The Bible tells Christians not to be of the world, sharing its distorted priorities, but it does call upon believers to be in the world, fully engaged. Many Christians have abdicated this mission. They have instead sought a workable, comfortable modus vivendi in which they agree to leave the secular world alone if the secular world agrees to leave them alone. Biologist Stephen Jay Gould proposed the terms for the treaty in his book Rocks of Ages when he said that secular society relies on reason and decides matters of fact, while religious people rely on faith and decide questions about values. Many Christians seized upon this distinction with relief. This way they could stay in their subculture and be nice to everyone.
But a group of prominent atheists-many of them evolutionary biologists-has launched a powerful public attack on religion in general and Christianity in particular; they have no interest in being nice. A new set of antireligious books-The End of Faith, The God Delusion, God Is Not Great, and so on-now shapes public debate. These atheists reject the Gould solution. They say that a religious outlook makes specific claims about reality: there is a God, there is life after death, miracles do happen, and so on. If you are agnostic or atheist, you have a very different understanding of reality, one that is formed perhaps by a scientific or rationalist outlook. The argument of the atheists is that both views of reality cannot be simultaneously correct. If one is true, then the other is false.
The atheists have a point: there are not two truths or multiple truths; there is one truth. Either the universe is a completely closed system and miracles are impossible, or the universe is not a closed system and there is the possibility of divine intervention in it. Either the Big Bang was the product of supernatural creation or it had a purely natural cause. In a larger sense, either the secular view of reality is correct or the religious view is correct. (Or both are wrong.) So far the atheists have been hammering the Christians and the Christians have been running for cover. It's like one hand clapping.
This is not a time for Christians to turn the other cheek. Rather, it is a time to drive the money-changers out of the temple. The atheists no longer want to be tolerated. They want to monopolize the public square and to expel Christians from it. They want political questions like abortion to be divorced from religious and moral claims. They want to control the school curricula, so that they can promote a secular ideology and undermine Christianity. They want to discredit the factual claims of religion, and they want to convince the rest of society that Christianity is not only mistaken but also evil. They blame religion for the crimes of history and for the ongoing conflicts in the world today. In short, they want to make religion-and especially the Christian religion-disappear from the face of the earth.
The Bible in Matthew 5:13-14 calls Christians to be the "salt of the earth" and the "light of the world." Christians are called to make the world a better place. Today that means confronting the challenge of modern atheism and secularism. My new book What's So Great About Christianity, which is just hitting the stores, provides a kind of tool kit for Christians to meet this challenge. The Christianity that is defended here is not "fundamentalism" but rather traditional Christianity, what C.S. Lewis called "mere Christianity," the common ground of beliefs between Protestants and Catholics. This Christianity is the real target of the secular assault.
I have written this book not only for believers but also for unbelievers. Many people are genuine seekers. They sense there is something out there that provides a grounding and an ultimate explanation for their deepest questions, yet that something eludes them. They feel the need for a higher sense of purpose in their lives, but they are unsure where to find it. Even though they have heard about God and Christianity, they cannot reconcile religious belief with reason and science: faith seems unreasonable and therefore untenable. Moreover, they worry that religion has been and can be an unhealthy source of intolerance and fanaticism, as evidenced by the motives of the September 11 terrorists. These are all reasonable concerns, and I address them head-on in this book.
This is also a book for atheists, or at least for those atheists who welcome a challenge. Precisely because the Christians usually duck and run, the atheists have had it too easy. Their arguments have gone largely unanswered. They have been flogging the carcass of "fundamentalism" without having to encounter the horse-kick of a vigorous traditional Christianity. I think that if atheists are genuine rationalists they should welcome this book. It is an effort to meet the atheist argument on its own terms.
Nowhere in this book do I take Christianity for granted. My modus operandi is one of skepticism, to view the claims of religion in the same open-minded way that we view claims of any other sort. The difference between me and my atheist opponents is that I am skeptical not only of the irrational claims made in the name of religion but also of the irrational claims made in the name of science and of skepticism itself.
Taking as my foil the anti-religious arguments of prominent atheists like Richard Dawkins, Sam Harris, Christopher Hitchens and the others, What's So Great About Christianity shows the following: 1) Christianity is the main foundation of Western civilization, the root of our most cherished values. 2) The latest discoveries of modern science support the Christian claim that there is a divine being who created the universe. 3)
If you want to read more about the book, check out my website dineshdsouza.com



Reader Comments ( Page 7 of 36)
91. "It is reasonable to have faith."
Faith mean abandoning reason and accepting doctrine.
Joe Bob at 5:20PM on Oct 12th 2007
92. "Atheism, not religion, is responsible for the mass murders of history."
Hitler was not an atheist, for example.
Joe Bob at 5:25PM on Oct 12th 2007
93. "Atheism is often motivated not by reason but by a kind of cowardly moral escapism."
Empty, unsupported insult.
Joe Bob at 5:29PM on Oct 12th 2007
94. "Either the universe is a completely closed system and miracles are impossible, or the universe is not a closed system and there is the possibility of divine intervention in it."
Non sequitur. The universe will always be "mysterious" in that humans will never be able to totally explain it. Divine intervention explains nothing.
Joe Bob at 5:33PM on Oct 12th 2007
95. "They want to discredit the factual claims of religion"
DD, do you mean that things like a virgin human female giving birth, a guy coming back to life a few days after dying and then zapping up into the sky a few weeks later, wine *poof* becoming blood (but still tasting like wine...), etc. etc. are facts?
Joe Bob at 5:49PM on Oct 12th 2007
96. "I think that if atheists are genuine rationalists they should welcome this book. It is an effort to meet the atheist argument on its own terms."
You would stoop to anything to sell your book. No thanks.
Joe Bob at 5:54PM on Oct 12th 2007
97. #36 Captain says: "Where is most of this "name calling" and hatred coming from on this board?
Uber-christian, "ray-two-truths."
Capeetan, maybe you missed the fact that the first ten posts on this subject, are from Christian bashers, same as for any topic involving Christianity. You haters trip over yourselves to get the first word in on these posts.
I swear you can see vapor trails coming off of posts 1-10, but Christians are the "haters and name callers???"
Lizard at 6:29PM on Oct 12th 2007
98. Laurie in regard to this "loving" Judeo-Christian God you speak of. Some of us don't quite see it that way but see your clouded wishes that he be that moreover than is. First of all don't you feel deep down inside a twinge of uncertainty about that? If this God did exist then he has schizo borderline personality disorder at best. It is the conditions of love he sets for "us" and the penalty he imposes for even questioning the rational behind this divinity. If God is there and created the entire universe and anything beyond then he is a very smart powerful thing. Don't you think its a bit rediculous to think that he puts us here to "believe" in him or he will kill you if you don't? Not what I will worship for sure
JOHN R HABIB, M.D. at 6:45PM on Oct 12th 2007
99. My dad was an atheist...
I was commenting(hehe) to him that theists used to know how to make an atheist 'see' GOD ... it involved a red-hot poker and a place to put it, but I didn't actually say what place...
... perhaps my dad did have as vivid an imagination as a Christian...
... he 'knew'... he just 'knew' where 'the place' was.
pboyfloyd at 6:46PM on Oct 12th 2007
100. Before making an entry on this blog, please indicate if you did, or did not, read the book. CK
CK at 6:48PM on Oct 12th 2007
101. Oh, yea... urging all theists to 'give that a go'... and 'let me know how it works out'...
... surely 'seeing GOD' is worth it...
.... right Loser'd?
pboyfloyd at 6:51PM on Oct 12th 2007
102. Hey, CK... I imagine that it is patently obvious which commenters would be likely to have read DD's drivel....
... perhaps you are 'retarded' tho'... so let me explain a simple fact... you... are...not... the ... boss... of ... anybody... here....
got that, dipshit?
pboyfloyd at 6:55PM on Oct 12th 2007
103. this is the same guy who "dated" ann coulter...both are goof balls.....right wing nuts who spout off ridiculous statements to sell their books to the religious freaks.
rkw at 7:02PM on Oct 12th 2007
104. Just like the accident on the corner. Ten people
give half a dozen descriptions to what they saw.
One God but many people giving their opinions on
the matter.
An 'eye for an eye' doesn't infer this means it
MUST be done, but rather no more than that, as far
as I see it. I guess most people interpret the
statements they hear the way they want it to sound.
I sometimes wonder if the bibles I've read are the same as what others have perused.
I understood Jesus' comment was 'I am the way'
but many will quote "I am the ONLY way". I've
looked through several Bibles, in two different
languages, and for some reason couldn't find the
inference to 'only'.
If we listen carefully to many people talking on various parts of the bible, I notice through subtle additions or omissions this is not uncommon.
I may be wrong about atheists and agnostics.
I understand atheists have proof there is no God.
Agnostics are not sure and question the existence of God.
Steve
Steve Golder at 9:18AM on Oct 13th 2007
105. My AGNOSTIC belief has 3 parts:
First: We die and that is it....we resume no presence..or,
Second: We die and resume our presence in the same place before our birth and we recognize and know it well.
Third: Knowing that neither one of these can ever answer that burden of infinity and settle this as perhaps the signature of a God that doesn't want us to know. The reasons I have no clue.
JOHN R HABIB, M.D. at 7:10PM on Oct 12th 2007