Who can take these guys seriously anymore? No Fox News "reporter" or "news anchor" should ever be hired in a real news station anymore. You don't agree, then watch this:
They've become a self-parody. "Fair and balanced" has become a synonym for "we do the exact opposite of what we claim."
Watch the Best Web Show Here and Best You Tube Channel Here
Mo's Blog Roll
Resources
Fox News Doctors Photos
Mo's Video
The Sound of a Smoke-Free Barack...Almost two years ago we speculated on how Barack Obama's voice would change if he stopped smoking. ...
Most Popular Stories
- Don't Like Goodbyes...
- Pittsburgh Steelers: Is it Time to get some Cheerleaders?
- How NOT to give an Oscar Acceptance Speech
- Could Jim Belushi Win the Nobel Peace Prize?
- Spring Break Sexy T-Shirt Removal Training!
- Quest for the Crown 5: Plastic Wrap to Make you Less Fat!
- Quest for the Crown 4: Work Those Heels!
Most Commented On
-
Coming Soon
Recent Comments
- MI on Obama and the Reagan Doctrine
- FL Chick on Jesus Statue Stolen By Dog Haters?
- andreawalker419 on Breastfeeding an Eight-Year-Old?
- Roert Dean on General Clark is Absolutely Right!
- Saint Brian the Godless on Obama and the Reagan Doctrine
- Saint Brian the Godless on Obama and the Reagan Doctrine
- Saint Brian the Godless on Obama and the Reagan Doctrine
Mo's Bio
Mo Rocca appears on a bunch of shows, including CBS News Sunday Morning (with the indescribably wonderful Charles Osgood), The Tonight Show on NBC, and NPR's Wait Wait... Don't Tell Me! He's a sometime judge on Iron Chef and was featured on Telemundo's Amore Descarado. Last year he starred on Broadway in the 25th Annual Putnam County Spelling Bee. His expose "All the President's Pets" was published by Crown in 2004.
Top News Headlines
Political Machine Blog
- New York Times Gift Guide for "People of Color"
- Pile-up in Aisle 3: What's With the Mom-on-Mom Violence?
- Beyond West Point: Congressional Authorization and Obama's Afghanistan Surge
- Old Time Religion Ain't What It Used to Be
- Sarah Palin's Early Christmas Gift: A Free Ride on Franklin Graham's Charity Jet
- In Copenhagen, Waiting for Obama
- Democrats Struggle With Democrats for Final Deal on Health Care


Reader Comments ( Page 7 of 11)
91. 89. "accepted. fire away foghorn."
You got it.
bob at 5:32PM on Jul 6th 2008
xxxx
???? I don't see any address. Do I smell chicken cookin?
Clif Kuplen at 5:41PM on Jul 6th 2008
92. "???? I don't see any address. Do I smell chicken cookin?"
Check your email.
bob at 5:43PM on Jul 6th 2008
93. Maybe he'll think twice next time he tosses off a flippant challenge.
Although somehow I doubt it.
bob at 5:20PM on Jul 6th 2008
xxx
the address, bob. where is the address. I accepted your challenge, print your address.
Clif Kuplen at 5:43PM on Jul 6th 2008
94.
I just checked my email bob. nothing. Why don't you just post it here?
Clif Kuplen at 5:45PM on Jul 6th 2008
95. Yeah, you're a real tough guy, challenging a great-grandfather from behind your keyboard. You throw a mean left pixel, tough guy.
Here is what you do. You create a hotmail account, post the email address and accept responses to your challenge. Then you abandon the addy after you have arranged to have yourself interviewed, arrested, or beaten to a pulp.
Personally, I hope you put your name and address out there. I know a journalist who would probably like to give you fifteen minutes of infamy.
You'd be like that guy last year who traveled across seven states to "get" his Internet challenger.
The guy stopped at every state line, to pose for and post a picture of himself at the border sign. Then, he threw a flaming piece of foam rubber through the window of the double-wide that his adversay lived in. 15 minutes of infamy.
You're looking to be that guy.
So put your name and address out there, bob. I could send some people around to ask you to explain yourself.
Captain Negative at 5:48PM on Jul 6th 2008
96. "the address, bob. where is the address. I accepted your challenge, print your address."
Email, Clif, email.
You didn't think I was gonna broadcast it out here myself, did you?
bob at 5:47PM on Jul 6th 2008
97. You didn't think I was gonna broadcast it out here myself, did you?
bob at 5:47PM on Jul 6th 2008
xxxx
if it shows up, it's my property. maybe you didn't think of that.
Clif Kuplen at 5:50PM on Jul 6th 2008
98. "Yeah, you're a real tough guy, challenging a great-grandfather from behind your keyboard. You throw a mean left pixel, tough guy."
I was responding to his challenge. All of a sudden he's now a frail great grandfather? Funny how when push comes to shove he's not so tough.
Clif, I mailed to your address j******i@aol.com. If you don't know how to retrieve your email that's your problem.
bob at 5:55PM on Jul 6th 2008
99. "if it shows up, it's my property. maybe you didn't think of that."
Clif I'm pretty familiar with what you can do and can't do with an address.
Whether you are or not remains to be seen.
bob at 5:58PM on Jul 6th 2008
100. You guys knock it off, this isn't the forum for this stuff.
Once again Cenk wins out using us all as pawns to spread his hate.
Cut it out, use the forum for your expressed views, it isn't worth it...
Bobby at 6:19PM on Jul 6th 2008
101. Clif I'm pretty familiar with what you can do and can't do with an address.
Whether you are or not remains to be seen.
bob at 5:58PM on Jul 6th 2008
I know a lot of things I can do with an address including crosscheck the name with census and the election board for accuracy and history and elsewhere for outstanding warrants once I get a positive ID. It was unsolicited and we're of diverse citizenship and it may or may not carry more information including intent. You'd be amazed.
if it shows up.
Clif Kuplen at 6:29PM on Jul 6th 2008
102. "I know a lot of things I can do with an address including crosscheck the name with census and the election board for accuracy and history and elsewhere for outstanding warrants once I get a positive ID. It was unsolicited and we're of diverse citizenship and it may or may not carry more information including intent. You'd be amazed."
Actually, I'm not so sure unsolicited would stand up under scrutiny. You did offer the initial challenge for very specific purposes, and I responded accordingly.
But you go ahead and test the waters if you like.
bob at 6:43PM on Jul 6th 2008
103. Clifford, you utilize all that info just from an email address then you talk shit about FISA?
2 funny guy!
Bobby at 6:46PM on Jul 6th 2008
104. Actually, I'm not so sure unsolicited would stand up under scrutiny. You did offer the initial challenge for very specific purposes, and I responded accordingly.
xxxx
No standard met.
You responded ad hominem to my post on oreilly, it was a hostile exchange which you precipitated and in the heat of it you issued a challenge and apparently expected to have a response catered to your address.
You tried to push it on me three times including taunts for not giving you permission, so fine, I let you send it, if you did. Not that I could stop you if you had an email address.
You said you had my email, but you may have made a mistake there. If it's the one I think, not good for you and I won't get dragged into it. You wouldn't be dealing with me in that case. Oh well, we'll find out.
So if it is there and not elsewhere, it's mine now, and you sent it of your own volition after pushing it off on me with taunts three times by your count.
A cock did not crow but there was mention of chickens.
So what were your expectations? That I'd show up some dawn with epees for your honor beneath the elms?
Whatever your expectations you did what you did.
You guys don't do irony or you'd pick up on a theme there.
Clif Kuplen at 7:47PM on Jul 6th 2008
105. "No standard met."
I wouldn't be so sure. You're not the standards guy who gets to make that call.
It's open to interpretation.
My interpretation is this:
I mocked you for suggesting you'd kick Billo's ass - as if you wouldn't be hauled away by security and subjected to a long overdue mental evaluation in the event you ever got near him in the first place.
You, in turn suggested you'd perhaps come to my place instead.
After 3 offers to provide you with the address, you accepted. I used an email attributed to "Clif Kuplen" that anyone might be led to believe is yours - assuming anything about you is not a fabrication.
I emailed the my address to that email address.
You claim not to have gotten it.
If it ended up in someone else's email, I could care less.
They'd just assume someone's "gramps" was gonna come visit them at the address in question.
bob at 7:59PM on Jul 6th 2008