It's no secret to anyone who spends time on the internet that liberals talk a lot dirtier than conservatives. In public, anyway; I don't know whether this holds true in private conversation or not. Notwithstanding the fact that this is common knowledge, there has been a lot of buzz about this survey of liberal and conservative sites. It begins with the "seven words you can't say on television," and purports to count how many times those words appeared on 18 of the top liberal and 22 of the top conservative blogs. The result was striking: liberals used the "bad" words 18 times as often as conservatives.
That didn't really surprise me, but when I looked at the chart that set forth the results of the survey, I found that 68 instances of the "seven words" were recorded for Power Line. This struck me as obviously wrong. I'm certain that six of the seven words have never appeared on Power Line at all, and the seventh (a four-letter word that starts with "s") has appeared only a time or two when we were quoting someone else.
So I ran the search on Power Line the same way it was done for the survey. What I found was that virtually all of the references that came up were in "trackbacks." This means that the language appeared on someone else's site, not ours.
I conclude from this that the survey was pretty badly flawed. Not only did it fail to distinguish between blog entries and comments, which is at least defensible, it failed to distinguish between words used on the site in question, and words used on a different site, which is not defensible.
Having said that, I think the original point still stands, even if this survey does not precisely quantify it. There is no doubt that many liberals often use offensive language on the web, while conservatives rarely do. Some of this probably has to do with age; many liberals who write on the web are just kids, so immaturity is not surprising. I think some of it has to do with anger; liberalism, in today's political world, is closely associated with anger and, in far too many cases, hate. And I think that to some degree, it is symptomatic of the sloppy thinking that is common on so many liberal web sites. It is, after all, a great deal easier to string swear words together as an insult, than to string ideas together logically, as an argument.
UPDATE: This post generated a surprising number of comments, most of them from liberals who argued 1) that liberals cuss more on their web sites because they have more to be angry about, which confirms the point I made in the last paragraph of my post, or 2) that it is contradictory for me to say that this survey's methodology was flawed, but the conclusion that liberals use more bad language on their web sites is nevertheless true. The latter is a logical error of such stunning proportions that it tends to confirm my observation that sloppy thinking is common on the left.
Mo's Blog Roll
Resources
Seven Words We Don't Use
Mo's Video
The Sound of a Smoke-Free Barack...Almost two years ago we speculated on how Barack Obama's voice would change if he stopped smoking. ...
Most Popular Stories
- Don't Like Goodbyes...
- Pittsburgh Steelers: Is it Time to get some Cheerleaders?
- How NOT to give an Oscar Acceptance Speech
- Could Jim Belushi Win the Nobel Peace Prize?
- Spring Break Sexy T-Shirt Removal Training!
- Quest for the Crown 5: Plastic Wrap to Make you Less Fat!
- Quest for the Crown 4: Work Those Heels!
Most Commented On
-
Coming Soon
Recent Comments
- Roert Dean on General Clark is Absolutely Right!
- Saint Brian the Godless on Obama and the Reagan Doctrine
- Saint Brian the Godless on Obama and the Reagan Doctrine
- Saint Brian the Godless on Obama and the Reagan Doctrine
- Saint Brian the Godless on Obama and the Reagan Doctrine
- Saint Brian the Godless on Obama and the Reagan Doctrine
- Saint Brian the Godless on Obama and the Reagan Doctrine
Mo's Bio
Mo Rocca appears on a bunch of shows, including CBS News Sunday Morning (with the indescribably wonderful Charles Osgood), The Tonight Show on NBC, and NPR's Wait Wait... Don't Tell Me! He's a sometime judge on Iron Chef and was featured on Telemundo's Amore Descarado. Last year he starred on Broadway in the 25th Annual Putnam County Spelling Bee. His expose "All the President's Pets" was published by Crown in 2004.
Top News Headlines
Political Machine Blog
- Poll Shows Christ and Conservative Challenger Tied in Florida Senate Race
- OK, Let's Talk About Race
- Iowa Students Feel the Pinch of University Budget Cuts
- New Health Vote Math Gets Worse For Reid
- Mary C. Curtis Discusses Anthony Foxx, Charlotte's New Mayor
- Obama Gets Better Marks Than Democrats or Republicans on the Economy
- You Can't Judge a Princess by Her Tiara


Reader Comments ( Page 3 of 3)
31. Liberals have more to cuss about.
Jim Floyd at 12:10PM on Mar 2nd 2007
32. Liberals have more to cuss about.
Jim Floyd at 12:12PM on Mar 2nd 2007
33. The mutual appreciatiation circle blog of the Right seems to have gotten their "panties bunched" (
Andy Kasehagen at 10:09PM on Mar 2nd 2007
34. All PowerLine is satire (intentionally, I hope).
Janus Daniels at 2:32PM on Mar 2nd 2007
35. Uh, John, remember when YOU wrote this:
"You dumb shit, he didn't get access using a fake name, he used his real name. You lefties' concern for White House security is really touching, but you know what, you stupid asshole, I think the Secret Service has it covered. Go crawl back into your hole, you stupid left-wing shithead. And don't bother us anymore. You have to have an IQ over 50 to correspond with us. You don't qualify, you stupid shit."
Funniest part: The guy you wrote it to didn't swear at all. He simply critiqued a very critiqueable piece of yours. And you went all potty-mouth on him.
Thom at 7:47PM on Mar 2nd 2007
36. It's interesting how the host refuses to allow people to post comments which quote STATEMENTS HE HAS MADE. Isn't it?
The Appropriate Response at 3:17PM on Mar 2nd 2007
37. I give up.. Why would anybody care???
Steve at 4:39PM on Mar 2nd 2007
38. Could it be that liberals are just mad as h*** about a president that has killed over 3000 American lives, and God only knows how many innocent Iraqi's, while letting the real criminals go completely free. And anyone that was in chatrooms and reading blog sites during the Clinton Monicagate, knows the author above is completely full of crap.
JEFF at 4:45PM on Mar 2nd 2007
39. Hinderacker doesn't need no stinking methodologically rigorous study to tell him what he believes about liberals is correct- he has the whole wingnut blogging echo chamber to confirm his beliefs. Hinderacker is like many modern Rethuglicans- faith-based idiocy where science doesn't mean squat. Global warming- doesn't exist, evolution- ain't gonna happen, and so on and so on.
Redleg at 5:39PM on Mar 2nd 2007
40. AOL has have lost their mind. In the past they at least tried to "hide" their leftist bias, now they just come straight out with their liberal propaganda... for a moment I thought I was back in Socialist Eastern Europe where I was born & raised, and the flashbacks are almost scary.
Bo at 5:16PM on Mar 2nd 2007