The philosopher Leo Strauss once spoke of the reductio ad Hitlerum. By this he meant the promiscuous tendency of people to try to score a debating point by comparing their opponents to Hitler. The form of the argument is something like this: "My opponent doesn't like strawberry ice cream. Hitler didn't like strawberry ice cream. My opponent is just like Hitler." Strauss's point was that the reductio ad Hitlerum is the mark of the lazy and illogical mind.
Sure enough, here is Richard Dawkins employing the reductio against me in a recent comment on his website richarddawkins.net. Referring to me and a conservative rabbi named Boteach, Dawkins writes: "It occurs to me that people like Boteach and D'Souza may be honestly unaware that they shriek and yell in such an unbecoming way. Maybe this is just what preachers of a certain kind do. So people who profession is to preach, or who live their lives surrounded by preachers, just don't hear their ugly yells and shrieks as we do. They have become so inured to the preaching style of yelling that the resemblance to Hitler passes them by.
"I'm not suggesting that Boteach and D'Souza have literally damaged their ears. But at a higher cortical level they may have become desensitized through years of preaching, and exposure to preachers, so they don't hear, and literally and honestly don't understand, the strong resemblance to the hideous vocal style of Hitler. Once again, I need to emphasize that the comparison with Hitler is limited to vocal style. Of course nobody is suggesting that either Boteach or D'Souza have similar opinions to Hitler, or resemble him in any other way at all.
"But imagine listening to a Boteach speech or a D'Souza speech or a Hitler speech with no knowledge of English or German. I suspect that you'd hardly notice the difference. Contrast it with a speech by Christopher Hitchens. The voice is strong, even a little thrilling. But there's no hysteria there. The words match the content: measured, thoughtful, strong and powerful but never hysterical."
Had this not appeared on Dawkins' website, I would have thought it parody. But who can bring himself to laugh? Does Dawkins have any idea of how gross it is to compare a rabbi to Hitler on the sole ground that both men had a tendency to raise their voices? If this isn't anti-Semitism at the very least it shows a shocking disregard for what the Holocaust means to Jews. Perhaps the kindest explanation is that Dawkins has a pathological hatred for the clergy, and Boteach is a rabbi.
I, on the other hand, am a scholar and author. Dawkins, who knows this, weirdly insinuates that I am a preacher or spend most of my time with preachers. This couldn't be further from the truth. I have been a secular writer for 20 years and mostly I speak to university audiences and business groups. Moreover, the atheists I debate, like Michael Shermer and Peter Singer and Christopher Hitchens, routinely tell me how effectively I use wit and repartee and rhetorical understatement and learned analogies to make my points. Far from using "yells" and "shrieks," the only time I can recall even raising my voice was during my debate with Daniel Dennett, and this was not because I was upset but only because the microphone was not working properly.
I suspect that Dawkins has come up with this pathetic reductio ad Hitlerum in order to justify his cowardice in not debating me. "I can't debate Dinesh because he will use his Hitler voice to shout me down." Isn't the real problem that Dawkins has used his zoologist's credentials in order to wander into fields (physics, astronomy, history, phiosophy, anthropology, theology) where his knowledge is embarrassingly limited? I suspect he's worried that in a debate I will exposure his ignorance and make him an international object of ridicule.
Why not prove me wrong, Richard? Come out from under your desk and take me up on my invitation to debate. I promise to speak in whispers!
And here's some news from our Department of Atheists Who Aren't Wimps: On Friday July 11, I will debate Christopher Hitchens at the big libertarian conference Freedom Fest in Las Vegas. Our topic is "Christianity, Islam and the War on Terror." For more information go to freedomfest.com or simply click here.



Reader Comments ( Page 4 of 29)
46. 3. "I, on the other hand, am a scholar and author"
"And here's some news from our Department of Atheists Who Aren't Wimps: On Friday July 11, I will debate Christopher Hitchens at the big libertarian conference Freedom Fest in Las Vegas"
Ah, yes, debating in Las Vegas. I believe it was Descartes who recommended Las Vegas for all serious scholarly activity?
I think you're right. Who could forget Descartes famous "Ludo ergo Sum" "I gamble therefore I am" I think Las Vegas is a perfect place for a debate featuring Dinesh. Could I place a bet on him looking like a self regarding dickhead in the debate? Stupid question. What bookmaker is going to give me odds on that?
timbo at 11:06AM on Jul 7th 2008
47. "I, on the other hand, am a scholar and author"
Dawkins is an author too, how is this the OTHER hand? Are you REALLY a scholar?
Mokele Mbembe at 11:00AM on Jul 7th 2008
48. "And ne'er the twain shall meet..."
how poetic Robert for a Monday morn...
Shannie at 11:15AM on Jul 7th 2008
49. I think Hitler was probably a better orator.
Ryan Anderson
>>
You pathetic little turd. What's it like to live for no other reason than to be the first to insult DD on every blog entry he makes? Is this all you have to live for? Ryan is like his post ... a complete waste of space.
Thomas J Gassett at 11:22AM on Jul 7th 2008
50. My, my, my dimwit aren't we wonderful
Geoff Barker at 11:26AM on Jul 7th 2008
51.
Just for the record, I was at a DD debate with Michael Shermer, and he not only raised his voice to shouting throughout the debate, he constantly stepped on Shermer's words when Shermer was speaking. And, the only place where you read that his opponents admire him is in DD's blog.
Obviously, Ann Gassett doesn't see the irony of crudely criticizing posters who post here.
Watch out for those little blood clots, Ann. Or that intracranial bleed.
Linda at 11:29AM on Jul 7th 2008
52. I see all the same freaks are awake and living their pathetic godless lives on DD's blog again. Nothing new here. Too bad he can't flush this blog of all these stupid atheist turds. Then we wouldn't have to wade though their shit just to reach the blog subject.
Thomas J Gassett at 11:31AM on Jul 7th 2008
53.
Well Holy Ghost, the maggot excrement called T.J Gassett has risen to life again! Hallelujah!
sparrow at 11:32AM on Jul 7th 2008
54. TJG,
That's 3 references to excrement today already. Are you seriously that witless that you need to invoke feces to make your opinions sound powerful, and dollar store joke book content to sound witty? What are you, 12? Go finish High School, and maybe by then you'll be qualified to be acknowledged.
Mokele Mbembe at 11:35AM on Jul 7th 2008
55. Now let's see
Hitler was an author
Hitler thought he was superior to everyone else
Hitler was a bigot
Hitler thought his way was the only way
Hitler had the support of other brainless bigots
Hitler was an opportunist
Mmmmmmmmmmmmm. No connection
Geoff Barker at 11:37AM on Jul 7th 2008
56. TJG,
That's 3 references to excrement today already. Are you seriously that witless that you need to invoke feces >>>
I call 'em like I see 'em, Turdboy.
I think it would be interesting to explore the long latin word that describes the mental illness shared by the same useless shutins that haunt this blog constantly. Get a real life. You don't need to be shit talkers forever.
Thomas J Gassett at 11:39AM on Jul 7th 2008
57. Definition:
Scholar: a learned person (especially in the humanities); someone who by long study has gained mastery in one or more disciplines.
DD....sorry, but you are not a scholar. Writing a few insipid books and Blogging here does not make you a scholar. You are a lightweight with lightweight opinions. Your intellectual gravitas is zero.
Get over yourself........
John Galt
John Galt at 11:43AM on Jul 7th 2008
58.
Wow! Shelly Gasset is back! Ooo! And he said Turds!
Now everyone, remeber South Park when he says that!
Turdsth! Athesisthh Turdsth!
Nazthi Wimpsth! Faksth! Ahhgghh!!!
(Kyle and Stan run for cover...)
T.Brough at 11:44AM on Jul 7th 2008
59. To TJG's credit, his opinions DO have substance. I'll give you 3 guesses as to what that substance is. Hint: it's his favorite one.
OMG TJS IS TEH LOLZ!
Mokele Mbembe at 11:46AM on Jul 7th 2008
60. Everyone here knows that DD got a hard on just knowing that his name appeared in Dawkins' web-site.
TJ at 11:53AM on Jul 7th 2008