I know that Reverend Sharpton has constituents who expect him to speak out, particularly on issues of fairness. And fairness is at the heart of the Paris Hilton "reassignment" situation. So Sharpton has spoken out:
"...this early release gives all of the appearances of economic and racial favoritism that is constantly cited by poor people and people of color. There are any number of cases of people who handle being incarcerated badly and even have health conditions that are not released.
I have served several sentences for civil rights and civil disobedience actions and I even fasted which caused health concerns to prison authorities who paid for a doctor to come see me daily rather than release me. This act smacks of the double standards that many of us raise."
In substance, fair enough ... even if many of us are a bit tired of the messenger.
But this isn't boilerplate Sharpton. There's a surprising twist here. It comes in the first line of Sharpton's statement:
"Though I have nothing but empathy for Ms. Hilton whom I have met and appeared with on Saturday Night Live the night I hosted in 2003..."
It's a hysterically funny first line. (Did Tom Wolfe help him with it?) But then you have to ask, isn't lily white Paris the symbol of unearned privilege? Of all that Sharpton's constituents legitimately resent? She's the last person you'd expect Sharpton to empathize with at all ... until you realize they're kin. They're both celebrities.
In 1994, O.J. was a case about Race and Celebrity. But in the end it seemed to be more about Race than Celebrity.
In 2007, the Paris case is about Race and Celebrity. But this time, Celebrity trumps Race.
Sign of the times?