As happens with every good thing, this blog has run its course. We had a great run, the lot of us. Left, right...in between? We tried to bring you insight from every angle in a format that allowed expression of opinion, interplay between reader and writer and a bit of humor. I think we largely succeeded.
We all appreciated those who read our words regardless if you agreed or not. I for one drew immensely differing opinions. The written word, whether written by me or the exquisite Peggy Noonan is an absolute expression of the one who wrote such words, just as the comments were.
I find it refreshing that this medium has as much of an impact as it does. I'm not sure if blogs and public opinion are changing the world, yet one would hope that we have some small effect, whether it be a change in a Senate vote or a change in one single opinion. Politics have changed because we--and I mean you the reader as well as me the commentator--have paid attention and every single news story is a chance for us to comment and call those we elect on the carpet.
I've been writing online for nearly five years and I've posted things that were erroneous. At the very second I was proven wrong, I posted a retraction and let my story stand because that is the way of the citizen journalist. I wish that the pros would do the same. Perhaps with our persuasion they will.
Anyway, thank you for your loyalty and thank you to all the great writers assembled here. Thank you to Kathleen, David and Chris for holding this thing together and turning out a great product. Honestly, being highly skewed to the GOP end, I thought I would be highly edited. No way, my opinions were exactly like I wrote them and I believe every other writer enjoyed that same freedom. That's what made this blog roll along day in and day out.
Mostly though, I wish to thank our readers without whom we would have stopped in December. You were hard-core and read us, commented to us and picked off every single written mistake we've made. That's how it should be. I enjoyed the debate and hope to keep it going elsewhere. We are at a major crossroads in our great nation and debate is exactly what is needed. Personally, I got down and dirty with Manny, Veg and others and enjoyed the perspective you brought even though I couldn't agree any less. Thanks to all the guys and girls out there who took the time to tell me I'm an idiot--until now it was only my beautiful wife who thought that was the case. Please visit my other blog and continue the debate.
Finally, let me say that AOL tried something a bit bold here--a group blog with numerous opinions and numerous takes on daily events. That had not really been done previously and I applaud them for taking the risk and assembling an eclectic mix of bloggers. I was once asked via a commenter why the right-wing was so well represented. That's easy, we're Republicans and any chance of making money was not to be ignored so we wrote every day so we didn't miss out on the paycheck.
Thank you all and I will truly miss you all. Almost a year of my life was spent doing this and I wouldn't trade it for anything.
Respectfully.
Scott

Reader Comments ( Page 1 of 2)
1. Scott, Sorry to hear this message from you. Have been in your corner on most things you stated. May God be with you in whatever is next for you!! Where is your other blog? Want to keep up with you.
Larry at 12:31AM on Oct 2nd 2007
2. Cheers, God Bless
Manfred at 1:55AM on Oct 2nd 2007
3. Well, for political commentary, you can visit:
http://www.politidose.com/
Patrick at 7:39AM on Oct 2nd 2007
4. Godspeed Sir.
Randum at 8:13AM on Oct 2nd 2007
5. Well it was great writing along side with you. And you are NOT an idiot.
Sandra at 8:14AM on Oct 2nd 2007
6. Thanks for the good final post Scott. I too thought AOL was trying something new by having left and right on the same blog and maybe closer to the election they'll try it again. Altho we differ, it's great to be around bloggers who are Civil. Best Regards, Phil
phil bailey at 10:19AM on Oct 2nd 2007
7. Sorry to see this go. Did not always agree with Scott but more on the side with David Knowles. But at least it gave equal opportunity to all opinions.
David S. at 2:47PM on Oct 2nd 2007
8. Sen. Biden is listed on the previous page as Sen., Md. Isn't he from Delaware, not Maryland? Hello AOL?
Nam at 6:52PM on Oct 2nd 2007
9. This blog is over?
Then I won't post.
Brian at 10:48AM on Oct 3rd 2007
10.
Scott, if you should happen to find yourself in Las Vegas sometime in the future, look me up. The drinks will be on me. (You have my e-mail address.)
Derek
vegastracon at 2:14PM on Oct 3rd 2007
11. Given that the right wing side of this blog was little more than regurgitated Karl Rove, I can't say it will be missed.
Richter at 12:49PM on Oct 4th 2007
12. ok, well that was kind of mean...
Liz at 12:10AM on Oct 8th 2007
13. Hmph, at least you could have defined what victory in Iraq means before you turned tail.....
Ventrue at 11:08AM on Oct 10th 2007
14. Well Ventrue, if you read what I wrote, I didn't "turn tail", I was turned off by AOL.
OK, since you asked, here's the definition of victory in Iraq:
For anyone who likes our military, freedom, and is not suffering from an acute case of Bush Derangement Syndrome it is a stable democracy that can sustain a growing economy without succumbing to internal strife and external forces. In other words, a flourishing, somewhat liberal democracy akin to Turkey.
For anyone who hates the country and thinks we are the most vile nation to ever exist, people such as you Ventrue and your idiotic brethren at D-Kos, MoveOn and MyDD victory is the complete embarrassment of US forces in Iraq, more deaths to our soldiers because it helps you politically in 2008, the destruction of Iraq as any type of sovereign, liberal democracy, oil rocketing above $150 per barrel (that way us gas guzzlers will drive less and protect Mother Gaia) and if you're really lucky, the destruction of Israel. All in all, a moonbat wet dream.
Does that explain it in simple terms you can understand dude? I hope so, if not, e-mail me and I'll draw it out in crayon (using only primary colors so as not to confuse you too bad).
Scott at 11:28AM on Oct 10th 2007
15. Well said Scott!!!!
Larry at 12:17PM on Oct 11th 2007