Two suicide bombers blew themselves up today among a crowd of Shia pilgrims headed for Karbala, and 93 more Iraqis were killed. All of this gives the impression that Iraq is in the middle of a religious war. Some pundits have even suggested that the Shia and the Sunni have been fighting for centuries, this fighting will continue into the indefinite future, and America should not be in the middle of this but should get out of Iraq sooner rather than later.
But the Shia and the Sunni have not been fighting for centuries. In fact, for most of Muslim history they have not been fighting at all. Two decades ago Shia and Sunni Muslims were shoulder-to-shoulder in the trenches, laboring together to drive the Soviet Union out of Afghanistan. Even in Iraq, the clashes between the Sunni and the Shia are not based on religion.
So why are they fighting?
The short answer is that you need a mafia to do it. You need a group of henchmen numbering in the thousands who will run every department of government, not to mention every school and post office and bank. And where do you find such men? You go to your home town of Tikrit, and recruit among your own tribe, which happens to be Sunni.
So the Sunni Baathists ruled Iraq for more than two decades, and now they have been pushed out, not only because of the ouster of Saddam but also because of de-Baathification. And the other guys, the Shia majority, are now running the country thanks to democracy. The Sunnis who have lost their jobs and authority are drawn to the insurgency, and there is a battle between the two groups for who is going to rule Iraq. It's a battle over power, not religion, and it's not going to go on indefinitely: chances are one side will win.
The question for America is whether we are going to back the winning side, in which case there will most likely be a pro-American government in Iraq, or whether we are going to get out, in which case there will almost certainly be an anti-American government, no matter who wins the tribal conflict.
The insurgents are setting fire to mosques and attacking pilgrims for the simple reason that they know this is the best way to inflame passions, and stoke the flames of confusion and conflict. Chaos is their best hope for chasing the Americans away, and for enabling the alliance of Al Qaeda and dethroned Baathists to seize power.



Reader Comments ( Page 1 of 1)
1. Just this year, 30,000 Shi'a and Sunni prayed together in Multan Pakistan during the Shi'a holy day of Ashura. Kind of takes the air out of the entire Muslim on Muslim violence meme.
Ali Eteraz at 11:05PM on Mar 6th 2007
2. Your insights seem to be always right on the mark.
Herb Krueger at 7:06AM on Mar 7th 2007
3. Sunnis and Shia fought together to drive out the infidel from Afghanistan. In Iraq, the battle is over who will control the country, Sunni or Shia, knowing, as they most certainly do, that the US truly has no intention to rule Iraq. The distinction between the two groups is inherently religious. This, therefore, is most certainly a religious war. Moreover, the war we are trying to police is the same religious war, even if we don't see it as such.
Peter at 3:30PM on Mar 9th 2007
4. Saddam was a Baathist... and Baathist are Sunni... and the majority of northern Iraq is occcupied by the Sunni... and there are few natural resources in northern Iraq... and the majority of natural resources are in central and southern Iraq... and the majority of central and southern Iraq is comprised of Shia... and the (former) Baathist want to be in power again... catch where this is going? I know shia and sunni can get along... because I was there and saw it up close and personal... but when you have terrorists (commonly referred to as insurgents) from with-in the country and Iran... stirring up the secular violence... it's hard for anybody over there to forgive and get along. BTW... Iran also wants Iraq... not just for the natural resources and strategic value... but also for it religious signifigance. Ever heard of Babylon?
jlhj at 7:20PM on Mar 15th 2007