Search Results for Mitt Romney

Mitt, Dubya, and Loyalty

Republican Mitt Romney"It's not personal, Sonny. It's strictly business." ~ Al Pacino, "The Godfather"

Mitt Romney has shown similar ruthlessness in disposing of his connection with scandal-embroiled Sen. Larry Craig.

"Once again," Pat Buchanan quoted Romney as saying, "we've found people in Washington have not lived up to the level of respect and dignity that we would expect for somebody that gets elected to a position of high influence. Very disappointing. (Craig is) no longer associated with my campaign."

Romney broke a pretty significant bond. As PJB detailed: "Up to this week, Craig was one of only two senators to have come out for Mitt Romney. He headed up the Romney campaign in Idaho. He vouched for Mitt in Congress and the country."

The former Bay State governor thus seems like an anti-George Bush in terms of standing by his lieutenants. Dubya stuck up for ex-Attorney General Alberto Gonzales. "Throughout Gonzales' sometimes rocky tenure, Bush had defended him, accusing his detractors of playing politics," ABC News reported.

Which is the better policy, staying loyal to a supporter or dismissing them when they misstep? Romney will find out as the primaries progress.


Mitt Romney's Evolution


A funny thing happened at last week's debate between candidates for the Republican party nomination. When asked for a show of hands on who did not believe in evolution, Mitt Romney abstained and kept his paws on the podium. In other words, he signified that he did believe in Charles Darwin's elegant description of the origin of species.
%Gallery-2838%
Well, it is no secret that Romney has been courting Christian conservatives. This past weekend he gave the commencement address at Pat Robertson's Regent University. It's quite a balancing act, really, considering that Robertson's own Christian Brodcasting Network has declared Mormonism a cult.
The candidate and his Christian supporters have been working hard to overcome Evangelical antipathy toward the teachings of the Church of Jesus Christ of Latter Day Saints, whose 19th-century founder, Joseph Smith, said he revised parts of the Bible to correct it.
But his statuesque demeanor at the debate regarding his views on evolution have caused some evangelicals to seek further clarification on where the candidate stands on the matter of the earth really being only 6,000 years old. In response, Romney's campaign has released a statement:
"Governor Romney believes both science and faith can help inform us about the origins of life in this world."
It's classic Romney. Vague, wishy-washy, and will further the perception that he is constitutionally incapable of taking a stand on a controversial issue and sticking to it. The question for the former governor is, what happens when science seems to contradict a matter of faith, as in the case of the age of our planet? Furthermore, how do we decide who is right when two faiths disagree on bedrock cosmological questions? Your evangelical constituents want to know, Mr. Romney.

The Mitt Romney Code

Mitt Romney stood atop his soapbox yesterday and shouted "States' rights!" over and over again. And as you can see from a recent interview with a Nevada television station, the ceding of power from Federal to local control would seem to extend, in Romney's mind, to the topic of abortion.

So then how do we square this idea with his other recent statements that there should be an amendment to the constitution banning the practice of abortion? If he views abortion as murder, then clearly states like Nevada or New York or California should not be allowed to practice the procedure. Pregnancies caused by rape? Incest? Why make exceptions for them? After all, or so the thinking goes, doesn't a second crime simply compound the first? Moreover, how does Romney reconcile the seeming discrepancy between the States' Rights view and his proposed Federal ban on abortion? From today's Washington Post:
Top Romney advisers insisted yesterday that their candidate's statements on abortion this month were consistent with each other. They say Romney supports a two-step process in which states get authority over abortion after Roe v. Wade is overturned, followed eventually by a constitutional amendment that bans most abortions.
So there you have it. Romney's for Big Government, after all. That States' Rights talk is all a smokescreen. He's dead set on a national dictate that makes it illegal for teenage girls who get pregnant to do anything other than carry the child to term. What else would Romney like to make illegal for the citizens of the United States? How about birth control? Never mind that abstinence only education has been shown to be a farce. The Baltimore Sun recently ran an article detailing Mitt's distinction between egg fertilization and implantation:
Mr. Romney's code, deciphered, meant, "I, like you, hope to reclassify the most commonly used forms of contraceptives as abortions." In fact, he told the crowd, he already had some practice redefining contraception: "I vetoed a so-called emergency contraception bill that cave young girls abortive drugs without prescription or parental consent."
You see, Dr. Romney believes he knows more about physiology than The American College of Obstetricians and Gynecologists, who define life starting at the implantation of a fertilized egg into the mother's womb. After all, if the egg does not implant, the fetus has no possible viability. Whatever your beliefs on abortion, there's simply no denying that Romney has no business spouting off about States' Rights when it comes to this issue.

Frustrating Day for Mitt

Big development on gay marriage in Massachusetts:

Today, in response to a Mitt Romney-backed lawsuit, the Supreme Judicial Court ruled that it could not make the state legislature consider an anti-gay marriage amendment. Legislators had twice postponed considering the amendment.

"While the seven-member SJC rebuked lawmakers in today's decision for using a procedural maneuver to avoid a vote," the Boston Globe reported, "the court acknowledged that it could not legally intervene."

Romney's term as governor ends Jan. 4. Will Mitt press the issue further ... or will he have other plans?


Mitt Pledges Prez Salary to Charity

From MSNBC:
A former venture capitalist who headed the 2002 Winter Olympics and served one term as Massachusetts governor from 2003 to 2007, Romney is the wealthiest of all the candidates, Democrats and Republicans. His assets are estimated at $190 million to $250 million.

Later, speaking with reporters, Romney said he would likely accept the presidential salary of $400,000 annually but donate the money. While governor, Romney declined his $135,000 annual salary.

Pulling out my handy windows calculator let me see... multiply $200,000,000 by a conservative growth rate of about 7% per year, and we see that his wealth throws off about $14 million a year. Every year.

So yeah, in the grand scheme of things, he would barely notice the $400,000 presidential salary. The other side of this story is that it highlights that Mitt Romney is quite wealthy, by anyone's standards and while not quite a billionaire, he's not far short of that status.

Trusting Mitt Romney

The question is, why on Earth would you? If history is a guide, Mr. Romney seems to show a propensity for changing his mind and going back on the promises he makes while campaigning. Whenever I've written about Romney's chameleon-like tendency--be it on his flip-flop on abortion, or his relationship with Ted Kennedy--Mitt's supporters cry foul. What's so wrong with changing your mind? they ask, as if they'd never vilified John Kerry for his own evolving mind-set.

Sure, a person, over time can have a change-of-heart on a host of issues and still claim to be intellectually honest. Such an argument is harder to make, however, if that person happens to be courting the conservative wing of the Republican party, and seems to be embracing a new-found strictness on matters such as immigration, abortion, and homosexual marriage. Why? Because the same man, Romney, sounded a whole lot different when he was campaigning for the votes of a constituency that was a lot more liberal back in 2002.

Mitt Romney seemed comfortable as a group of gay Republicans quizzed him over breakfast one morning in 2002. Running for governor of Massachusetts, he was at a gay bar in Boston to court members of Log Cabin Republicans.

Mr. Romney explained to the group that his perspective on gay rights had been largely shaped by his experience in the private sector, where, he said, discrimination was frowned upon.
Mitt Romney promised the group of gay Republicans that he'd "keep his head low" on the issue of gay marriage. He'd adhere to whatever the state court decided on the matter. Then, after Romney was elected and the Massachusetts supreme court later handed down its verdict legalizing same-sex marriage, Mitt promptly broke his word and began calling for a constitutional amendment that would ban the unions.

I guess if you are really conservative, you can console yourself with the notion that Romney finally saw the light. But what evidence do you have the Mitt won't turn around and do to you what he did to those log cabin Republicans at the bar.

Both-Ways Bob Endorses Multiple Choice Mitt

If your campaign is already tarred by allegations that you change principles about as often as underwear, would you really want to pick up this endorsement?
Former U.S. Rep. Bob Beauprez of Colorado endorsed fellow Republican Mitt Romney for president Wednesday. Beauprez, in a mass e-mail, said Romney had the right "political philosophy" as well as the experience and leadership skills necessary to be president.
Beauprez became known in Colorado as "Both-Ways Bob" because of his tendency to understand both sides of an issue so well that he would try to advance them both simultaneously. Since Mitt Romney is already tarred with the "Multiple Choice" moniker, getting an endorsement from Both Ways may not be exactly helpful.

Mitt: The Other Businessman

New York City mayor Michael Bloomberg, whose defection from the Republican Party might signal a presidential run, has been the subject of press coverage regarding politician-CEOs, like President Bush. Some politicians emphasize it more than others.

It appears that Mitt Romney is de-emphasizing his time at Bain Capital, instead focusing on social issues and making sure he sounds suitably right-wing. That's probably a good idea, given that Ted Kennedy made Mitt look heartless during the 1994 Senate race.


Mitt, Jeb Add Up to GOP Victory

Will Mitt Romney pick Jeb Bush as his presidential running mate in 2008? The Boston Herald seems to think so. As reporter Kimberly Atkins writes,

"'There has been substantive talk between the two of them' about the possibility of the president's younger brother running for vice president if Romney wins the nomination, one GOP source with knowledge of the Oct. 19 meeting (between Romney and Bush in Florida) told the Herald,"

To my mind, this move, and only this move, would ensure a Republican hold on the presidency. John McCain's bipartisanship, and Rudy Giuliani's pro-choice views, would mean lukewarm party support. Jeb Bush would be a dream choice for Mitt: a dedicated pro-lifer, a magnet for Southern votes, a man who can speak to "values voters."

A Mitt-Jeb ticket would keep the White House closed to Democrats for four more years. No one else comes close.


An Edge for Mitt, Hillary, Edwards

Standing up on your soapbox and giving a speech is a necessary part of politics. But so is exchanging your opinions with opponents, and this is where Mitt Romney, Hillary Clinton and John Edwards could pick up a crucial advantage in the 2008 presidential race.

All three candidates have significant debating experience. Mitt is a veteran of two bruising series of debates in Massachusetts – one from his failed 1994 Senate run against Ted Kennedy, the other in his successful 2002 gubernatorial campaign. Hillary outlasted Rick Lazio in the 2000 New York Senate race. And Edwards got national exposure when he debated Vice President Dick Cheney in 2004.

OK, I'm not arguing that these debates were a reprise of Lincoln-Douglas, Kennedy-Nixon, or even ... sigh ... Bush-Gore. Mitt's liberal stance in 1994 may hurt his chances for 2008, Hillary faced an opponent of weaker abilities than Rudy Giuliani, and Edwards' performance against Cheney sounded akin to the New York Yankees' struggles against the Boston Red Sox that year.

Still, each candidate emerged from these experiences familiar with what it's like to defend their views and denounce those of their opponents. That's an invaluable skill for anyone who wants to win a presidential campaign.


Romney Won't Be Macaca'd

Mitt Romney was quick to address the YouTube video buzzing around the blogosphere of his 1994 Senate debate with Ted Kennedy. This is a clear sign that Mitt Romney has surrounded himself with people who know how to play the internet game, and Romney will not let himself be "Macaca'd" like George Allen was... David All is clearly impressed.


AdWatch: Romney 'Tested, Proven'

Mitt Romney also has a new TV spot out today. The gist of it? If the former governor of Massachusetts can wield his brand of "conservative principles" there, he must be able to do so anywhere. Give it a watch below, and get more details from AP:



The narrator of "Tested, Proven" intones: "In the toughest place, Mitt Romney's done the toughest things." The spot will run in Iowa, New Hampshire and South Carolina and is one of three early ads Romney will run this month. Do you think it's an effective commercial? Leave your comments below.


Romney Ahead in New Hampshire

Mitt RomneyA recent Rasmussen poll has Mitt Romney ahead in New Hampshire. Romney is receiving support from 26% of those polls and the trio of Rudy Giuliani, John McCain and Fred Thompson receive about 17% each.

A couple of weeks ago, I noted that Romney is doing well in the early primary states. Momentum is a wonderful partner. As Romney wins, the money will flow in. Furthermore, it seems that the real loser will be Rudy. If he can't win in the east, it may effect his standings nationally.

Fred Thompson will do well in the South and Rudy may find himself riding the McCain Express down to the bottom of the pack. Romney may change his positions for the occasion but it is working. People like what he is saying ....now.

This could wind up being a race between Thompson and Romney.


Mitt, Country Music and Gay Rights

Divisiveness over gay rights, once exploited by Karl Rove and company in 2004, could be turning into harmony soon.

One symbol of this harmony may be country music. Last Valentine's Day, the Dallas Morning News reported on "Cowboys Are Frequently Secretly Fond of Each Other," a pro-gay-rights song by country star Willie Nelson. The Morning News quoted Alan Pierce, the co-owner of a Texas gay country bar: "It acknowledges it as a reality in life. It could help straight America acknowledge this."

Just as the idea of gay marriage has faced opposition through state bans, so did a previous pro-gay country song, Garth Brooks' "We Shall be Free," meet with disapproval.

"Though it didn't focus exclusively on gays, the tune stirred some controversy; some radio stations across the country wouldn't play it," the Morning News reported. "'We Shall be Free' peaked at No. 12 on Billboard's country singles chart, ending a string of Top 10 hits for Mr. Brooks."

Thanks to the efforts of stars like Garth and Willie, Republican candidates like Mitt Romney may have to find other issues to manipulate if they want to get elected.


Romney Wins CPAC Straw Poll

Mitt RomneyMitt Romney has won the CPAC Straw Poll, and that they had the biggest number participating in the straw poll in CPAC history.

Here are the first choice results:
  • Romney 21
  • Giuliani 17
  • Brownback 15
  • Gingrich 14
  • McCain 12

Combined first and second choice:
  • Giuliani 34
  • Gingrich 30
  • Romney 30

Next Page >

Coming Soon

Most Recent Comments

Presidential Race News

    Politics Video

    HST protest

    HST protestNative HST protest snarls Toronto traffic

    Smitherman to run for Toronto mayor

    Smitherman to run for Toronto mayorSmitherman to run for Toronto mayor

    Rebagliati will run

    Rebagliati will runSnowboarder Rebagliati slides into politics

    Snowboarder slides into politics

    Snowboarder slides into politicsSnowboarder Rebagliati slides into politics

    Miller won't seek 3rd term as Toronto mayor

    Miller won't seek 3rd term as Toronto mayorMiller won't seek 3rd term as Toronto mayor







    News Search
    AOL News

    Elections Blog

    Read the latest election news stories around the U.S. on AOL News. From congressional and gubernatorial elections to the latest local election results, we deliver the information you need.

    © 2009 AOL LLC. All Rights Reserved.
    AOL@News © 2009 AOL LLC. All Rights Reserved.
    BACK TO TOP
    Blogsmith