Search
About This Blog
Resources
Blog Roll
- Captain's Quarters
- Cliff Schecter
- CNN's Political Ticker
- Conservative Grapevine
- Crooks & Liars
- Daily Kos
- Drudge
- FactCheck.org
- Huffington Post
- Instapundit
- Little Green Footballs
- News Bloggers
- Political-Buzz
- Power Line
- RedState
- Slate - Trailhead
- Swampland
- Talking Points Memo
- The Daily Dish
- The Plank
- The Young Turks
- Wonkette
Mukasey Pressures Congress to Renew FISA
Feb 23rd 2008 10:00AM
Filed Under:eBush Administration, Democrats, Republicans, Terror
Attorney General Michael Mukasey became the latest Bush Administration official to pressure Congress for an extension of the Foreign Intelligence Surveillance Act, or FISA, Friday, saying that Congress's failure to pass the bipartisan extension makes it harder "by the day" to track terrorists. Mukasey made his comments as Congress prepares to return to Washington from its President's Day recess. The issue will be high on the list of priorities in the coming week.The Senate, after much debate, passed an extension of FISA in the first week of February, leaving the House one week before a temporary extension of the law expired. But Democratic leaders in the House refused to allow the Senate bill to come up for a vote before the deadline, causing the law to lapse on February 16th. The Senate bill is supported by a majority of House members on a bipartisan basis, and would surely pass if it were allowed to come to the floor.
The sticking point holding up the legislation is the issue of immunity from lawsuits for telecommunications companies. In the aftermath of the September 11th attacks, the government turned to the major telephone and communications companies and requested their assistance in setting up the controversial terrorist surveillance program. The companies agreed to help the government track phone calls moving through the United States between suspected terrorists and persons both inside and outside the country without warrants under the previous version of FISA. When word of the program was leaked to the press, some felt that the phone companies should be liable for their actions. The Administration insists that the terrorist surveillance program is legal and that the telecommunications companies did nothing wrong in helping the government track potential terrorists. It insists on the immunity provision in any FISA extension to protect those companies from frivolous lawsuits.
The Protect America Act, the temporary extension of FISA that expired last week, contained an immunity provision. The Senate rejected an effort to strip the immunity language from its version of the extension, and the final bill passed with 68 Senators voting in favor. The House version of the extension does not contain immunity. House Republicans, along with a group of over 30 Democrats from more conservative home districts, maneuvered before the recess to prevent the House from taking up another temporary extension of FISA. That left House leaders with a choice, bring the Senate bill up for a vote, or let the law expire.
House and Senate negotiators have been meeting to try and iron out the differences between the two bills even as the two parties trade barbs over the House's failure to pass an extension before the deadline. House Republicans have been charging that majority Democrats have left the country at the mercy of terrorists and other plotters for the sake of scoring political points with trial lawyers, a valued component of the Democratic Party's base. Democrats counter by insisting that the government has all the authority it needs under the previous version of FISA; and that Republicans are only seeking to protect their friends in big business. Meanwhile, the Administration continues to prod Congress to get a final bill passed. The debate will likely take up a good portion of next week, as Congress returns and the Administration turns its attention back to domestic affairs after the president's recent Africa trip.
In the end, it appears likely that an extension of the law will get done, with the immunity provision included. Democrats know that in order to hold on to control of Congress, they must protect those 30 or more seats they hold in traditionally more conservative districts.
Recent Comments
(Page 1 of 1)Jim3:36PMFeb 23rd 2008
Immunity IS warranted because it would encourage communications companies involved to participate (without fear of reprisal from bleeding-heart, left-wing organizations) in the ongoing effort to monitor and intercept questionable communications that would susequently help our government protect us from future terrorist attacks, stateside and abroad.
What is amazing and downright mind-boggling to me, and most other Americans that truly love their country and don't despise their military or their government (as imperfect as the government is), is that the Democrats consistently stand in the way of and undermine our governments power and ability to enact measures to protect this great land and it's citizens from the obvious threat we face to our continued prosperity and strength.
They always want to apologize to other nations for being the greatest nation on earth and are more concerned with manipulating public perception in the interest of gaining political power for themselves.
God bless the U.S.A. and God help us all.
mary beardslee4:54PMFeb 23rd 2008
Congress is considering whether the President has unilateral power to ask companies to break American law.The arguement is manipulative and illogical.Bush&CO is trying to ban Americans from privacy using their usual fear tactics. Bush says give us what we want demos- or we will accuse you of being soft on terror.
PETE8:36PMFeb 23rd 2008
While everyone is entitled to their opinion Mary and Danny have an opinion based on what? Far left talking points proaganda?
Senator Jay Rockerfeller, a liberal Democrat from West Virginia, is chairmen of the Senate Intelligence Committe. Senator Rockerfeller has a secret clearence and unlike Danny and Mary Senator Rockerfeller recieves classified intelligence security briefings.
Senator Barbara Mikulski, another liberal Democrat from Maryland is also on the Senate Intelligence Committe. As a member of the committe Senator Mikulski recieves the same classified information and breifings as Senator Rockerfeller.
One would be hard pressed to find two more liberal Democrats in a position to have the BEST information available on the importance and effectivness of the FISA program.
One would also be hard pressed to find two more liberal Democrats NOT willing to overlook any "trampling of the Constitution" just to
satisfy "Bush and Company."
Immunity for the telecoms will allow the program to remain effective. I trust two liberal Democrats like Senators Rockerfeller and Mikulski have looked at "whether the President has unilateral power to ask companies to break American law."
Democrats would be more than happy to pass the FISA WITHOUT immunity for the telecoms.
In this way Democrats can BS Danny and Mary that they are protecting America while they sick the ACLU on the telecoms and bring the entire FISA program to a halt.
Democrats will give the immpression of protecting America to millions of gullible liberals while they destroy the program from the back door through endless litigation against the telecoms.
Since Danny and Mary do not have secret clearences or recieve intelligence security breifings their opinions are based on BS. I believe Senators Rockerfeller and Mikulski, who both voted to renew the FISA program AND give immunity to the telecoms, are in the best position to make an informed decision and I trust their judgement.
Latest Politics Headlines
Most Commented On Posts
Most Recent Comments
Politics Video
Obama's Iraq dilemmaHas Sen. Barack Obama changed his position on Iraq? CNN's Jessica Yellin reports. (July 3) | |
Michelle ObamaMo Rocca 180 may have found the notorious tape of Michelle Obama saying "whitey." Judge for yourselves. | |
Becoming Michelle ObamaHow easy is it to look like the next First Lady? The men of America want to know and Mo has a drag queen on hand to help them find out. | |
Becoming Michelle ObamaHow easy is it to look like the next First Lady? The men of America want to know and Mo has a drag queen on hand to help them find out. | |
Veteran Voices: '08 Race Through Military EyesIraq war veterans say their military experience has shaped the way they see the upcoming presidential election. Two young veterans, one a John McCain supporter, the other a Barack Obama supporter, share their stories. (July 2) | |
| « See More Politics Video | |
Declare Yourself is a campaign that encourages young Americans to register and vote.
REGISTER TO VOTE NOW AT:www.declareyourself.org
danny1:21PMFeb 23rd 2008
Excuse me, but immunity is not warranted here, a warrant would have alleviated the need for immunity and what is this idea of future immunity?