jpgoodrow7:26PMMay 27th 2008

OBAMA SUPPORTERS SAY HE IS THE "CHANGE" CANDIDATE yet they are still out heckling his opponents. The term "lying hypocrites" quickly comes to mind.

AND OBAMA IS SUCH A LIAR. Yesterday he claimed his grandfather helped liberate Auschwitz... which in truth was liberated by Russia.

So today he said tried to say he meants his American uncle liberated Buchwald... but his mother is an only child. lol

So a few hours later it was his GREAT-UNCLE who helped liberate a SUB-camp at Buchwald. By the time we get the truth it will be that his nanny put out a fire at his lemonade stand at the bottom of his driveway. LOLOL

Can you say lying "sniper fire hypocrite" Obama Sweetie???

CLINTON or MCCAIN '08
America Needs A President, Not A Fingerpointing Hypocrite

D. L. GRAHAM7:29PMMay 27th 2008

YO! BRO DITCH THE DEMS!!

Yo! Bro Ditch the Dems, and break the self applied rusty chains of self slavery to the Democratic Party.
It is time to really seek the fresh air of "FREEDOM" and "INDEPENDENT VOTER STATUS".

Look, Bro, you have writters like Tommy Christopher and his surrogate self Mr. Sandy Clark, who are totally blind to the "Code Word's" and "Code Phrases" that the Clinton Campaign has been using all along in their "Right To The White House".

The Old Civil Rights Leaders, no longer have the power that they had once in the Democratic Party, individuals such as (D-SC) US/Rep. Jim Clyburn no longer have the "Eye of The Tiger", but have become more the "House Cat" of the Democratic Party.

How many times is the "Racist" Democratic Super-Delegates going to change the game, move the goal post, in their efforts to get this moved into the Democratic Convention where they will overturn the nomination of (D-IL) US/Senator Barrack "Barry" Hussein Obama? Do you really believe that this Saturday 31st of May they don't intend to once again "Kick The Can" down the street?

YO! BRO! Don't you think that the number will once again change from (2025) to (2210) and even higher if necessary? What about "You don't talk to a man about rope in his home, who has survived a hanging" (Source" FDR)? Isn't that the same as the Clinton Assassination comment?

YO! BRO! It's time to seek the "FREEDOM OF BEING INDEPENDENT", we are (35%) of the vote in this country, and we don't nearly need either party as much as they need us.

YO! BRO! The pigment of your skin don't matter, what matters is your "FREEDOM OF TAUGHT", and your own determination to make it on your own terms, there is no fixed game out here, no moving the goal posts, no kicking the can, no changing the rules, no "Code Words", No "Code Phrases", No being a "Judas" if you don't fall in line.

YO! BRO! your not leaving a party, your leaving party slavery. It's not The Black Guy Can't Get Elected, it's there is "NO REASON" the Black Guy by proving himself can be stopped from his prize!

YO! BRO! Your much better than the Democratic Party deserves, let the Clinton's, Tommy Christiophers and Mr. Sandy Clarks keep it, your better the lot.

YO! BRO! Follow the (35%+) rest of us!

Kim7:57PMMay 27th 2008

An Army or Marine Corps sergeant with four years of experience makes $27,000 a year, plus combat pay of $225 a month, according to the 2008 Military Authorization Act, which increased basic pay rates 3.5 percent from a year ago.

Soldiers authorized to live off-base also receive a housing allowance that this year starts at about $500 a month, 7.3 percent higher than in 2007, paid even when they are deployed. Counting the stipends, they still fall short of the 2007 median U.S. household income of $59,224 as measured by the National Association of Realtors in Chicago.

Congress needs to pass the Bill for Increase and forget mccain's hostage bill base on retention

DON WALKER9:20PMMay 27th 2008

BUSH AND MCCAIN ARE BIG CROOKS JUST LOOK AT THE HI GAS IT IS BUSH IDEA BOTH OF THEM ARE JUST LIKE HILLARY AND BILL ARE THE BIGEST CROOKS ALL 4 OF THEM NEEDS TO BE LOCK UP FOR A LONG LONG TIME

Leslie9:26PMMay 27th 2008

jpgoodrow,

even if the story is not about Obama, you make it about him. I think you have a crush on Obama....maybe you should be the new Obama Girl!

Rkymtnmary9:41PMMay 27th 2008

So now we have another lie from Obama re an uncle this time?

Sickening.

Democrat for McCain.

Charles Fowler9:41PMMay 27th 2008

I'm going to vote for Sen Obama so I'm not afraid of what Sen McCain has to say. There are only 2 reasons for these protestors. They just want to get on TV or they are afraid of what Sen McCain has to say. This is a country of free speech. Let both sides say what they have to say and then let everybody decide which one they support. When they execise what they call free speech in this manner they are depriving other people of there right to free speech.

VINCE9:42PMMay 27th 2008

Scenes like these clowns protesting at a speech by Sen. McCain are just going to elicit sympathy for him, and will move middle-of-the-road voters in his direction. Left-wing neophytes, such as these protesters have killed the Democratic Party's chances in far too many elections, and the extreme left is out to do it again...the MOVE ON.org crowd does not represent regular working class Americans, and antics such as these are not going to be looked upon kindly by these critical voters. Soros and his ilk had better rein these brats in before they, just like the Hippies and the No Nukes groups before them, cost the Democratic Nominee this year's election.

Jeffrey Monheit10:34PMMay 27th 2008

The best U.S. Presidential candidates in this election got censored due to Zionist infrastructure. Please read "The Protocols of the Learned Elders of Zion". These are genuine despite government cover ups.
Please visit the following web sites for urgent matters related to our freedom: www.antiwar.com, www.stoprealidnow.blogspot.com, http://action.aclu.org/pizza_action, www.palestineconference.com, www.nkusa.com, www.ronpaul2008.com, www.nowarforisrael.com, www.exposingisraeliapartheid.com, www.youtube.com/user/Elinitsam (see Video Logs).
If you care about your economic and social freedom, please write in my candidate for U.S. President in November: Ron Paul, web site: www.ronpaul2008.com. He will expose the institutions who are controlling power and ruining the world for all of us.
As long as we have candidates like John McCain in power, we will surely be faced with the Mark of the Beast (A.K.A. Verichip). Police, military are already using it throughout North America. Read what this is about in the Book Of Revelation. Also resist the Real I.D. Act/National I.D. Card! Most importantly, please pass this information onto your friends and throughout the Internet. Together we are strong!

simariah1:08AMMay 28th 2008

A long time ago war was fought a lot of great lives were lost and a paper was drafted that said All Men are created equal, that they are endowed by their creator with certain unalienable rights, that among theses are Life, Liberty, and the Pursuit of Happiness. No one has rights superior to those of anyone else. We are born with these rights, we do not get them from the government whatever powers the governments has comes from us.
It seems we have lost our way and it just seems to get worse and worse. It has been a long time since I have heard people talk about this piece of paper let alone a politician. I say that I would vote for a politician that believes in that piece of paper the politician who does not fight back and forth amongst themselves worse than bully's on a playground. I would vote for the politician who is fighting for that piece of paper that protects my liberties. I would not care what color or faith or planet that politician was from. I just happened to find that man and he is fighting for that paper, our Constitution of the United States of America. That is the politician that will get my vote and my Thanks. Thank You Ron Paul.

Enonesoch1:31AMMay 28th 2008

There is something called Freedom of Speech. Obviously these people pulling down the signs have never experienced non-violent political dissent. Who the hell do they think they are touching those people's property like that. The point of Freedom of Speech is not, 'you can say what you want as long as I agree with it'. These people make me sick. I mean damn, John McCain makes me sick and even he recognized that these people have a right to speak their mind. These people will face concequences for their peaceful demonstration of dissent, they know this before they do it, it is their choice, their right to do so. What the hell is going on in this country? When fellow Americans are shunned for speaking their mind, we have truly lost our way. I need to dry the tears from my eyes before I go throw up

Enonesoch1:35AMMay 28th 2008

Also, I would love to know how many people in that audience have children in Iraq. And for those that do, you are missing an important part of your relationship with them...it's called love.

Dee7:16AMMay 28th 2008

Obama's 'Not Exactly's':
>
> 1.) Selma Got Me Born - NOT EXACTLY, your parents felt safe enough to have
> you in 1961 - Selma had no effect on your birth, as Selma was in 1965. (Google
> 'Obama Selma' for his full March 4, 2007 speech and articles about its
> various untruths).
> 2.) Father Was A Goat Herder - NOT EXACTLY, he was a privileged, well-
> educated youth, who went on to work with the Kenyan Government.
> 3.) Father Was A Proud Freedom Fighter - NOT EXACTLY, he was part of one of
> the most corrupt and violent governments Kenya has ever had.
> 4.) My Family Has Strong Ties To African Freedom - NOT EXACTLY, your cousin
> Raila Odinga, has created mass violence in attempting to overturn a legitimate
> election in 2007, in Kenya. It is the first widespread violence in decades.
> The current government is pro-American but Odinga wants to overthrow it and
> establish Muslim Sharia law. Your half-brother, Abongo Obama, is Odinga's
> follower. You interrupted your New Hampshire campaigning to speak to Odinga on
> the phone. Check out the following link for verification of that..and for
> more. Obama's cousin Odinga in Kenya ran for president and tried to get Sharia
> muslim law in place there. When Odinga lost the elections, his followers have
> burned Christians' homes and then burned men, women and children alive in a
> Christian church where they took shelter. Obama SUPPORTED his cousin before
> the election process here started. Google Obama and Odinga and see what you
> get. No one wants to know the truth.
> 5.) My Grandmother Has Always Been A Christian - NOT EXACTLY, she does her
> daily Salat prayers at 5:00 a.m. according to her own interviews. Not to mention,
> the fact that Christianity wouldn't allow her to have been one of 14 wives to 1 man.
> 6.) My Name is African Swahili - NOT EXACTLY, your name is Arabic and
> 'Baraka' (from which Barack came) means 'blessed' in that language. Hussein is also Arabic and so Obama Barack Hussein Obama is not half black. If elected,
> he would be the first Arab-American President, not the first black President.
> Barack Hussein Obama is 50% Caucasian from his mother's side and 43.75%
> Arabic and 6.25% African Negro from his father's side. While Barack Hussein
> Obama's father was from Kenya, his father's family was mainly Arab. Barack
> Hussein Obama's father was only 12.5% African Negro and 87.5% Arab (his father's
> birth certificate even states he's Arab, not African Negro). For more, go to:
>
> _http://www.arcadeathome.com/newsboy.phtml?Barack_Hussein_Obama_-_Arab-American,_only_6.25%25_African_
> (http://www.arcadeathome.com/newsboy.phtml?Barack_Hussein_Obama_-_Arab-American,_only_6.25%_African)
>
> 7.) I Never Practiced Islam - NOT EXACTLY, you practiced it daily at school,
> where you were registered as a Muslim and kept that faith for 31 years,
> until your wife made you change, so you could run for office. 4-3-08 Article:
> 'Obama was 'quite religious in islam.
> _http://www.wnd.com/index.php?fa=PAGE.view&pageId=60559_ (http://www.wnd.com/index.php?fa=PAGE.view&pageId=60559)
>
8.) My School In Indonesia Was Christian - NOT EXACTLY, you were registered
> as Muslim there and got in trouble in Koranic Studies for making faces
> (check your own book). February 28, 2008. & Kristoff from the New York Times a
> year ago: Mr. Obama recalled the opening lines of the Arabic call to prayer,
> reciting them with a first-rate accent. In a remark that seemed delightfully
> uncalculated (it'll give Alabama voters heart attacks) Mr. Obama described the
> call to prayer as 'one of the prettiest sounds on Earth at sunset.' This is
> just one example of what Pamela is talking about when she says 'Obama's
> narrative is being altered, enhanced and manipulated to whitewash troubling
> facts.'
> 9.) I Was Fluent In Indonesian - NOT EXACTLY, not one teacher says you
> could speak the language.
> 10.) Because I lived In Indonesia, I Have More Foreign Experience - NOT EXACTLY,
> you were there from the ages of 6 to 10 and couldn't even speak the language.
> What you did learn was how to study the Koran and watch cartoons.
> 11.) I Am Stronger On Foreign Affairs - NOT EXACTLY, except for Africa
> (surprise) and the Middle East (bigger surprise), you have never been anywhere
> else on the planet and thus have NO experience with our closest allies.
> 12.) I Blame My Early Drug Use On Ethnic Confusion - NOT EXACTLY, you were
> quite content in high school to be Barry Obama, no mention of Kenya and no
> mention of struggle to identify - your classmates said you were just fine.
> 13.) An Ebony Article Moved Me To Run For Office - NOT EXACTLY, Ebony has yet
> to find the article you mention in your book. It doesn't, and never did,
> exist.
> 14.) A Life Magazine Article Changed My Outlook On Life - NOT EXACTLY, Life
> has yet to find the article you mention in your book. It doesn't and never
> did, exist.
> 15.) I Won't Run On A National Ticket In '08 - NOT EXACTLY, here you are,
> despite saying, live on TV, that you would not have enough experience by
> then, and you are all about having experience first.
> 16.) Voting 'Present' is Common In Illinois Senate - NOT EXACTLY, they are
> common for YOU, but not many others have 130 NO VOTES.
> 17.) Oops, I Misvoted - NOT EXACTLY, only when caught by church groups and
> Democrats, did you beg to change your misvote.
> 18.) I Was A Professor Of Law - NOT EXACTLY, you were a senior lecturer ON
> LEAVE.
> 19.) I Was A Constitutional Lawyer - NOT EXACTLY, you were a senior lecturer
> ON LEAVE.
> 20.) Without Me, There Would Be No Ethics Bill - NOT EXACTLY, you didn't
> write it, introduce it, change it, or create it.
> 21.) The Ethics Bill Was Hard To Pass - NOT EXACTLY, it took just 14 days
> from start to finish.
> 22.) I Wrote A Tough Nuclear Bill - NOT EXACTLY, your bill was rejected by
> your own party for its pandering and lack of all regulation - mainly because
> of your Nuclear donor, Exelon, from which David Axelrod came.
> 23.) I Have Released My State Records - NOT EXACTLY, as of March, 2008,
> state bills you sponsored or voted for have yet to be released, exposing all the
> special interests (pork) hidden within.
> 24.) I Took On The Asbestos Altgeld Gardens Mess - NOT EXACTLY, you were
> part of a large group of people who remedied Altgeld Gardens. You failed to
> mention anyone else but yourself, in your books.
> 25.) My Economics Bill Will Help America - NOT EXACTLY, your 111 economic
> policies were just combined into a proposal which lost 99-0 and even YOU voted
> against your own bill.
> 26.) I Have Been A Bold Leader In Illinois - NOT EXACTLY, even your own
> supporters claim to have not seen BOLD action on your part.
> 27.) I Passed 26 Of My Own Bills In One Year - NOT EXACTLY, they were not
> YOUR bills, but rather handed to you, after their creation by a fellow
> Senator, to assist you in a future bid for higher office.
> 28.) No One on my campaign contacted Canada about NAFTA - NOT EXACTLY, the
> Canadian Government issued the names and a memo of the conversation your
> campaign had with them.
> 29.) I Am Tough On Terrorism - NOT EXACTLY, you missed the Iran Resolution
> vote on terrorism and your good friend Ali Abunimah supports the destruction
> off Israel.
> 30.) I Want All Votes To Count - NOT EXACTLY, you said: "let the delegates
> decide."
> 31.) I Want Americans To Decide - NOT EXACTLY, you prefer caucuses that
> limit the vote, confuse the voters, force a public vote and only operate during
> small windows of time.
> 32.) I passed 900 Bills in the State Senate - NOT EXACTLY, you passed 26,
> most of which you didn't write yourself.
> 33.) I Believe In Fairness, Not Tactics - NOT EXACTLY, you used tactics to
> eliminate Alice Palmer from running against you.
> 34.) I Don't Take PAC! Money - NOT EXACTLY, you take loads of it.
> 35.) I don't Have Lobbyists - NOT EXACTLY, you have over 47 lobbyists, and
> counting.
> 36.) My Campaign Had Nothing To Do With The 1984 Ad - NOT EXACTLY, your own
> campaign worker made the ad on his Apple in one afternoon.
> 37.) I Have Always Been Against Iraq - NOT EXACTLY, you weren't in office to
> vote against it AND you have voted to fund it every single time.
>38.) I Have Always Supported Universal Health Care - NOT EXACTLY, your plan
> leaves us all to pay for the 15,000,000 who don't have to buy it.
>
> 'Qui non intelligit aut discat aut taceat' Who does not understand
> should either learn, or be silent...

Debra Johnson7:42AMMay 28th 2008

I hope the protestors drive the REPUKES right off of the planet!

ed.slough1:02AMJun 1st 2008

OPEN LETTER TO SENATOR BARAK OBAMA:

Dear Senator Obama!

You and the members of your campaign deserve congratulations. You have out-maneuvered the Clinton campaign. You have raised record amounts of campaign contributions. You have a majority of the delegates selected in the primaries --- especially in caucus states. Your campaign has turned-out such huge crowds at your campaign events that you have been compared to a rock star. Even though you have failed to win enough selected delegates to cinch the nomination, you have managed to line-up the Democratic Party leadership behind your candidacy with the argument that you have won more selected delegates than Clinton. Congratulations are in order.

But what I want to know, Senator Obama, is what are you going to do now? I have read and seen incredibly ugly blogs filled with "hate-talk" against both you and Senator Clinton. While I do commend you for your statements of admiration for Senator Clinton, both campaigns have remained relatively silent on the gutter-level attacks by your supporters against your opponent. You have said that you have a new vision for change in America, one which is inclusive. Well, how are you going to change the incredible animosity between the large numbers of Obama supporters and Clinton supporters? How are you going to re-unite the Democratic Party? All I have heard is that you are confident you will not lose New York or California (which is probably true), two states "won" by Senator Clinton.

The general election will require a completely different set of skills, and a different level of political mastery. Given the consequences of your own religious affiliations, how can you possibly convince rural and suburban blue collar voters that you understand that their religious beliefs are interwoven into the fabric of their community, social and personal lives? How can you convince individuals for whom owning a gun and hunting is a family tradition dating back to the days of the settlers that they will not be disenfranchised by an Obama Administration? Do you think your eloquent oratory and huge crowds will win them over?

By referencing the strong Democratic vote in New York and California, it appears that you intend to rely on McCain the Republican to gain the grudging support --- and vote --- of Clinton's supporters. If that is your strategy, I must tell you, Senator Obama, that I think you are dead wrong. Despite the high stakes of this election, voters who are really turned-off will stay home and not vote. A large chunk of Clinton's supporters will, if things remain as they are today, feel completely disenfranchised by your nomination as the Democratic Party candidate. They do not feel that you are capable of adequately representing their interests.

I hope you are giving these questions and issues your very serious consideration, Senator Obama. I am waiting for you to convince me that I should vote for you.

Warmest Regards!

Edward A. Slough
Ft. Lauderdale, Florida

jj10:17AMJun 1st 2008

John McCain nor any other Bush Hug-up will ever get my vote. Their business as usual has degraded our country..I don't want another minute of the status quo'..4 more years of it would surely show us the abyss!

edslough6:53PMJun 3rd 2008

HILLARY CLINTON CAN DEFEAT McCAIN IN FLORIDA, OHIO, MICHIGAN, PENNSYLVANIA, WEST VIRGINIA AND WIN ELECTION! OBAMA CANNOT!

McCain's promise to continue waging war in Iraq until we "win" is certainly called into question by these revelations by former White House Press Secretary Scott McClellan. The Bush administration actively deceived the American people, Congress, the U.N., and
individuals within Bush's admin.such as Colin Powell. To continue squandering the scarce financial resources of the U.S. in order to "save face" is utter stupidity.

The Iraq War has driven the U.S. into a recession which Warren Buffet says will be very long and deep. Our grandchildren will be taxed to pay-off the huge federal deficit created by Bush with his war. And the people of Iraq received better treatment than
Americans caught in Hurricane Katrina. The U.S. was dropping "meals ready to eat" and bottled water to the people of Iraq at the same time Katrina victims were left starving, and dying from dehydration, in New Orleans.

Bush should be impeached for his wreckless disregard for the well-being of the American people!!!

EASLOUGH7:54PMJun 3rd 2008

At the beginning of this primary election campaign, no one anticipated that caucuses with the participation of a very small number of voters (i.e., many in solidly "red" states) could become so
important to the outcome of the primaries. Part of the reasoning behind having the candidates agree not to campaign in FL or MI was to "force" then to change their primary dates. However, that didn't happen. In caucus states, groups of several hundred
voters were "out-shouted" by enthusiastic Obama campaign workers, and are being used to "represent" hundreds of thousands of votes.

The polls show Obama losing to McCain in FL, WV, and OH. Clinton is ahead of McCain in polls in those three crucial "swing" states. Obama may be competitive in PA, but Clinton's lead over McCain in polls there is much stronger. And Clinton is competitive in KY and AR. Obama has a real problem with a significant part of the traditional Democratic Party base --- women, seniors, blue collar workers and Jews. CLINTON 08!!!

e.a.slough10:13PMJun 3rd 2008

CLINTON SHOULD TAKE NOMINATION BATTLE TO CONVENTION!!!

Barack Obama does not yet have the nomination. The Democratic super-delegates were created to react to the "electability" of the nominee who has amassed the most delegates from Democratic primaries, but who has not won a sufficient number of delegates to take the nomination. Think George McGovern, who won only one electoral vote in the general election. While Obama has certainly mastered the process by which
"committed" delegates are selected, he is far behind Clinton in electoral votes. Pollsters have concluded that Obama IS NOT COMPETITIVE with McCain in Florida, Ohio and West Virginia. Can he lose all three of these states and still carry the general election? The electoral vote math is what should be analyzed before "super" delegates annoint a winner.

I do not think that Obama has "weathered" the controversy over the Rev. Wright. It momentarily subsided as a decisive issue in public opinion polls. But we have all seen the polls turn on a dime. We just now are assessing the remarks by yet another Reverend at Obama's church: Rev. Pfleger. The emergence of the Rev. Wright on THREE publicly televised appearances repeating the offensive remarks which dominated the 30 second videos on TV have raised serious doubts about Obama's veracity and judgement. This is a man who was very influential over Obama for 20 years. Does it make any sense that the radical views of a man such as Wright, who had the "audacity" to re-televise and renew his controversial remarks, could remain "hidden and unknown" to Obama for 20 years? Come on ... We all know that Obama is extremely intelligent. Clinton was right to challenge his explanations: "While it is true that we cannot choose our relatives, we can and do choose our spiritual advisors." Of course, Hillary was slammed by the media for her accurate remarks. At this point, the American people will undoubtedly have many questions in their minds about Obama's church, and his judgements.

And Obama's remarks about blue collar workers clinging to "guns and religion" ensured decisive victories for Hillary Clinton in West Virginia and Kentucky. Can the Democrats prevail without the traditional blue collar support? This voting block will determine the victor is in the "swing" states which are necessary for a Democratic victory. If Hillary ceased her primary campaign tomorrow, would those alienated blue collar voters turn out in record numbers for Obama? Or would they just stay at home rather than vote, or wait to vote for McCain in the general election? Hillary can certainly not be held responsible for Obama's regrettable remarks. The media picked-up on the comments, repeated them over and over, and then seemed surprised when voters' opinions are affected by those comments. As a well-seasoned politician, of course Hillary identified blue collar alienation and worked to win their support. But it was Obama's remarks, and the media's reporting practices, which created the alienation in the first place.

Why would voters vote for McCain over Obama despite their huge differences in policies regarding the Iraq War, health care and the economy? Because McCain is a genuine American hero ... because McCain is known to be a person who frequently refused to follow the Republican party line and often reached across party lines and who has pledged to appoint Democrats to his administration ... and because it is unlikely that McCain will have the muscle to get objectionable legislation through a likely Democratically-controlled Congress. And, most importantly, Clinton and McCain are well-known entities whose values, ideals, political histories, and short-comings have been a part of the political landscape with which Americans are familiar, and Obama is not.

Why should Hillary discontinue her historic campaign? Her campaign (as Obama's) is registering record numbers of new voters. She's winning in the "swing" states --- OH, PA, WV, FL --- where the outcome of the election will be determined. She has the strongest appeal to voters who also find things to like about McCain, but who are alientated from Obama.