Can newly-elected Ted Strickland help the Democratic presidential candidate carry Ohio in 2008? It's a fair question, and Reid Wilson from the RealClearPolitics blog seems to think the answer is yes.
By far the most common criticism was that I had omitted the most obvious choice: Ohio Gov. Ted Strickland. The newly-elected governor and former long-time congressman was subjected to the veep treatment by Chris Cillizza and Shailagh Murray in the Washington Post a few weeks ago, and would be a big help for any Democrat hoping to win Ohio.
...
-- Finally, Strickland is arguably the most popular Democrat in Ohio, save perhaps John Glenn. Ohio is perhaps the most important state, electorally, to a presidential contest. With an historically weak Democratic Party that is only now rebuilding itself, state Democrats need someone at the top. With Strickland's solid presence, the party can work to regain seats in the legislature and take out several Republican members of Congress it has targeted in recent years. In the long run, Strickland as Governor does more for the Democratic Party than Strickland as Vice President.
Ted Strickland is a good match for Ohio. Inoffensive and kind of bland. Just like the state. But could he help carry Ohio? Maybe, but there's a big risk. The truth is that Strickland is still very much untested in a big heavy statewide campaign. In 2006 he ran against the Republican establishment and painted his opponent Ken Blackwell as part of it. Blackwell let him. As the former Governor Taft had a 15% popularity rating, it was a walk in.

Governor Taft, not content with a 