On Friday, November 30, I debated philosopher Daniel Dennett at Tufts University on the topic, "Is God a Man-Made Invention?" This was my third debate against a leading atheist, following my debate with Michael Shermer at Oregon State University and my debate with Christopher Hitchens at the Ethical Culture Society in New York. The auditorium at Tufts filled up so quickly prior to the Dennett debate that the organizers had to have a second overflow room where viewers could watch the fireworks on a big-screen TV. (You can watch the full debate here.)
Dennett surprised me a little by showing up with a power-point presentation. I hadn't agreed to this in advance, but I didn't object. I thought to myself, "I'm not sure what advantage slides are going to give him in a format like this one." Dennett spoke first for 25 minutes, and sure enough, he made full use of those slides. He had quotations from me up there, and he challenged me to defend them. I was impressed by Dennett's preparation, and also by his avulcular "grandpa" style, an effect enhanced by his white Santa beard. Atheism is a grim philosophy, but Dennett more than anyone else makes it seem harmless and even charming.
Normally I would use my opening statement entirely to make the case for God's existence. But I didn't want Dennett's allegations to go unrebutted for too long. So I devoted the first five minutes to puncturing some factual and historical holes in Dennett's argument. Then I proceeded to make my case. Of course I conceded that religion is a man-made invention, but I argued that modern science has over the past century produced remarkable discoveries that affirm and support the argument for God's existence. In doing so I recognized that I was challenging Dennett not only on his home campus, Tufts university, but also on his home turf, which is a philosophical atheism rooted in science.
We each had two five-minute rebuttals which produced lively exchanges about the Big Bang and about whether the universe is fine-tuned for life. Then there was a lengthy question-and-answer session. Given that the audience was mostly made up of Tufts students sympathetic to Dennett's atheism, a majority of the questions was directed at me. Most memorable for me was the philosophically-minded savant who pooh-poohed the possibility of God's existence on the basis of what he called the Principle of Parsimony. He argued that either propositions are true by definition, or they are true by empirical verification. If a proposition cannot satisfy either criteria, then it is meaningless. Since God does not exist by definition, the young man insisted, and since we cannot verify His presence empirically, clearly God has been refuted by the Principle of Parsimony.
I asked our undergraduate savant to apply his twofold test to the Principle of Parsimony itself. Is it true by definition? No. Well, can it be verified empirically? Again, no. Therefore by the student's own criteria the Principle of Parismony is worthless and can be cast aside. The student had no comeback to this and neither did Dennett.
So who won the debate? That's for you to decide. You can watch the whole thing here, and then you can cast your vote on the resolution and on who came out on top.
Watch the videos of the debate after the jump.Part 1:
Part 2:
Part 3:
Part 4:
Part 5:
Dinesh's Blog Roll
Featured Bloggers
| Ada Calhoun | |
| Ben Greenman | |
| Dinesh D'Souza | |
| Jeff Hoard | |
| Mo Rocca | |
| Young Turks |
RSS Feeds
Resources
Dinesh D'Souza
Reports
Bestselling author DINESH D’SOUZA’s latest book is What’s So Great About Christianity. read more
Is God a Man-Made Invention?
Posted Dec 2nd 2007 11:22PM by Dinesh D'Souza
Filed under: Science, Christianity, Controversy, Atheism
Filed under: Science, Christianity, Controversy, Atheism
Add your comments
Please keep your comments relevant to this blog entry. Email addresses are never displayed, but they are required to confirm your comments.
When you enter your name and email address, you'll be sent a link to confirm your comment, and a password. To leave another comment, just use that password.
To create a live link, simply type the URL (including http://) or email address and we will make it a live link for you. You can put up to 3 URLs in your comments. Line breaks and paragraphs are automatically converted — no need to use <p> or <br> tags.
What's So Great About Christianity
Dinesh D'Souza's acclaimed New York Times bestseller, What's So Great About Christianity, is in stores. Order now!Top Tags
WhatsSoGreatAboutChristianity RichardDawkins YoungTurks BarackObama adoption GeorgeW.Bush RaceRelations MarkSanford WeekInReview WolfBlitzer Flobots MagicWand TheView n-word JohnMccain SportsReporters FreeMarkets NeutralReporting CenkUygur Jolie-Pitt EconomicPolicies gay cnn revenge ObjectiveReporting OilPrices EconomicMess WhoopiGoldberg Handlebars Madonna birth GovernorSouthCarolina media Jonny5 chessboxing HelixHigh regulation ElizabethHasselbeck
Most Popular Stories
Most Commented On News Bloggers
- How I Became So Modest (320)
- The Dogma of Materialism (256)
- Obama's Pearls of Unwisdom (222)
- George Bush Brings Out His Magic Wand Again (156)
- McCain Doesn't 'Believe' In Gay Adoption (125)
- It's Time To Start Making Fun of Obama (108)
- Bush Administration Continues to Comply With Religious Right. Why is Anyone Surprised? (101)
Recent Comments
- web jones on McCain Doesn't 'Believe' In Gay Adoption
- Dedmanrisn on Elizabeth Hasselbeck and Whoopi Goldberg Have Emotional Race Discussion
- Bill on Elizabeth Hasselbeck and Whoopi Goldberg Have Emotional Race Discussion
- Renzo on The Dogma of Materialism
- not-pboyfloyd on The Dogma of Materialism
- Bill on The Dogma of Materialism
- Dave Martin on McCain Doesn't 'Believe' In Gay Adoption
Top News Headlines
Ada Calhoun |
Ben Greenman |
Dinesh D'Souza |
Jeff Hoard |
Mo Rocca |
The Young Turks |


Reader Comments ( Page 44 of 44)
646. Dennett's original presentation was okay, but his rebuttals were hesitant, scrambled, and vague. I could have delivered a far more cogent defense of atheism than he did. And I'm a Catholic.
That having been said, although I sympathize with Mr. d'Souza's point of view, I wish he were less shrill and confrontational. I really think he would convince more people if he *sounded* more reasonable.
Mike Koenecke at 12:50AM on Dec 10th 2007
647. mr D"Souza who Escribio the BIBLE whay you have been able to respont to me this question
Rafy at 2:55AM on Dec 12th 2007
648. Mr. D'Souza, I would be curious what your slant on the Christian crusade against the Albigesians would be.
JefFlyingV at 4:41AM on Dec 12th 2007
649. Frist off, if you believe in the Bible then, it say's we are created in God's image. We are not God. So we have no right to judge this fellow or other's like him or anyone for that matter. By doing so we are not believing in God. Life is about knowlegde of God and knowing that we are not nembre uno or number one. Let other's believe what they wan't and if they choose to believe in the future the door will be open
danny at 7:02AM on Dec 13th 2007
650. Great debate Dinesh, I watched the whole thing. You did very well...I would only advise you to put your tone down a tad.
Frank at 5:45PM on Jan 16th 2008
651. God exist, dude. We just went down to Crenshaw blvd. and bought an oz. of weed. He said he is sorry for letting little Jimmy blow up on a land mine in Bosnia, but he was totaly wasted.
BX at 12:09AM on Apr 6th 2008
652. ? - Who Needs Absurd ‘Beliefs’ - ?
Reflections of an Octogenarian.
Religiosity? – Throughout life, I’ve never regarded this subject as deserving of any serious thought - - -
However, with quietus in the offing, the excessive religious coverage in the media inevitably agitates the neurons.
Of late, these irritants have provoked a thorough reappraisal - - - & has utterly confirmed natural intuition!
Logical conclusions after a lifetime of listening (inadvertently) to the delusive portents of various ‘Faiths’.
A simple story. No need for the meandrine moonshine of ‘erudite intelligentsia’.
Just take yourself back in time & examine unvarnished facts.
Please acknowledge that the primitive mind was bound to generate quite naturally, mythological imagery of an Elysian nature.
Also, one must accept that the relative ignorance of early Humanity, coupled with understandable fears of the unknown, provided those individuals seeking power over their fellows (a natural human trait) with the conditions to set up as
Medicine-Men - Witch-Doctors - Sorcerers - Soothsayers - et al, all claiming to have insights & contact with a ‘power’ - of sorts. So began the blight of Shamanism - - - leading on to airy-fairy religions.
As time unveils the past, these facts have not yet been fully appreciated; the ensuing rash of religiosity has not been branded for what it really is - - - An early conceive - of ignorance & apprehension - - -
Perpetuated thro millennia by IMPOSTORS - Preying on credulous naivety.
The natural process of evolution, via many devious pious paths, has now landed us with the present crop of
Archbishops - Ayatollahs - Rabbis - Popes - Imams - JWs - & a host of other hypocritical sect leaders, incessantly brainwashing the largely unthinking masses with their ridiculous & childish ‘Holy Beliefs’. The Billy Grahams of the world, gifted with gab & showmanship, use their ‘bewitching powers’ to prey on the gullibility of the artless. Yes indeed, in modern form, the Witch-Doctors are still at it! - - - Mountebanks All!
With it’s initiation as above, religiosity can’t be recognised by any sane person to have the gravitas necessary for any authentic ‘Belief’. Seeking reality is anathema to the pious ones. They critically comment on facts of life that are painstakenly unearthed by the practical hard-working talents of seekers of truth. Knowledge of physics & biology would never have advanced if left to the ‘Holiest of Holy Men’ men. Sun would still be orbiting Earth. The dim past is their’s, with mystical rites that are still prevalent, complete with modern trappings. They are an absurdity! Their endeavours to exalt religiosity by the erection of ever more imposing ‘Places of Worship’ merely highlights – Monumentally – the benighted phases of Man’s past. - - -
Hell’s Bells! - - - What a shambles!
Weighing up the World-wide situation, a substantial proportion of Humanity are unable to let go of their forebears’ primitive ‘belief’ in a Creator that demands a daily dose of supplication. A person’s specific ‘belief’ is dictated by that part of the globe from where they originated; a simple inheritance of the parents’ unreal ancestral teachings, largely unquestioned! No need to be a ‘Religious Scholar’ (what a fatuous preoccupation) to comprehend why all of this utter humbug survives.
Persistent indoctrination over millennia leave the susceptible with feelings of unease when they attempt to ditch the ingrained silly ‘beliefs’ inherited from similarly programmed forebears. Most take an apathetic route & run with the various childish theosophical myths passed down through the generations via pious, shallow-thinking naivety - preferring illusion to reality - fantasy to truth.
It has always been decreed that our only way forward is in the utilizisation of everyday experience & research - ie
pure evidential communal common-sense. The need to consult Biblical, Qur’anic, or any other ancient crap-laden fairy tales in order to pursue a decent & considerate existence beggars belief. As with everything, ethics evolve naturally. Man-made ‘Gods’ & ‘Prophets’ are clearly surplus to requirements!
The facts listed above are beyond dispute – Theism? / Divinity? – Absolute Man-made hokum! Any thinking person realises that the Universe is truly an awesome Quantum / Astronomical creation. As part of that creation, our attempts at it’s full understanding seem futile. Whether probing the Atom or ‘Heavenly’ Space, we’re contemplating Infinities. Fouling up our minds with a rag-bag of archaic religiose twaddle does nothing to help enlighten our ignorance!
Anyone taking this farcical subject seriously has to be absolutely pickled in traditional folklore and/or in a sad mental state. Using it’s bogus validity for an easy living and/or monetary gain, it’s impostrous practitioners must have no real conscience at all. Far too much reverence is devoted to the abstract of religiosity. Vast volumes of impotent bombastic rhetoric has been generated by self-righteous con-men who use their dominant & deceitful acumen to sublimely charm others to wander in an unreal ‘Spiritual Wonderland’ that is totally unworthy of any honest contemplation!
A rational response to the ‘standard’ questions posed by Alpha & similar organisations - - -
What is the point of life?
Need there be a ‘point’. Nature instructs all of life to reproduce; to what end, we just don’t know & it’s almost 100% certain that we never will. We can speculate, but are infinitely short of the necessary knowledge to form a valid judgement!
Certainly, life’s purpose cannot be identified by any ancient decrepit ‘Belief’!
Nature, red in tooth & claw, is pitilessly indifferent to an individual’s quality of life; the fittest for any environment prospers. Individual quality of life is a lottery. We have arrived & must make the best of it. Self-deceivers pray for Ethereal help; none is discernable - - - Quite definitely a DIY job!
We live, utilising facts that the experience of life plus research, provides!
The paralogism of religious charlatans can’t match the knowledge we now possess, scant though it be. Mystical Theosophy is drivel of the first order.
What happens when we die?
Starkly, when the brain ceases to function, that ‘being’ ceases to ‘be’.
The motivation driving that unique combination of elements is no more!
A ‘Spiritual Future’ ????? - - - Pure self-indulgent fantasy!
The chemo-electrical activity of the brain – the mind – is naturally prone to generate any illusive mirage.
If that imagery is not backed up by factual proof, it remains a fantasy.
To give any credence to life after death, one must be round the bend, if not well up the straight!
Natural cognition (common sense), affirms life’s future as solely dependent on reproduction!
Is forgiveness possible?
With almost limitless mutations possible, the evolutionary process can be expected to produce individuals with characteristics of an exceedingly complex gradation, in a myriad of aspects – eg - - -
Brilliant to Thick – Jovial to Morose – Benign to Sadistic – Hetero to Homo – ad inf.
Religions provide a very accessible dump for the perceived guilt generated by the various indiscretions to which all humans must, in some respect, be victim. The evolution of life cannot be fault-free. We learn as we live.
Forgiveness from on high is a concept that is, quite evidently, ludicrous in the extreme!
Do not kid thyself – No one is immaculate!
Those gifted with conscience & a degree of ‘normalcy’ just have to live with the unfortunates & scallywags; amongst
the latter - the ‘Con Men’ - enjoying a very comfortable living with their pretentious ‘Divine’ prognostications!
Further thoughts
With the barbarous & brutal acts of differing factions, the mutiplicity of silly ‘Beliefs’ has always been a handicap that
humanity can well do without. - - - Common sense must prevail!
As the sponge-like mind of an infant readily absorbs info, authentic or fallacious, in teaching the necessary basics of life, the follies of illogical & delusory religions should be emphasized - - - Strongly!
Offspring should be brought up from birth unprimed with needless pestilential ‘beliefs’ - - - Glaringly Obvious!
Preachers pontificate on a subject so ‘Holey’, it is artlessly transparent. Visualise it’s benighted origins & it’s quite obvious that the early human mind was bound to generate mythological imagery of an Elysian nature & from there, receptive, fanciful & predacious minds took over. ‘Beliefs’ were surely born of ignorance & fear of the unknown! With this realisation, why can’t we all recognise simple basic facts & treat all ‘faiths’ of today as ever they really were - - -
Dogmatic preservation of irrational early thought.
In this more enlightened age - Pure Phantasmic Godswallop!
The Rt Rev Fred Flintstone & his contemporaries should have dug themselves out of the Stone-age long long ago!
The Past is unveiled thro time.
We should Benefit from it - not Perpetuate it! - - - - - A m e n
Bill Davison at 3:43PM on Jul 19th 2008