This July 4 comment is adapted from my book What's So Great About America. For more information on that or my other books, go to dineshdsouza.com
America is today the most loved society in the world--and the most hated. At a time when we are constantly lectured about our nation's flaws, it is useful to be reminded of the other side of the story. This July 4 weekend, it's worth thinking about what this country does right. The forgotten truth is that America
is still the most attractive society in the world, and its appeal is felt even by the children of the America-haters.
Whatever the flaws of American policy and American culture, let's remember that immigrants from every continent continue to brave dislocation and hardship to come to America
. Why do they do it? The conventional wisdom is that immigrants come to
for one reason: to make money. This notion is conveyed in the "rags to riches" literature on immigrants, and it is reinforced by 's critics, who like to think of America
as buying the affection of outsiders through the promise of making them filthy rich. But this Horatio Alger narrative is woefully incomplete; indeed, it misses the real attraction of Ameica
to immigrants, and to people around the world.
There is enough truth in the conventional account to give it a surface plausibility. Certainly America offers a degree of mobility and opportunity unavailable elsewhere, not even in
Europe . Only in America could Pierre Omidyar, whose ancestry is Iranian and who grew up in
, have started a company like eBay. Only in America
could Vinod Khosla, the son of an Indian army officer, become a shaper of the technology industry and a billionaire to boot.
In addition to providing unprecedented social mobility and opportunity, America
gives a better life to the ordinary guy than does any other country. Let's be honest: rich people live well everywhere. In fact if you are very rich, my advice to you is not to live in America
. The reason is that in most countries, but not in the United States
, money buys you the pleasure of aristocracy-the pleasure of being a superior human being. Americans, however, share a social ethic that is deeply egalitarian. Americans believe that no matter how much money Bill Gates has, he is not better than they are.
America's greatness is that it has extended the benefits of affluence, traditionally available to the very few, to a large segment in society. America is a country where "poor" people have television sets and microwave ovens, where maids drive rather nice cars, where plumbers take their families on vacation to
Europe . Recently I asked an acquaintance in Mumbai why he has been trying so hard to relocate to America
. He replied, "I really want to move to a country where the poor people are fat."
The typical immigrant, who is used to the dilapidated infrastructure, mind-numbing inefficiency, and multi-layered corruption of developing countries, arrives in America to discover, to his wonder and delight, that everything works: the roads are clean and paper-smooth, the highway signs are clear and accurate, the public toilets function properly, when you pick up the telephone you get a dial tone, you can even buy things from the store and then take them back. The American supermarket is a thing to behold: endless aisles of every imaginable product, many different types of cereal, fifty flavors of ice cream. The place is full of numerous unappreciated inventions: quilted toilet paper, fabric softener, cordless phones, disposable diapers, and roll-on luggage.
So, yes, in material terms America
offers the newcomer a better life. Still, the material allure of
does not capture the deepest source of its appeal. Recently I asked myself how my life would have been different if I had not come to America
. I was raised in a middle-class family in India
. I didn't have luxuries, but I didn't lack necessities. Materially, my life is better in the United States
, but it is not a fundamental difference. My life has changed far more dramatically in other ways.
Had I remained in India
, I would probably live my entire existence within a modest radius of where I was born. I would undoubtedly have married a woman of my identical caste, religious and socioeconomic background. I would face relentless pressure to become an engineer, like my father; a doctor, like a couple of my uncles; or a computer programmer. My socialization would have been almost entirely within my ethnic community. I would have a whole set of opinions on religion and politics and society that could be predicted in advance. In sum, my destiny would to a large degree have been given to me.
By coming to America
, I have seen my life break free of these traditional confines. At
Dartmouth
College, I became interested in literature, and switched my major to the humanities. Soon I developed a fascination with politics, and resolved to become a writer, which is something you can make a living doing in America, and which is not easy to do in India
. I married a woman of English, Scotch-Irish, French, and German ancestry. Eventually I found myself working in the White House, even though I was not an American citizen. I cannot imagine any other country allowing a non-citizen to work in its inner citadel of government.
In most of the world, even today, your identity and your fate are largely handed to you. This is not to say that you have no choice, but it is choice within given parameters. In America
, by contrast, you get to write the script of your own life. What to be, where to live, whom to love, whom to marry, what to believe, what religion to practice-these are all decisions that, in America
, we make for ourselves. Here we are the architects of our own destiny.
Some critics, both in
and abroad, have noted that this freedom to shape one's own life is not an unmixed blessing. Freedom can be used well or badly. Some Americans do indeed make mistakes with freedom, as the country's high divorce and illegitimacy rates suggest. These are unfortunate social trends, but we should remember that while freedom allows vice its scope, it also gives greater luster to virtue. It is no great achievement for an Indian couple to keep its marriage together, because the social stigma against divorce is prohibitive. By contrast, American couples who stay married deserve greater credit because they have chosen the good when the good is not the only practical option.
Those who have tasted the exhilaration of freedom-which entails responsibility for one's own choices and one's own life-can hardly imagine living in any other system. The core American idea is the "pursuit of happiness," which means that happiness is not a guarantee, but that
you have a chance to find it for yourself. No wonder that so many young people throughout the world are magnetically attracted to what
America represents: they find irresistible the prospect of being in the driver's seat of their lives. So, too, the immigrant discovers that America
permits him to break free of the constraints that have held him captive, so that the future becomes a landscape of his own choosing.
Reader Comments ( Page 4 of 11)
46. This is actually a very nice article.
Happy 4th everyone!
Drink and don't forget to pass the joint!
goddess1prevail at 3:28PM on Jul 3rd 2008
47. I lived in Scotland for a year. At the time I thought it would be permanent, but later my Scottish husband thought he would like to give America a try. Well you can't know how much you love this place till you had to live elsewhere. I was so glad to be home. God Bless the land...and He will as long as we don't forget that HE honors those that honor HIM. By the way..hubby is applying to be a citizen this year.
Happy 4th everyone.
Heidi at 3:29PM on Jul 3rd 2008
48.
Somber,
Here here!!
T.Brough at 3:53PM on Jul 3rd 2008
49. Dinesh posted this same article last year I think.
And now for another OBJECTIVE moment:
"Logic dictates that if evolutionism is true and the eye was built incrementally over time from nothing to its present state of functional wholeness, then it must have at some point in the past been only half of an eye.
Only a moment's thought on this supposed ancestral eye lets us see that there would be problems: How would this eye be moved in its socket if it wasn't a smooth spherical shape? What would stop the seepage of light through the top? How would the lens keep from being deformed if it was not held equally on all sides? How would the eye jelly have kept from spilling out of the opened bowl of the half-eye?
The evolutionist's theory depends on each step in the gradual procession from nothing to wholeness be beneficial to the survival of the organism, but how could this half an eye be considered by even the most sympathetic observer to be functional much less beneficial? If we consider that the individual with these half-eyes was probably more susceptible to infections due to the exposed optical insides, then we must conclude that half an eye is a detriment to the individual's survival and therefore a whole eye could not have evolved."
Nice try :)
Mokele Mbembe at 4:20PM on Jul 3rd 2008
50. AOLWTFGOAD!
Mokele Mbembe at 4:28PM on Jul 3rd 2008
51. A very nice essay, especially coming from someone who was not born here. Thanks for sharing a perspective that many need to hear. Lets also remember, to quote a famous saying, that "Freedom isn't free", and this can all be lost if Americans give way to apathy and fail to remain alert to the dangers posed to the nation.Everyone is NOT our friend, everyone is NOT like us, and there ARE people out there who hate us and intend our destruction.
Leslie at 5:14PM on Jul 3rd 2008
52. Wow! just a fluff piece for the 4th! Well I'm glad, we will most likely be busy with friends and family and this is the perfect article that doesn't create a lot of chatter on the blog-o-sphere.
Happy 4th, well at least until you fill up with gas or go to the grocery store and feel our government at work. Yes, there is freedom - though - isn't there. The freedom to complain and to vote and to somehow have our say, no matter who does or doesn't agree with us.
Darwin bless us all.
TJ at 5:40PM on Jul 3rd 2008
53. Dinesh,
A wonderful article to read.
And I appreciate where you're coming from because I'm married to an asian and have been back to the motherland with her and I see the huge differences between living here and somewhere else in a 3rd world country.
Many of my in-laws live here and they very much appreciate living here. They work very hard and contribute so much to this country.
Sometimes, though, I wish my wife would let us move back to her homeland and live the simple life in a small village.
Well, sometimes!
A HAPPY, HOLY 4th of July to everyone!
Michael at 5:52PM on Jul 3rd 2008
54. Michael; I didn't see much difference between the US and Europe, but that's just me.
Mokele; ...GOAD?
Ryan Anderson at 6:07PM on Jul 3rd 2008
55. My, my, my, Hannah, you're just NASTY! In a good way. Happy 4th, my dirty darling!
Robert at 7:08PM on Jul 3rd 2008
56. Moke-
Dude, I'm having a REALLY hard time believing that all this OBJECTIVE stuff is REAL!
Please tell me they CAN'T be serious- please...
(whimper)
(POOF! Fizzle....SPLAT!)
Robert at 7:12PM on Jul 3rd 2008
57. Dear Michael-
"God Bless America!" LMFAO!
Robert at 7:13PM on Jul 3rd 2008
58. P.S. I told my wife about the "Laughing Jesus" thongy- and we agree...it would be more effective than abstinence!
Robert at 7:15PM on Jul 3rd 2008
59. I grew up in India and came to the US in 1970. I loved this country immediately. After a year, though, I began to miss India. I missed it for a year but got over that and have never been homesick since even though I still love India. How can one not love the place where one lives?
There are various turn offs about America (the US.) There were many turn offs about India, too. Some of the turn offs about India are those that D'Souza mentioned. Some of the turn offs about America those of the conservative right--keeping the rich rich, going to war in the name of 'democracy' and so on but the underlying motive being oil, power, and personal profit. There are many good things about America. We know them well. I love the decency of 'everyday Americans.'
I became a citizen of the US. Recently I've become more patriotic. It's because the world is reviling us somewhat. I find that hypocritical. Western Europe enjoys economic prosperity and freedom that are significantly preserved by America. It's not that their criticisms are altogether wrong but that a better approach might be to reach out and see what we share. I suspect that W. Europe and America have common enemies. First, we have economic 'enemies.' These are not enemies in the sense that they are against us but they compete with us economically. The main examples are India and China. I'm thinking that there has to be a solution that is good for the West and the East. Then there are other enemies. Islamic fundamentalism is one. I'm not sure of how powerful they are or will become. Russia is still a potential enemy. I'm not thinking that we should go out and wage war (nuke 'em) but we should maintain awareness of potential threat. There has to be a middle ground between the unawareness that allowed Hitler's aggression and trumping up excuses like WMD's in Iraq
I'm probably rambling. Patriotism is doing what's best for the country and standing against what's not. We can disagree and still be patriots
Anil Mitra at 7:35PM on Jul 3rd 2008
60. Happy and safe Fourth of July to DD and all the readers!
leesa at 7:54PM on Jul 3rd 2008