In a campaign season where the emphasis will hopefully be, at least in part, on integrity and honesty, strength of character, etc, etc., what does it say about a candidate who rewrites his own press releases to delete someone that turned out to be an embarrassment to him? Senator Larry Craig was Mitt Romney's Senate liaison up until a few days ago, at which time his relationship with Mr. Romney was severed for reasons that make all kinds of sense. However, all references to Senator Craig have now been removed from previously published press releases -- check out his Web site.
It's one thing to sever a relationship when someone you hired turns out not to be the one with whom you want to be associated -- seems to be happening a lot these days. However, to pretend the relationship never existed is something else again. Nations have been known to rewrite history to serve their own ends -- even our own history textbooks gloss over much of what might be considered unpleasant aspects of our history. Of course, it doesn't change history, just attempts to mislead people.
Mr. Romney has shown a convenient propensity to change his views on controversial issues in order to better appeal to certain constituencies now that he is running for president. I guess he also has a propensity to change (or hire people who will change) the facts to suit his purposes as well. You would think that in this day of the Internet and instant video replays that these people would get it. You can't hide this stuff.
Addendum: I thought the above opinion was clear, but after reading many of the comments below, apparently it was not. I have absolutely NO problem with Mr. Romney immediately severing his association with Senator Craig. It is what any politician with a brain in his or her head would have done and should have done. I think the Senator's behavior was sleazy and pathetic. What made it doubly so, in my opinion, was the hypocrisy that it represented given his dogmatic stance against gays, gay rights, etc., etc. (me thinks thou doth protest too much).
What bothered me about what Romney's campaign did was that by changing an already published press release to delete all references to Senator Craig's former position with the campaign, they were, in fact, rewriting history. I think we have had enough of an administration in the last six years that has played loose with the truth and assumed that Americans were gullible or naive enough that they could "change" the truth and that would make it so. All Mr. Romney had to do was to announce that he was severing the relationship with Senator Craig because in light of current events, it was obvious that he did not represent the values in which Mr. Romney believes. End of story. This sort of behavior strikes me as a knee-jerk reaction to a situation without thinking through the ramifications -- not something that gives me warm fuzzies about his potential administration.


Reader Comments ( Page 2 of 2)
16. Question...when the press release were adjusted to exclude Craig, were the dates of the PR changed as well? If so, then I absolutely agree it was the right things to do; if the PR was re-released with the same date, then I believe it was a bad call.
Regardless, I am a Romney supporter.
Rob at 10:49PM on Sep 3rd 2007
17. People forget about Graigs future he'll be fine but its time to move forward.There's nothing good come out by looking backward except turning into a pillar of salt as the famous story in the Bible about Lot and his wife.Looking back is also a sign of a weak candidate because he or she cannot focus straight forward of what is ahead for the brightest hope of the country.You find this a lot in the democratic party candidates they love to look back at their failure.
KaM at 3:33AM on Sep 4th 2007
18. Please read "Under the banner of Heaven'' before you elect this guy
kathy okeefe at 8:47AM on Sep 5th 2007
19. Mitt Romney is the next President after George Bush.
Kava at 1:28AM on Sep 20th 2007