Democrats Foreshadow Their Plans

Every so often, a Democrat actually proposes a bill that shows exactly how they would act if they were given a clear majority in both houses and the presidency. Rep. John Dingell is doing that now:

Dealing with global warming will be painful, says one of the most powerful Democrats in Congress. To back up his claim he is proposing a recipe many people won't like - a 50-cent gasoline tax, a carbon tax and scaling back tax breaks for some home owners.

"I'm trying to have everybody understand that this is going to cost and that it's going to have a measure of pain that you're not going to like," Rep. John Dingell, who is marking his 52nd year in Congress, said Wednesday in an interview with The Associated Press.

First off, 52 years in Congress? If that isn't a reason to propose term limits, what is?

Dingell wants gas constantly over $3-4 per gallon and he'll use the money to fight "global warming," a crisis that scientists can't even agree on, right? Well, not exactly:

Some of the revenue would be used to reduce payroll taxes, but most would go elsewhere including for highway construction, mass transit, paying for Social Security and health programs and to help the poor pay energy bills.

If that is not a Democratic plan, nothing is. The esteemed Representative wants to raise taxes under the guise of fighting global warming and will instead use the money to pay for social programs created by Democrats that have grown to large for the government to support. This show exquisitely that every single program the Dems enact needs a huge tax burden to support: Welfare, Social Security, Medicare, etc. The list goes on. The fact is, this is all a drop in the bucket if socialized medicine ever passes.

I guess it's a bit refreshing that Dingell is secure enough to show exactly what Dems plan to do if they get in power. It's kind of like Mondale saying that yes, he would raise taxes. We saw what that got the hapless Minnesotan--a thorough trouncing by the greatest President of the last half-century.

Remember when the judgement was levied against the big tobacco companies? The money was to be used for anti-tobacco initiatives, etc. Where do you think that money actually went (link in PDF)? Typical Dems, tax and spend on things that have nothing to do with why the taxes were levied in the first place.

Reader Comments ( Page 1 of 1)

Coming Soon

Most Recent Comments

Presidential Race News

    Politics Video

    Smitherman to run for Toronto mayor

    Smitherman to run for Toronto mayorSmitherman to run for Toronto mayor

    Corzine: May Be Retiring From Politics, Not Life

    Corzine: May Be Retiring From Politics,  Not LifeIn New Jersey, Republican Chris Christie defeated Democratic Governor Jon Corzine. The Republican victory deals a blow to President Barack Obama as he readies for next year's midterm elections. Obama campaigned heavily for Corzine. (Nov. 3)

    Analyst: Election Wasn't Referendum on Obama

    Analyst: Election Wasn't Referendum on ObamaLarry Sabato, director of the University of Virginia Center for Politics says Republican victories in New Jersey and Virginia was a failure for President Barack Obama's campaign efforts, but not a direct referendum on his job performance.

    Rebagliati will run

    Rebagliati will runSnowboarder Rebagliati slides into politics

    Snowboarder slides into politics

    Snowboarder slides into politicsSnowboarder Rebagliati slides into politics







    News Search
    AOL News

    Elections Blog

    Read the latest election news stories around the U.S. on AOL News. From congressional and gubernatorial elections to the latest local election results, we deliver the information you need.

    © 2009 AOL LLC. All Rights Reserved.
    AOL@News © 2009 AOL LLC. All Rights Reserved.
    BACK TO TOP
    Blogsmith