Download the AOL News Toolbar
Our new toolbar integrates latest news into your Web browser and installs in seconds. Download it now!
Send Us Feedback
News Video
Find, view and share videos about news and entertainment from around the Web.
See Videos »

News Alerts

The latest updates sent straight to your inbox.

Get AOL News Alerts »

Sotomayor Pledges 'Impartial Justice'

By DAVID ESPO and MARK SHERMAN
,
AP
posted: 116 DAYS 14 HOURS AGO
comments: 3615
filed under: ,
Text SizeAAA
WASHINGTON (July 13) — Sonia Sotomayor, the first Hispanic Supreme Court nominee in history, vowed loyalty to "the impartiality of our justice system" Monday, confronting Republican skeptics at Senate hearings suffused with racial politics but all but certain to lead to her confirmation.
"My personal and professional experiences help me to listen and understand, with the law always commanding the result in every case," the 55-year old Sotomayor said in her first substantive remarks in public since President Barack Obama nominated her seven weeks ago.
Skip over this content
Skip over this content Skip over this content


Her comments amounted to a polite but firm rebuttal to Republicans who have criticized her 2001 comment that a "wise Latina woman with the richness of her experiences" might make better rulings than a white male.
Despite GOP misgivings, Democrats command a large majority in the committee and the Senate as a whole, and there seemed virtually no doubt about the ultimate outcome.
"Unless you have a complete meltdown, you're going to get confirmed," Sen. Lindsey Graham, R-S.C., told her.
"And I don't think you will" have a meltdown, he added quickly as Sotomayor sat listening, her face in a half-smile.
She'll answer questions Tuesday following Monday's day of speechmaking by committee members and her own five-minute statement.
Unlike senators who will vote on her appointment, Sotomayor made no overt reference to her place in history as the daughter of Puerto Rican parents who moved to New York. Instead, she said her life has been "uniquely American," and she recalled a childhood in a south Bronx housing project.
"I want to make one special note of thanks to my mother," she said. "I am here today because of her aspirations and sacrifices for my brother Juan and me."
She turned as she spoke, whispering a thank-you to her mother, seated one row behind her in the packed hearing room.
Sotomayor spoke after listening for hours as Democrats on the Senate Judiciary Committee praised her as a pioneer well qualified for the high court and Republicans questioned her impartiality and accused Obama of adhering to a double standard in selecting her.
At times, senators of both parties seemed intent on trying to settle old scores at the hearings for the first high court nominee picked by a Democrat in 15 years.
Sen. Sheldon Whitehouse, D-R.I., observed acidly that the current court "has not kept the promises of modesty or humility made when President Bush nominated Justices Roberts and Alito."
A short while earlier, Sen. Orrin Hatch, R-Utah, said that as a senator, Obama had opposed Janice Rogers Brown, an African-American and Bush appointee to the appeals court.
"He argued that the test of a qualified judicial nominee is whether she can set aside her personal views" and decide cases on their merits, Hatch said of the president. "But today, President Obama says that personal empathy is an essential ingredient in judicial decisions."
That was a reference to the president's statement that he wanted a justice who had empathy as well as a sterling legal resume. Republicans have sought repeatedly to exploit the president's remarks in recent weeks. Often, they use it in conjunction with Sotomayor's 2001 statement that as a "wise Latina" she might be a better judge in some cases than a white male.
Obama named Sotomayor to replace Justice David Souter, who went home to New Hampshire after retiring last month.
While Souter was appointed nearly two decades ago by President George H.W. Bush, a Republican, he became a reliable member of the court's liberal bloc. As a result, if she is confirmed, Sotomayor is not expected to alter the court's balance on controversial issues such as abortion and affirmative action.
Sotomayor walked into the hearing room escorted by senators and wearing a white supporting boot for her right ankle, which she injured several days after she was tapped for the court.
She spoke for only about five minutes at the end of the day's session but faces long days of questioning on Tuesday and Wednesday.
Apart from raising questions about her impartiality, Republicans have served notice they will focus on the issues of gun ownership, abortion, and a ruling on white firefighters from New Haven, Conn., who won their case last month when the Supreme Court reversed a decision by a New York appeals court panel that included Sotomayor.
GOP Sen. Graham's prediction of confirmation appeared to unsettle at least one other Republican. "Lindsey and I might have a different definition of meltdown, so I'm not going to predict what will happen," said Sen. Jon Kyl, of Arizona, the Senate's second-ranking Republican.
Graham was the only senator of either party to touch openly on the underlying politics of the nomination — that Republicans must be careful to keep faith with their conservative constituents, yet avoid appearing mean-spirited in questioning a nominee who represents the fastest-growing segment of the electorate.
"The Hispanic element of this hearing is important, but ... this is mostly about liberal and conservative politics more than it is about anything else," he said.
Graham hinted that he would vote to confirm Sotomayor, noting that Obama had won the election, and with it, the right to nominate justices.
But he was the only Republican to sound so inclined.
The role of racial politics in the day's proceedings became clear within minutes after Sen. Patrick Leahy, the committee chairman, rapped the opening gavel.
"She's been a judge for all Americans. She'll be a justice for all Americans," said the Vermont Democrat.
Leahy likened Sotomayor to other judicial pioneers, citing Thurgood Marshall, the first black justice, as well as Louis Brandeis, the first Jew, and Sandra Day O'Connor, the first woman.
"Let no one demean this extraordinary woman," Leahy said in a warning to committee Republicans to tread lightly in the days ahead.
Sen. Jeff Sessions of Alabama, the senior Republican, promised a "respectful tone" and "maybe some disagreements" when lawmakers begin questioning Sotomayor on Tuesday.
"I will not vote for, and no senator should vote for an individual nominated by any president who believes it is acceptable for a judge to allow their own personal background, gender, prejudices or sympathies to sway their decision," he said.
"Call it empathy, call it prejudice or call it sympathy, but whatever it is, it's not law," Sessions said. "In truth, it's more akin to politics, and politics has no place in the courtroom."
But Republicans also lined up to note the historic nature of the day.
"I would hope every American is proud that a Hispanic woman has been nominated to sit on the Supreme Court," said Kyl.
The hearing was interrupted three times by protests opposed to abortion. Each time, police hustled a demonstrator from the room.
Copyright 2009 The Associated Press. The information contained in the AP news report may not be published, broadcast, rewritten or otherwise distributed without the prior written authority of The Associated Press. Active hyperlinks have been inserted by AOL.
2009-07-13 06:19:29

Related Articles

  1. See More Related Articles and Blog Posts
(3615)
Sort by:

1 - 10

Jumphigh83

07:46 AMJul 19 2009

She is a racist. We dont need any more racists (Obama) in leadership positions.

AVG RATING:
(18)

Waywardeagle2

06:04 AMJul 19 2009

Only my opinion, After being a Prosecutor she has lost all credibility to be a fail judge of Law.Prosecutors use Conviction Percentage to climb the Ladder.I would prefer to see Joe the plunber on the Court.

AVG RATING:
(4)

Grey Eagle Mare

09:26 PMJul 19 2009

Read Clarence THomas's book....My Grandfathers Son....fantastic!!!!!! Joe stinken rotten Biden lied and gave him the worst time.....what a creep Biden is.....disgusting man.

AVG RATING:
(17)

Denlee 42

06:26 PMJul 18 2009

From Robert Bork to Sonia Sotomayor I almost feel sorry for any nominee to the Supreme Court. I found Patrick Leahy's comments to Republicans asking them to be civil to the nominee. I watched with keen interest the confirmation hearings of Clarence Thomas, John Roberts, and Samuel Alito. Leahy and many other Demos on the committee literally barbecued these guys. Joe Biden, the Windbag of Washington, harangued for 30 minutes at Sam Alito as he told the nominee he was just about the worst possible choice. Ted Kennedy's bashing of these guys was shameful. I thought the Republicans were overall courteous to Judge Sotomayor regardless of the tough questions. This whole process has become so politicized that nominees are expected to please every conceivable pressure group in the country. Somehow the true role of judges has become clouded in this whole process. This is not good for our country. I am beginning to think any jurist should have his/her head examined before accepting the president...

AVG RATING:
(4)

typeup17

11:16 PMJul 18 2009

Stevedanurse1 09:49 AMJul 17 2009 An impartial liberal democrat?....that has to be the best oxyMORON ever....What about French Resistance?

AVG RATING:
(15)
Boredwell Click to read Low-rated and possibly explicit material.

Cclawnj

01:41 PMJul 17 2009

In her now-famous speech delivered at the University of California in 2001, Judge Sotomayer called impartiality a mere "aspiration," which she indicates cannot actually be achieved and may even be undesirable. She wasn't exactly impartial, or even competent in the firefighters case. Now she says she'll be impartial. If she's had a life-changing experience like Saul on the road to Damascus, let's hear about it. Otherwise, she's just kidding us.

AVG RATING:
(22)

Onemileast

11:29 AMJul 17 2009

It is unrealistic to expect ANYONE who has a working mind to judge absolutely and impartially about events. But we do hope and trust that those on the Supreme Court will turn to the LAW and make their judgements on the letter instead of some previous personnel bias. That is all we can hope for when we have have only humans to guide the nation. If we have no God in heaven we are prone to make a god of someone on earth. Let's not try to put gods on the Supreme Court nor expect Messiahship on any politician. How we separate faith and state has been a ticklish operation from the beginning. But we can't stop trying, can we?

AVG RATING:
(1)

Stevedanurse1

09:49 AMJul 17 2009

An impartial liberal democrat?....that has to be the best oxyMORON ever....

AVG RATING:
(16)
SVivar9087 Click to read Low-rated and possibly explicit material.

1 - 10 of 3615

{ JOIN the CONVERSATION }

YOU'LL BE ASKED TO REGISTER OR LOGIN BEFORE POSTING A COMMENT.

News Makers

NewsmakersThe world champion Yankees get a ticker-tape parade and a heroes' welcome in New York. 1 of 7

News Makers

 

All Good News, All The Time

GNN

The Savings Experiment

cleaning products


* Want the latest Hot Seat polls delivered to your Vista desktop? Hot Seat Vista Gadget »

 

Politics Daily

Sports

Money

Technology

Health

Entertainment

Senate Democrats praised Sonia Sotomayor as a Hispanic pioneer well qualified for the Supreme Court on Monday, but Republicans questioned her impartiality and President Barack Obama\'s views as well at the start of confirmation hearings.