes in thinking.
Abyssquick
03:30 PMJul 06 2009
Lest we also forget the rather explicity words written in the Treaty of Tripoli, which divulge the meaning / intent of the First Amendment - "As the Government of the United States of America is not, in any sense, founded on the Christian religion; as it has in itself no character of enmity against the laws, religion, or..."Timothy Pickering, the secretary of state, endorsed it and John Adams concurred (now during his presidency), sending the document on to the Senate. The Senate approved the treaty on June 7, 1797, and officially ratified by the Senate with John Adams signature on 10 June, 1797. All during this multi-review process, the wording of Article 11 never raised the slightest concern. The treaty even became public through its publication in The Philadelphia Gazette on 17 June 1797.I think whoever keeps spreading this idea that the USA rests on a conception of Christ-foundation, needs to read a little more history.
Abyssquick
03:26 PMJul 06 2009
The "Christian Nation" argument?"Great men may gain nothing from religion, but religion has everything to gain from great men."The USA's Founding Fathers, though they respected the rights of other religionists, held to the tenets of Deism & Freemasonry rather than to Christianity. There is little doubt, should one actually read their writings, that they saw reason as primary in uncovering truth, actually criticizing Christianity for it's dogma, & ability to stifle reason.Thomas Jefferson made an interpretation of the 1st Amendment to his January 1st, 1802 letter to the Committee of the Danbury Baptist Association calling it a "wall of separation between church and State." Madison had also written that "Strongly guarded. . . is the separation between religion and government in the Constitution of the United States." There exists little controversy about this interpretation from our Founding Fathers, among people who --actually study it-- !
AresPrometheus
11:09 AMJul 06 2009
lildaisyfeet-- The is a significant amount of evidence that strongly suggests that many of the founding fathers were agnostic or even atheist. Benjamin Franklin was much more interested in science than religion. Newton was a well-known agnostic. Besides, there is a vast difference between people who believe in god and die-hard young-earth creationists who willingly ignore facts in favor of religious nonsense.
ParkLf4
08:17 AMJul 06 2009
lildaisyfeet wrote: Wow. Here's my response to those who claim the Bible is just a book of "fairytales": What other book ever written has had an impact equal to or greater than the Bible? Our Founding Fathers believed in it--you know, the ones who wrote the Declaration of Independence. Same goes for George Washington Carver, Isaac Newton, Louis Pasteur.. ---------The fact that the Bible has been influential does not make it true. Myths and legends have always been influential on human society. The Koran, the Vedic texts and the Buddhist sutras have also been hugely influential on human society. So were Das Kapital and the Communist Manifesto. Are all those texts true? By the way Newton was a Christian but he a highly unorthodox one who would have been burnt at the stake for heresy had he lived a few years earlier. Nor was the bible 'written' in any sense that we would understand to day. It is a collection of text that were collected over a long period of history.
{ JOIN the CONVERSATION }

YOU'LL BE ASKED TO REGISTER OR LOGIN BEFORE POSTING A COMMENT.
News Makers
 
All Good News, All The Time
- Want a dose of upbeat news, videos and photos in your day?
- Visit Good News Now
- Do homemade cleaning products save money? And do they work?
- Visit The Savings Experiment
Politics Daily
- A Win for Democrats in Charlotte Offers Lessons (Maybe)
- Pro-Life Dems Test Party's Leadership as Abortion Battle Looms
- White House Chef Sam Kass Cooks Up Food and Healthy Eating Policy
- Abortion Rights Backers Threaten Primaries, 'No' Votes on Health
- James K. Polk and the Lessons of War We Never Seem to Learn
Sports
- NBA great Abdul-Jabbar has rare form of leukemia
- Carter fills in for Clark, sparks Steelers to win
- Phelps misses 2 of 3 finals at World Cup meet
- No. 6 Tar Heels spoil Isiah Thomas' debut with FIU
- Thousands turn out for Tiger's practice round
Money
- Beazer Homes posts profit in fiscal 4th quarter
- Housing plan helps 20 pct in Calif, Nev., Ariz.
- Energy agency warns of falling investment
- Merkel presses GM for Opel concept
- Stock futures point to lower Wall Street open
Technology
- Kick Your Friends in the Face With 'FaceFighter' iPhone App
- Parents Start 24/7 Webcast of Disabled Daughter
- Save a Soaked Cell Phone
- Blu-ray Releases This Week
- Best of the Rest: Photoshop Comes to Android, Elderly Shred on 'Guitar Hero'
Health
- Scanning invisible damage of PTSD, brain blasts
- UK starts study on using human DNA in animals
- WHO: AIDS leading cause of death, disease in women
- Lawmaker wants probe of E. coli and school lunches
- Expanding drug treatment: Is US ready to step up?
Entertainment
More News
- Tropical Storm Ida to make landfall on Gulf Coast
- Bill Clinton to address Senate Dems
- Hoops great Abdul-Jabbar has cancer
- WH denies Afghan decision made
- Missed clues sought in Ft. Hood inquiry
- More Stories
- Obama's Afghan Plan: About 40K More Troops
- A Senate Seat Battle for the GOP's Soul
- Exclusive: Rape in America: Justice Denied
- Bill Clinton Tackles Senate Abortion Rift
- Michigan Man, 21, Wins Poker World Series
- More Stories





