DarylDad 09:12:54 PM Mar 23 2008

I think it's good for them to sell photos to the magazine's that want to exploit their lives in magazines. As parents it gives them an agreement and some control over their articles and photos and sets a precedent not to hassle and steal photos. If they want access to Marc and JLo's lives, then they can request and negotiate the conditions. It's terribly rude that the paparazzi intrude into starts "free" time.

terryag4 03:31:53 PM Mar 22 2008

There both beautiful............ I have twin boys... but when its a boy and a girl how blessed and lucky can ya get... GOOD LUCK!

kitkat7243 10:29:23 PM Mar 20 2008

wat the heck is j.lo serious? she named her kid maxamilian. wy the heck would she do that? its like the nickname "max-a-million" thats a nickname, not meant to be a real name. but i support her if thats wat she wanted 2 name her kid. and is her daughter emme's name pronounced "ehm-ee", or "ehm-uh"?

wrobert528 08:22:22 AM Mar 16 2008

my niece had a baby girl named lana alice in jan 4th 2008,and my other niece will have baby in may 2008?

alyssaraeeeeex1 07:22:03 PM Feb 26 2008

i kinda do agree with qtana0616 if u reasd my last comment yeah but wat eva now but good for them! they r no jerks at all

alyssaraeeeeex1 07:20:45 PM Feb 26 2008

it is unbelivable i just think omg 6 mil already and their names are max and emme

fayleenmid 11:21:08 PM Feb 25 2008

i can't believe how rude you people are. if these magazines want to pay the money then what is the big deal! I'm sure If you were in thier shoes you would sell your childs photo too. Don't condem unless you've been there!!!!!

emia52 03:18:33 PM Feb 25 2008

Congrats. to J Lo and Marc! Blessed you and your babies
which i am sure are beautiful. But I do agreed that $6 million
for baby pics are too extreme, especially when there are so
many children in the world and people for that matter, who are
dying because of diseases and nothing to eat, that is totally
outrageous, think about it and please use some of your money
to help poor, sick people around the world.

NYYGirl940 07:13:01 PM Feb 24 2008

i totally agree w. sasha123k, someone like angelina jolie who has done TONS of charity work has a right to sell her stupid baby pics for $6 million dollars, because most likely some of it will go to good cause. J LO and that ugly ass she calls a husband marc anthony dont give a crap about other people. they probably have never donated a cent in there lives. i personally like J LO, but i really think she has absolutely no right to sell her baby pics (her babies will probably turn out down right UGLY like her husband) for that $ mainly becuz she will probably just keep it all for herself.
other then all of that, congrats!

NYYGirl940 07:12:26 PM Feb 24 2008

i totally agree w. sasha123k, someone like angelina jolie who has done TONS of charity work has a right to sell her stupid baby pics for $6 million dollars, because most likely some of it will go to good cause. J LO and that ugly ass she calls a husband marc anthony dont give a crap about other people. they probably have never donated a cent in there lives. i personally like J LO, but i really think she has absolutely no right to sell her baby pics (her babies will probably turn out down right UGLY like her husband) for that $ mainly becuz she will probably just keep it all for herself. my friends brother is a paparazzo and regularly follows celebrities around, and he says J LO and marc are among the top rudest and most annoying. so maybe instead of keeping that $6 million for yourself like every other dollar you've ever earned, J LO, why not donate to save darfur or something worthwhile like that.
aside from all the insults i just said, congrats