JERUSALEM -Former Prime Minister Ehud Olmert offered to swap Israeli territory near the Gaza Strip and West Bank in exchange for settlement blocs in the West Bank, the Haaretz newspaper reported Thursday, in the most detailed account of the former Israeli leader's proposed peace offer to the Palestinians.
The September 2008 proposal was submitted at a time when Olmert's ability to negotiate a peace deal was compromised by corruption allegations that eventually forced him to step down.
Palestinian negotiator Saeb Erekat said the Palestinian side made a counterproposal and that further talks were planned. But talks broke down after Israel's war against Gaza militants a year ago and never resumed.
Since leaving office in March, Olmert has said he offered the Palestinians unprecedented concessions, including a broad withdrawal from almost all of the West Bank and shared control of Jerusalem.
Olmert has also said he offered the Palestinians small pieces of Israeli territory in exchange for keeping major Jewish settlements in the West Bank.
In all, Olmert proposed ceding Israeli territory equivalent to 5.8 percent of the West Bank for a slightly larger piece of the West Bank where 75 percent of the 300,000 Jewish settlers live. The rest of the settlers would be evacuated under his proposal.
Among the Israeli territory he offered was nearly 39 square miles (100 square kilometers) near the tiny Gaza Strip and nearly 88 square miles (227 square kilometers) close to the West Bank, much of it from the Judean desert near the West Bank's southern end, Haaretz said, citing unidentified sources familiar with Olmert's proposals.
The former Israeli leader also proposed a road link through Israel to allow Palestinians to travel between the West Bank and Gaza, which lie on opposite sides of Israel. That highway would have remained sovereign Israeli territory but there would have been no Israeli presence there, Haaretz said.
While Olmert has spoken in general terms about his offer, the Haaretz report offered far greater detail.
In an interview with Haaretz earlier this week, Abbas said Olmert presented several maps for consideration. And Olmert's office said in response to Haaretz that the map he presented to Abbas on Sept. 16, 2008 differed from the map Haaretz published Thursday.
Erekat said Olmert wanted 6.5 percent of the West Bank in exchange for Israeli territory equivalent to 5.8 percent of the West Bank. The corridor between the West Bank and Gaza would make up the balance.
Erekat said Abbas counter-offered a land swap equal to 1.9 percent of the West Bank. The three major settlement blocs make up about 2.5 percent of the West Bank, but they are served by a network of Israeli-built roads that eat up additional territory.
Erekat said the two parties were to have gone to Washington on Jan. 3 "to lock in this deal and see if we could further these offers.
"Unfortunately, Olmert went into a war in Gaza," so the Palestinians didn't go, he said.
Speaking in Nablus on Thursday, Abbas said the Palestinians will not accept any deal without getting all of east Jerusalem, the sector Israel captured in the 1967 Mideast war and annexed. That includes a holy site claimed by both sides, where the al-Aqsa Mosque sits atop the ruins of the biblical Jewish Temples. Israel has built a ring of Jewish neighborhoods around east Jerusalem.
"There is no Palestine without Jerusalem," he told a crowd of several thousand at An Najah University. "Without that, there will be no peace at all."
Thursday's report could give ammunition to both the Palestinians and the conservative government of Israeli Prime Minister Benjamin Netanyahu.
The Palestinians have demanded that Netanyahu resume talks from where they broke down under Olmert. Israeli hard-liners, meanwhile, say the Palestinian failure to accept Olmert's offer proves they are not serious about peace.
Under U.S. pressure, Netanyahu has imposed a 10-month moratorium on certain settlement construction in a move designed to persuade the Palestinians to resume negotiations. But the Palestinians say they will not resume talks until there is a full halt to all construction, including in east Jerusalem, which they claim as the capital of their future state.
—
Additional reporting by Dalia Nammari in Nablus, West Bank.
6:33AM Dec 17 2009
The solution is a time scale where Israel and Palestinians are told that if no effective solution is made by XXXX then the 1967 borders >>>>>>>>>>Initop Replies: Two things: The 1967 "border" was not a border but an armistice line, moron. Secondly, if all the "Palestinians" want is a country in Judea, Sumaria and Gaza, why didn't they declare it when it was under Arab control? :)
6:33AM Dec 17 2009
The solution is a time scale where Israel and Palestinians are told that if no effective solution is made by XXXX then the 1967 borders >>>>>>>>>>Initop Replies: Two things: The 1967 "border" was not a border but an armistice line, moron. Secondly, if all the "Palestinians" want is a country in Judea, Sumaria and Gaza, why didn't they declare it when it was under Arab control? :)
9:41PM Dec 15 2009
I am an American citizen and I do not support Israel. God did however make a covenant with me that I am to inherit the state of Connecticut as my promised land, in particular Joe Lieberman's property############ I was offered a similar deal. HOw can this be?
I doubt we will see anything happen though - the conflict has been the biggest source of friction and hatred in the middleast for generations, fostering war, recriminations, and terrorism - even knowing what has happened I suspect the same things will be happening to the next generation and the whole world will still be scratching its head and wondering why people feel disgruntled about living as second class citizens, in their own land, with no rights living under military occupation.
The Lobby and to some extent also Israel need a constant flow of conflicts and more or less imaginary enemies.>>>>>>>>>Initop replies: Whatever "influence" Israel has or tries to exert is for her defense. To deny Israel lives in a bad neighborhood, surrounded by those bent on her destruction is ridiculous. And, like it or not, there IS an over abundance of "bad Moslems." All but a few armed conflicts around the world involve Moslems. To suggest Israel relishes conflict is absurd. She has a first-world economy and standard of living despite the fact ******** people are amongst the most heavily taxed because so much of her resources must go to defense. Israelis of all stripes and colors embrace and love life. It's the Arab/Moslem that loves their culture of death.
The Lobby and to some extent also Israel need a constant flow of conflicts and more or less imaginary enemies.