Fresh back from Syria, where he served as a
media pawn for President Assad, Democrat presidential candidate
Dennis Kucinich took a proud stand today, voting
against the September 11th Commemoration Resolution in the House. In fact, he was the only one who voted against it. Here's the title of the
resolution, introduced by Rep. Steny Hoyer (D-Md.):
Recognizing September 11 as a day of rememberance, extending sympathies to those who lost their lives on September 11, 2001, and their families, honoring the heroic actions of our nation's first responders and Armed Forces, and reaffirming the commitment to defending the people of the United States against any and all future challenges.
Yea, I can see how that's a pretty inflammatory resolution. Kucinich expounded on his reasons for spitting in the eyes of the families of those killed by
al-Qaida on 9/11/01, of course:
It is important that Congress wake up to the truth and exercise its obligation under the Constitution to save our nation from being destroyed from the lies that took us into Iraq, the lies that keep us there, the lies that are being used to set the stage for war against Iran and the lies that have undermined our basic civil liberties here at home," Kucinich said in a statement. "The September 11 resolution that Congress considers today should have made reference to those matters. It does not, so I cannot support it," Kucinich said, also calling for a halt for further war funding and the troops to be brought home.
Whatever you say, President-to-Be Dennis. No need to create an international incident over it...
Reader Comments ( Page 1 of 1)
1. I like Dennis, he's very entertaining...reminds me of a cartoon rat
John at 3:03PM on Sep 16th 2007
2. A little late with my comment, but I just ran across this blog.
Why, if the Resolution was to honor those who sacrificed, was it necessary to include the following language:
"and reaffirming the commitment to defending the people of the United States against any and all future challenges."
Sounds to me like Kucinich hit the nail on the head when he refused to support the Resolution as worded.
That phrase has no place in the Resolution, and I agree with Kucinich. The problem with Resolutions like this one is that if you don't support it, you are branded "unpatriotic" or as you worded it, "spitting in the eyes of the families of those killed."
This leads to support based on guilt. Kucinich is the only one who apparently had the guts to refuse to support it with the unnecessary wording.
Charlotte A. Weybright at 1:37PM on Oct 21st 2007