Find, view and share videos about news and entertainment from around the Web.
See Videos »

Blog Chatter

NEWS ALERTS

Get the latest updates sent straight to your inbox.

Sign up to receive AOL News alerts by e-mail.

House OKs Bill Protecting Gay Workers

By ANDREW MIGA,
AP
Posted: 2007-11-08 09:55:01

WASHINGTON (Nov. 7) -- The House on Wednesday approved the first federal ban on job discrimination against gays, lesbians and bisexuals.

Passage of the Employment Non-Discrimination Act came despite protests from some gay rights supporters that the bill does not protect transgender workers. That term covers transsexuals, cross-dressers and others whose outward appearance does not match their gender at birth.

The measure would make it illegal for employers to make decisions about hiring, firing, promoting or paying an employee based on sexual orientation. It would exempt churches and the military.

After the 235-184 vote, supporters are expecting a tough fight in the narrowly divided Senate, where Massachusetts Democrat Edward Kennedy plans to introduce a similar version.

A veto from President Bush is expected if the proposal does pass the Senate. The White House has cited constitutional concerns and said the proposal could trample religious rights.

Backers of the House bill proclaimed it a major civil rights advance for gays. "Bigotry and homophobia are sentiments that should never be allowed to permeate the American workplace," said House Majority Whip James Clyburn, D-S.C.

The decision by Democratic leaders to exclude protections based on gender identity created sharp divisions in the party and among gay rights activists.

Republicans, meanwhile, said the bill could undermine the rights of people who oppose homosexuality for religious reasons and lead to an onslaught of dubious discrimination lawsuits.

"This is, frankly, a trial lawyer's dream," said Rep. John Kline, R-Minn.

Protections for transgender workers were in the original bill. But Democratic leaders found they would lose support from moderate and conservative Democrats by including transgender employees in the final bill.

"That's a bridge too far," said Rep. Rick Boucher, D-Va. "It's better to take it one step at a time."

Rep. Jerrold Nadler, however, said excluding transgender workers was shortsighted.

"As we have seen in many states, the failure to include the transgender community in civil rights legislation from the beginning makes it more difficult to extend protections later," said Nadler, D-N.Y.

Rep. Barney Frank, one of two openly gay members of Congress and an important supporter of the bill, urged colleagues not to let the dispute over transgender workers doom an important gain in civil rights.

Frank, D-Mass., said he hoped the bill would send a message to "millions of Americans who are gay and lesbian that they are not bad people, that it is not legitimate to fire them simply because of who they are."

He also pledged to continue to fight for a bill to protect transgender workers.

Job discrimination based on factors such as race, gender and religion are banned under federal law. Nineteen states and the District of Columbia have laws against sexual-orientation discrimination.

Only nine states specifically protect transgender people from discrimination: New Jersey, Minnesota, Rhode Island, New Mexico, California, Illinois, Maine, Hawaii, Washington. The District of Columbia has a similar law.

By January, laws also will be in effect in Iowa, Vermont, Colorado and Oregon.

Copyright 2008 The Associated Press. The information contained in the AP news report may not be published, broadcast, rewritten or otherwise distributed without the prior written authority of The Associated Press. All active hyperlinks have been inserted by AOL.
2007-11-08 09:33:59
Bookmark

Recent Comments

1 - 10 of 3429
3429 comments

Mysticsmb 01:44:00 PM Nov 12 2007

donedaytona 05:46:10 PM Nov 11 2007
If a Spanish-American,gay,woman performs poorly on the job, she has nothing to worry about. If an English-American, heterosexual, man performs poorly on the job, he will be fired.

ANYONE who performs poorly on a job can be fired. What you can't do is give someone fabulous performance reviews and then when you find out they're gay, fire them and claim it was due to "poor job performance." That's exactly what used to happen to women too, before there were sexual harassment laws.

rdariusxxx 06:12:55 PM Nov 11 2007

<<<donedaytona 05:46:10 PM Nov 11 2007

Report This! If a person does not perform their job as requested, the employer should have the right to fire that person. I do not understand why we need the government to pass laws protecting people of color, women, and gays. If a Spanish-American,gay,woman performs poorly on the job, she has nothing to worry about. If an English-American, heterosexual, man performs poorly on the job, he will be fired. Our liberal leaning society seems to be totally void of common sense.>>>

It appears that you haven't read the bill. It deals only with the hiring or firing of a person for the SOLE reason that that person is gay. You will not be able to not hire, nor fire, a person simply because that person is gay. Why is that a problem?

If the person is performing poorly and it is properly documented, then there is nothing for businesses or individuals to worry about.

Religion is a specifically protected class of people for who discrimination is banned. You

rdariusxxx 06:06:13 PM Nov 11 2007

<<<donedaytona 05:46:10 PM Nov 11 2007

Report This! If a person does not perform their job as requested, the employer should have the right to fire that person. I do not understand why we need the government to pass laws protecting people of color, women, and gays. If a Spanish-American,gay,woman performs poorly on the job, she has nothing to worry about. If an English-American, heterosexual, man performs poorly on the job, he will be fired. Our liberal leaning society seems to be totally void of common sense.>>>

Seems to me that you are not reading the bill. It deals only with the hiring or firing of an employee for the SOLE reason that that person is gay. If an employee is performing poorly and it is properly documented, no business or person need worry about frivolous lawsuits.

BTW, if gays don't need such specific protection, then neither does religion. But religion IS specifically protected against discrimination by law.

It appears to me that the far right doesn't want gays

donedaytona 05:46:00 PM Nov 11 2007

If a person does not perform their job as requested, the employer should have the right to fire that person. I do not understand why we need the government to pass laws protecting people of color, women, and gays. If a Spanish-American,gay,woman performs poorly on the job, she has nothing to worry about. If an English-American, heterosexual, man performs poorly on the job, he will be fired. Our liberal leaning society seems to be totally void of common sense.

Queenofsafety 01:45:07 PM Nov 11 2007

Thank you to all of our soldiers and veterans who risk/risked their lives for our freedoms. May we use our freedoms wisely and make those who have sacrificed proud. With freedom comes responsibility and sacrifice.

Respect, Appreciation, Gratefulness.

Queenofsafety 01:45:06 PM Nov 11 2007

Thank you to all of our soldiers and veterans who risk/risked their lives for our freedoms. May we use our freedoms wisely and make those who have sacrificed proud. With freedom comes responsibility and sacrifice.

Respect, Appreciation, Gratefulness.

garre9j 08:52:00 AM Nov 11 2007

This is just another bill that the brain dead house puts forth and the Senate will shoot down- pull-.

carolsmutts 05:15:43 AM Nov 11 2007

How does anyone reply to such ignorance and fear. Yes, this law is necessary. Just read the above comments to prove the point.

Mysticsmb 07:09:00 PM Nov 10 2007

burljeand 08:35:55 PM Nov 09 2007
WHAT THE GOVERNMENT DOES NOT KNOW IS SOME OF US WILL NOT GO INTO RESTAURANTS AND SO ON WHERE MANY GAYS ARE HIRED. WHO CAN RISK GETTING AIDS?

Guess you'll be starving, then. Bet there isn't a single restaurant that doesn't have gay employees.

speakupspeakloud 10:36:06 AM Nov 10 2007

rdariusxxx: Christains forget what they where doing before Jesus came in their life. Most of them where having problems. Now they don't want others to join in. Doesn't the holy spirit have anything to do with their change from Gay to un-gay? Churches will take in drunks, streetwalkers, homeless, poor, and rich. If I was gay, I would biuld my own church and prise the Lord and forget all this forgiven, holy, and Goddly people. I don't think God give a damn who is praising his name.

1 - 10 of 3429
3429 comments

Add your own Comments

Top Videos

News Bloggers

Ada Calhoun
  • Ada Calhoun
  • 02/10/10 12:00 AM by Ada Calhoun
Dinesh D'Souza
  • Dinesh D'Souza
  • 02/10/10 12:00 AM by Dinesh D'Souza
Mo Rocca
  • Mo Rocca
  • 02/10/10 12:00 AM by Mo Rocca
Ben Greenman
  • Ben Greenman
  • 02/10/10 12:00 AM by Ben Greenman
The Young Turks
  • The Young Turks
  • 02/10/10 12:00 AM by The Young Turks