DNA Clears Ramsey Family of Murder

ibrenchn 09:49:27 PM Jul 14 2008

ITS ABOUT TIME ........DNA HAS BEEN AROUND HOW LONG????? TOO BAD MRS RAMSEY DIED BEFORE THEY DECLAIRED THIS AND FER FKN SAKES I BLEVE THE AUTHORITIES NEED TO REDEEM THEMSELVES.......R.I.P JONBENET

eleuschn 02:35:41 AM Jul 12 2008

Bravo, Jargonuse! I really hope some of these morons can comprehend what you're saying...it's sad but true that people like the idiots on this board are like sheep and will believe a tabloid before the truth..

jargonuse 02:12:06 AM Jul 12 2008

8) was something about the $118,000 in the ransom note and that it was equal to his work bonus. The bonus was from the prior year and was paid in February 1996 - 10 months before the murder. Why would a parent writing a staged ransom note think back to a bonus payment from 10 months prior and use that amount in the note? It makes no sense and would tend to incriminate themselves in the investigation. Their is more meaning to that ransom number. Of course if you look hard and long enough, you can find that bonus payment amount, or a check written at work , or something else that matches closely to that number in the ransom. The bonus was not exactly $118,000 - but close enough. Look at how they tried to match some meaning to the acronym in the note. Eventually you can find something that is close enough. Reminds me of the similarities between the Lincoln and Kennedy assassinations (both were succeeded by Johnson as the next president, etc. etc.)

jargonuse 02:02:46 AM Jul 12 2008

7. If the evildoers motive was to KILL JonBenet, why go to the time and trouble of writing and leaving a ransom note? If their motive was to KIDNAP her, why leave her body there? Wouldn't you take her body with you in an attempt to hopefully still get some money out of the family? Other than the fact that you copied all of your thoughts on this from a website - the answer will not be known to anyone but the killer. Theories are that the intent was to do a kidnapping, but the plan went awry for some reason. After that, it is all speculation of what went wrong.

jargonuse 02:00:17 AM Jul 12 2008

6. The fake ransom note was written on paper from inside the house. So the killer/kidnapper broke in to the house, looked around for pen and paper and then spent several minutes writing the note while inside the house? No way. (R) Yes - you finally got it right. No one was home when the note was written. The killer was lying in wait. No way to prove that, but it is a plausible explanation. Certainly much more plausible than believing the family could have murdered their daughter then calmly writing it as part of an elaborate and unplanned staging of a kidnap/murder. Are you completely insane to think that could have happened? Sorry - you are entitled to an opinion. It just doesn't make sense to virtually anyone keeping an open mind.

jargonuse 01:59:05 AM Jul 12 2008

(cont'd) Instead, she went down to make coffee at 5:30 am and found the ramsom note. She later threw on clothes that were available after changing out of her pajamas when police started arriving. 5. That fake ransom note. EVERYONE acknowledges that it was a phony. No professional kidnapper writes for three pages. (R) First thing - there is no such thing as a professional kidnapper - and EVERYONE has not acknowledged that it was a fake - just those who want that to be the conclusion. This is too lengthy to even debate the intracacies of that note. The lines in the note were taken from various movies - including the movie Ransom which had just been released in Boulder. The Ramsey's had not seen the movie. There is much more to this - but suffice it to say - you are just plain wrong on this point.

jargonuse 01:47:01 AM Jul 12 2008

.3. They refused to talk to the cops for four months afterwards. Again, you would think they would want to help find who killed their daughter - ANOTHER falsehood. They were interrogated for several days following the murder. They provided the terms of all future interviews they would conduct to the police when they were made the prime suspects. The police refused to interview them under those terms. There was nothing left to provide to police. 4. Patsy Ramsey was wearing the same designer clothes on Christmas day as she did to a Christmas Eve party the night before. Ms. former beauty queen, concerened about her appearance is going to wake up, do her hair and makeup and put on the same clothes from the night before? No way. She was up all night arranging the crime scene (R) First of all you have the days wrong. She had the same clothes on the morning after Christmas that she wore the evening before to a friend's Christmas Day gathering. She did not wake up and do her hair -

jargonuse 01:37:14 AM Jul 12 2008

Other stupid comments from JoeTigers 1. No one in the house heard anything? No scream. Nothing. Strange. Why is that so strange? They did the tests in the house and proved noises in the basement could be heard outside but not on the 3rd floor where the Ramsey's slept. 2. They move to Atlanta mere hours after the murder was committed. That;s completely false. They went to Atlanta to bury their daughter and returned to Boulder for after the funeral. Get your facts straight !!! Don't they want to stick around and aid in the investigation? I guess not. They were heavily interrogated in the case and provided DNA samples.

jargonuse 01:15:30 AM Jul 12 2008

Cont'd "Poor hygiene can cause chronic inflammation," Dr. Joan Slook, a pediatrician with the Baylor College of Medicine in Houston, told the Daily Camera. "Some little girls can have asymptomatic bladder infections that can cause irritation in the vagina." That is exactly what she was being treated for. The police never got that information from the doctor. Police could not have obtained those things on their own, because they don't have subpoena power," said a source. "All that was completely voluntary on the part of the family."

jargonuse 01:10:35 AM Jul 12 2008

For the moron - Y2n that posted his evidence after I challenged him to provide it. As to the evidence of prior sexual abuse. There is nothing in the autopsy report indicating prior sexual abuse. And then there's Cyril Wecht, the biggest phony pathologist of all time:While a coroner's report found JonBenet had been sexually assaulted before she was killed, experts have differed widely as to whether the evidence supports previous or chronic abuse. The coroner's report found "chronic inflammation and epithelial erosion" in the girl's vagina, leading Dr. Cyril Wecht, coroner of Allegheny County, Pa., to conclude that there was abuse at least two days before her death. But others say anyone who hasn't examined the actual tissue couldn't reach a reliable conclusion. "Poor hygiene can cause chronic inflammation," Dr. Joan Slook, a pediatrician with the Baylor College of Medicine in Houston, told the Daily Camera. "Some little girls can have asymptomatic bladder infections that can cause