And that this is all a huge bitter blow considering all the work Edwards has done since 2004, when he was the labor nominee:The top leadership of the SEIU met all day Monday in Chicago to consider who to back in the Democratic primaries but decided to postpone any formal endorsement. For at least two years Edwards has been laboring to line up union support which his strategists see as crucial to any realistic chance to capture the Democratic nomination. "John had been counting on the unions as a sort of super-charger, an after-burner," said a California operative of the Edwards campaign. "But now we are in danger of a flame-out."
Since the conclusion of the failed 2004 Democratic campaign, Edwards had been meticulously trying to build a solid, national union base. He walked endless picket lines, attended dozens of labor rallies and built strong personal relationships with top union leaders like Stern. His honed economic populist program was sweet music to union ears and six months ago an SEIU endorsement of Edwards seemed almost a slam dunk.But that the SEIU is not about to get burned again:
SEIU officials are openly concerned that their once-favored Edwards is running a distant third in most national and state polls (with the exception of Iowa) and may no longer be a viable candidate, no matter how many union resources are poured into his campaign.
Harsh, but absolutely true. The unions are not about to get shut out of this years election by backing the wrong candidate. And the wrong candidate this year appears to be anyone who isn't named Hillary Clinton. At this point her high standing at the polls is a self-reinforcing feedback loop that is keeping endorsements away from her challengers. She's exactly where she wants to be.
This must feel like a bitter blow to the John Edwards campaign, but it's good therapy, that someone is telling them the truth. John Edwards is not a viable national candidate. The message is great, he's a hard worker no doubt, but the difference between his message and the others is not different enough. He may stick to it to the January, but He'll be out by February. That's my prediction.


Reader Comments ( Page 1 of 1)
1. The SEIU is trying to play it safe. Edwards didn't lose this endorsement, they aren't ready to back anyone. Hillary supporters would use this rejection to their advantage to snub Edwards. It's like dating. Edwards asked for a kiss and SEIU didn't want to limit their options. A lady should never kiss on the first date. If Edwards is the right one, they will do more than kiss him later. Patience is a virtue. What man would throw a tantrum just because he didn't get what he wants on command? John Edwards is showing he's an adult. He can beat Hillary if he ties the failed Bush policies to Hillary. She's the one Democrat that will follow his policies in lock step. Been there done that! She's "Clinton's version of Bush". I just call her "Clinton's Bush". It's ugly, but true.
Cecil Jones at 8:30AM on Sep 27th 2007
2. #1 "He can beat Hillary if he ties the failed Bush policies to Hillary."
I can't wait to see this freak show that will transpire when those two start going at it.
Going to Sam's Club to stock up on popcorn...
lizard at 8:53PM on Sep 27th 2007
3. Dear NixGuy Clinton, the stump is clearly a mouthpiece of the Clintons, and it's nice to see how quickly you do their bidding. Too bad I don’t have AOL anymore, because then I could drop it.
davidgriffen at 11:37PM on Sep 28th 2007
4. Hillary will defeat Edwards simply due to Bill's help.
Just as junior won with daddy's help.
It'll be fun to watch I agree.
sue law at 7:25PM on Sep 29th 2007