Anyway I just got off a plane in Salt Lake City where I'm taping NPR's Wait Wait ... Don't Tell Me tonight. I didn't sleep much last night, but even through bleary eyes I couldn't help but notice at one of the airport terminal newsstands the headline on this week's People Magazine: Jen's New Man.
In the past I've chosen to believe that Jennifer sincerely wants to find happiness. If this is the case, an intervention is in order.
Let's be blunt: How in the hell does she expect to find happiness with this guy? Jennifer needs someone will love her for who she is and empathize. But, forgive the cliche, she also needs someone to "complete" her and open her up to the world outside her depressingly shallow and cloistered (maybe even paranoid) version of the world.
My immediate thought was: She should date an engineer. An engineer from Cal Tech. Yes, "Friends" was a wildly popular TV show. But at its height it was regularly watched by 40 million people. America has 300 million people. Surely there are a lot of successful attractive people who never saw Friends and are only vaguely aware of who she is. An engineer from Cal Tech who never watched Friends (at least intentionally) could be perfect.
Naturally he'd want to catch an episode in syndication with her after they'd begun dating. He'd be interested in why she gets mobbed wherever she goes. He'd be mildly amused by the episode, maybe only because it would be a kick to see his girlfriend in a goofy sitcom. More importantly, once the episode was over, he'd suggest they go on a hike or make pizza or have sex. And he'd probably never watch another episode. This would put Jennifer's fame in perspective, something she needs. She'd be surprised, and ultimately grateful for, the casualness with which her Cal Tech engineer boyfriend would treat her career.
It was my intention to ask readers if they had any leads on single Cal Tech engineers. (If you do, please write and let us know!) But then Susan Kropf, the director of development for Salt Lake City public radio station KUER, picked me up outside the airport. (KUER is the host for this taping of Wait Wait ... Don't Tell Me.)
I immediately raised the topic of Jennifer's male model misfire. Susan agreed that Jennifer and the model are destined to fail. And guess what? Their sex is and will remain lousy for the duration of their liaison. Presumably they'll have mirrors on their ceiling so they can worship themselves, Susan pointed out. (I love when public radio people get randy.)
I told Susan that I have it on good authority - and I do - that a certain former Miss America who is married to a ridiculously good looking guy has been complaining that her husband insists on inviting a third person in whenever they have sex. Apparently these two beautiful people (who may only be together because they're both beautiful) can't find satisfaction with just each other. (By the way the former Miss America is not Kate Shindle, currently starring in Legally Blonde: The Musical and a very nice person.)
Anyway Susan is married to a scientist and let's just say it sounds like her marriage is great. She thinks that Jennifer should date a scientist, specifically an ecologist. So I've expanded my alternatives for Jennifer to Science and Engineering, two closely related departments. Either way, Jennifer will discover how big the world really is. And so...



Reader Comments ( Page 1 of 4)
1. e2I found real hot Britney Spears Nude video :) Enjoy..
..
http://sexy-tube-world.net/view.php?Britney_Spears_Nude
..
..
msselrkyuf at 10:27AM on Jan 24th 2009
2. I hate celebrity gossip but I suppose I will comment. I have personally disliked every sitcom or movie that Aniston has starred in aside 'Office Space' where she dates a bohemian average joe played by Ron Livingston. As for this Paul Sculfor, I could care less. I hope this relationship explodes and Aniston goes back to doing what she does, making mediocre movies and dating other guys who look good without their shirts on. And so the circle of life.. for celebrities at least continues.
Sincerely,
Blayze C. O'Brien
bobrien at 6:27PM on Jun 14th 2007
3. I definitely value brains over beauty. But then there are those who are blessed with both, like a certain gentleman with a blog I enjoy reading and commenting on.
As for Jennifer, I had hoped that her pretty boy addiction ended after her "Pittfall". She showed signs of recovery when she was with Vince Vaughn.
But alas, a relapse.
I vote for either the ecologist, engineer or nuclear physicist. She's way too high maintenance for a high school science teacher.
giftedgirl at 6:53PM on Jun 14th 2007
4. Do middle aged freelance writers (not a script writer) count? If so, I'll try to save her!
Martin at 8:05PM on Jun 14th 2007
5. i agree w/ bobrien...i didn't like her in anything but 'office space'
lmai83 at 8:06PM on Jun 14th 2007
6. Yeah! Mo's back on Wait Wait, I love that show.
Rion at 9:35PM on Jun 14th 2007
7. Sorry, but I have always thought that she and Johnny Reznik (Goo Goo Dolls)should be together! He is a musical genius so that should count for something! Plus he is really good at staying out of the limelight so maybe he could teach her how to do that too!
ddd at 8:15PM on Jun 15th 2007
8. WHO CARES ABOUT JEN WHEN OUR SOLDIERS ARE BEING MURDERED IN IRAQ.
Wayne at 8:19PM on Jun 15th 2007
9. Gotta agree with Wayne!! Why do people obsess over this celebrity nonsense when this world's in such a terrible mess?? I personally couldn't care less who Jennifer dates. Her happiness (or lack thereof) isn't gonna effect me one way or the other. Leave the girl alone because I, for one, am sick to death of hearing about her. You'd think she was a member of the royal family!!! NOBODY CARES!!! ENUF ALREADY!!!
Debbie at 12:56AM on Jun 16th 2007
10. From the little I've read about her, Jennifer sounds like she's a nice person. I wish her happiness. However, her fame baffles me. She has no talent, cannot act at all. Her movies have been terrible, largely because she sleep-walked through them. How in the world is she being offered movie roles with her lack of talent??? I do not understand... But back to the subject at hand, I doubt very seriously that an intellectual would appeal to Jennifer. She seems to need glitz to be happy.
Barbara at 8:34PM on Jun 15th 2007
11. Hey Wayne and Debbie - why did you spend the time reading the article and then taking the time to comment on it if you were so uninterested? Just wondering.
Deb at 9:10PM on Jun 15th 2007
12. Simple question to answer.She needs to marry ME.I will then spend the rest of my life thanking God for it.LOVE YOU JEN!
Mike Currin at 9:12PM on Jun 15th 2007
13. Who cares about Jennifer Aniston. She is ugly and cannot act so find someone else to talk about
Jean Bradley at 9:38PM on Jun 15th 2007
14. Who cares about Jennifer Aniston> She cannot act and she is not pretty.
jJean Bradley at 9:44PM on Jun 15th 2007
15. i do not think jen will ever get married again. she messed up with the most beautiful man in the world brad just by not wanting kids, she is to vain and to much into her self
annette at 2:07PM on Jun 16th 2007