A wonderful way to celebrate Darwin's birthday, learn more about him and/or watch a documentary about the old man, may I suggest the Darwin Legacy documentary from UKTV? It's pretty sciency and probably even boring for most, so perhaps a quick Henry Rollins Intelligent Design rant for the religion/science debaters out there.




Reader Comments ( Page 1 of 2)
1. Its cool to know Darwin was an Aquarius! Happy birthday!!
mani at 7:37PM on Feb 12th 2008
2. i love rollins.
i think i still have a few black flag records stored away somewhere.
thanks jeff.
enoch at 8:04PM on Feb 12th 2008
3. Under god was added to the pledge in 1954, due to the 'red scare'. It was not originaly in the pledge. Why is it so controversial to suggest removing it from the pledge? We no longer fear communism, take it out.
mac at 8:31PM on Feb 12th 2008
4. I'd pay to see Henry debate DD.
BOB JOHNSON at 8:41PM on Feb 12th 2008
5. Is Henry an Atheist?
The Ugly American at 8:50PM on Feb 12th 2008
6. I hope this birthday works out better for Darwin than that real bad one back in 1965. Endora turned him into a toad.
Clif Kuplen at 10:49PM on Feb 12th 2008
7. Actually Clif, that was Darrin Stephens. But that's OK, since Endora never got it right either ! LOL
As far as the Science vs. Religion debate, I try to hold a middle ground. I feel both should be able to coexist together peacefully.
But that takes a mind that is open to give and take, and most religions do not allow any amount of openmindedness on the subject.
It's always "GODS WAY OR THE DAMNATION HIGHWAY" for these folks, and only their own "MAP" (BIBLE, QUI'RAN, TALMUD,ect)will get you to the promised land.
All other "MAPS" will deviate from the only true route to salvation (West Virginia ?) and you'll end up in Pittsburgh on RT.51 after a Steelers game (loss)lets out.
(Hell on wheels ?)
The trouble is, all these "MAPS" were written in ancient times, and they don't include millenia of social and scientific progress by the human race.
Maybe it's time for the worlds great Religions to release new versions of their Operating Systems, a sort of "stained glass Windows '08"
Maybe the "Maps" printed off these new operating systems will be a bit more intelligible and easier to update and integrate with all the other "MAPS" from around the world.
How about a King William version of the Bible in a few years, eh ?
BILL G at 7:49AM on Feb 13th 2008
8. Boy, it feels like just yesterday we believed man was created out of dirt by an angry invisible man.
----------------------------
Jeff Hoard
---------------------------------------------------------
Holy claymation Batman !
BILL G at 7:58AM on Feb 13th 2008
9. How about a King William version of the Bible in a few years, eh ?
BILL G at 7:49AM on Feb 13th 2008
xxx
I want a King Curtis version.
Clif Kuplen at 12:49PM on Feb 13th 2008
10. Holy claymation Batman !
BILL G at 7:58AM on Feb 13th 2008
xxx
whoa! you aren't MISTER Bill, are you? what happened to sluggo?
Clif Kuplen at 12:50PM on Feb 13th 2008
11. Funny as hell Bill and Clif.
Enjoy your blogs Jeff Hoard.
JefFlyingV at 2:45AM on Feb 14th 2008
12. Ooooh nooo! He's gonna be mean to me!
Strados at 11:42AM on Feb 15th 2008
13. Darwin never addressed the topic of his book title.
His disciples should, 150 yrs after, answer the Intelligent Design arguments to make any progress.
DNA is language, characters selected just so to represent a reality. That takes a conscious mind. This is the information age. It's ok to answer now. Or is the "theory" not a proven fact as alleged?
queman at 12:30PM on Feb 15th 2008
14. #13 - queman - huh? I will answer the Intelligent Design argument? Just because Man has not yet provided a complete and comprehensive analysis of evolution does not prove a competing theory. That theory must stand on its own.
DNA is a language? Characters selected just so to represent a reality? What are you trying to say? It's not coming through.
To explain the scientific method once again...There are no proofs in science, only in mathematics. Science provides a theory to best fit the observations. When an observation cannot be explained by the theory, the old theory is shown to be incomplete and it is modified. The refinement goes on forever.
alan at 5:36PM on Feb 15th 2008
15. I pray Henry is right.
jscotthhi at 8:43PM on Feb 16th 2008