News Bloggers

Right Policies for the Wrong Reasons

Posted Jun 18th 2008 11:35AM by David Koller
Filed under: Young Turks, Environment

Gasoline prices continue to rise, pinching American consumers. It's becoming a major political issue, and could soon become an economic crisis. What is the Bush/McCain solution? Offshore oil drilling in the United States. Even if you think this makes sense, it's the latest example of implementing a policy for the wrong reasons.The issue of the day is whether to lift the Congressional and Executive bans on off-shore oil drilling in the United States. President Bush made a Rose Garden statement supporting a repeal of the ban, and John McCain has made it an issue in the presidential campaign. I am going to throw a bone to so-called "conservatives" who have inexplicably been duped by the oil industry lobby into thinking that ExxonMobil and other big companies care about them; I am going to concede, for the purposes of this post, that there are valid reasons to drill for off-shore oil. (It hurts to write that.) Nevertheless, I adamantly oppose lifting the ban. Why? Am I a stubborn eco-ideologue? No. I just object almost every time to doing the right thing for the wrong reason.

Many on the Democratic/progressive/liberal side like to puff their chests out and proclaim how strongly they supported the US invasion of Afghanistan. I cringe every time. When the Taliban took over and condemned all women to a life of enslavement, some military action might have been justified, with an international consensus. When they destroyed the giant Buddhist statues, some military action might have been justified. But to invade the country only when a band of terrorists based there attacked the US on 9/11/2001 I feel is vengeful, largely unjustified and definitely unwise. The revenge motive leads to acts of retribution, like the horrendous US detention and torture policies that grew from the Afghanistan action. Attacking out of revenge encourages the American population to feel that once we hit them back and slap them around a bit, that's all we needed to do to send a message. Meanwhile, without a serious, long-term commitment and without enough troops, chaos reigns in Afghanistan and the Taliban is resurgent. In Afghanistan today we are witnessing the effects of the right policy for the wrong reason.

With the fear that global warming is destroying the planet, calls for limiting emissions of greenhouse gases continuously grow. Tighter restrictions of industrial emissions to the atmosphere and more protection of the Earth's forests are wonderful ideas that I support whole-heartedly. But, I believe more restrictive standards should be imposed to reduce pollution, curtail the potentially devastating effects of the under reported phenomenon of ocean acidification, to reduce fuel consumption and to make industry more efficient in general. As I've written in two previous posts, I am not impressed by the urgency of Global Warming and I believe that imposing strict emissions standards to reverse Global Warming would be the right policy for the wrong reason.

Finally, back to offshore oil drilling. Bush, flip-flopper John McCain, and flip-flopper Gov. Charlie Crist of Florida are claiming that we need more offshore oil drilling because gasoline prices are too high. This reasoning is preposterous. It would take years for these new supplies to affect the market, many studies think the volume of crude would not be enough to significantly lower prices, and even if the new supply did reduce prices, this impact would be relatively short-termed. Modern society is facing a much broader energy crisis that requires a comprehensive, multi-faceted long-term solution, not a quick political gimmick. To conclude, I should write that offshore drilling to reduce the high gasoline prices that are pinching American consumers is the right policy for the wrong reason, except now that I'm done with this post I can remove the mask and decidedly proclaim that in this case, it's the wrong policy for the wrong reason, and that makes it an even worse idea.

Read more about this subject in this discussion at The Young Turks.

Reader Comments ( Page 1 of 2)

Add your comments

Please keep your comments relevant to this blog entry. Email addresses are never displayed, but they are required to confirm your comments.

When you enter your name and email address, you'll be sent a link to confirm your comment, and a password. To leave another comment, just use that password.

To create a live link, simply type the URL (including http://) or email address and we will make it a live link for you. You can put up to 3 URLs in your comments. Line breaks and paragraphs are automatically converted — no need to use <p> or <br> tags.

New Users

Current Users

Mo's Video

America's Strongest Man?
No, this isn't a swipe at Sarah Palin. It's my interview with Strongman Competitor Gerard...

Featured Galleries

Geeks Who Got Paid
Ms. New Jersey
Paris Grub
Love Objects
Arctic Ocean Species
The Queen's Visit
Strange Photos
War in Iraq
Photo of the Day
 




MORE ON AOL Mail | Search | Music | Movies | MapQuest | Travel | Sports | Entertainment | Games
Site Map | Help

Young Turks

Find breaking news, raw opinions and powerful insights on Young Turks at AOL News Bloggers.

© 2008 AOL LLC. All Rights Reserved.
AOL@News © 2008 AOL LLC. All Rights Reserved.
Blogsmith
BACK TO TOP