Find, view and share videos about news and entertainment from around the Web.
See Videos »

Blog Chatter

NEWS ALERTS

Get the latest updates sent straight to your inbox.

Sign up to receive AOL News alerts by e-mail.

Ritter's Widow Disputes His Treatment

By LINDA DEUTSCH,
AP
Posted: 2008-02-05 10:34:31
LOS ANGELES (Feb. 5) - More than four years after his death, John Ritter's relatives are taking their $67 million lawsuit to trial Tuesday, claiming the actor would have survived if two doctors had recognized his heart abnormality and not treated it as a heart attack.

The procedure for treating a heart attack is the "exact opposite" of what a patient with Ritter's condition would have undergone, according to legal papers filed by lawyers for the plaintiffs.

"One would imagine that having a doctor treating you would increase your chances of survival rather than decrease them," said lawyers for Ritter's family.

Defense lawyers say that Ritter's condition - aortic dissection, a tear in the aorta - mimics a heart attack and that the doctors did nothing wrong.

The trial, which begins with jury selection Tuesday in Superior Court, is expected to delve into radiology scans and the world of emergency medicine, where split-second decisions can mean life or death.

Hollywood will be a subtext during the trial, with executives slated to testify about how contracts are negotiated and how much Ritter might have earned if he continued with his hit TV show, "8 Simple Rules ... For Dating My Teenage Daughter."

Ritter's second wife, Amy Yasbeck, and his four children have already received a reported $14 million in settlements with nine other medical entities, including the hospital where he was treated.

They are suing radiologist Matthew Lotysch and cardiologist Joseph Lee for negligence. The doctors said they did nothing wrong.

Ritter, a beloved comic performer and the son of Western star Tex Ritter, was 54 when he died in September 2003 after being taken to the emergency room from the set of his sitcom.

Yasbeck Talks to 'Today'

Lotysch had performed a full-body scan on Ritter two years before his death and found no abnormality in his aorta. The plaintiffs say he should have noted that Ritter's aorta was enlarged. Defense experts expected to testify will dispute that the aorta was enlarged at the time.

Lotysch's lawyer, Stephen C. Fraser, said the radiologist found calcifications in all of Ritter's coronary arterieact opposite" of what a patient with Ritter's condition would have undergone, according to legal papers filed by lawyers for the plaintiffs.

"One would imagine that having a doctor treating you would increase your chances of survival rather than decrease them," said lawyers for Ritter's family.

Defense lawyers say that Ritter's condition - aortic dissection, a tear in the aorta - mimics a heart attack and that the doctors did nothing wrong.

The trial, which begins with jury selection Tuesday in Superior Court, is expected to delve into radiology scans and the world of emergency medicine, where split-second decisions can mean life or death.

Hollywood will be a subtext during the trial, with executives slated to testify about how contracts are negotiated and how much Ritter might have earned if he continued with his hit TV show, "8 Simple Rules ... For Dating My Teenage Daughter."

Ritter's second wife, Amy Yasbeck, and his four children have already received a reported $14 million in settlements with nine other medical entities, including the hospital where he was treated.

They are suing radiologist Matthew Lotysch and cardiologist Joseph Lee for negligence. The doctors said they did nothing wrong.

Ritter, a beloved comic performer and the son of Western star Tex Ritter, was 54 when he died in September 2003 after being taken to the emergency room from the set of his sitcom.

Lotysch had performed a full-body scan on Ritter two years before his death and found no abnormality in his aorta. The plaintiffs say he should have noted that Ritter's aorta was enlarged. Defense experts expected to testify will dispute that the aorta was enlarged at the time.

Lotysch's lawyer, Stephen C. Fraser, said the radiologist found calcifications in all of Ritter's coronary arteries and told him to follow up with a cardiologist.

"He did no follow-up," Fraser said, noting that Ritter also had very high cholesterol.

Lee was the cardiologist summoned to the emergency room at Providence St. Joseph Medical Center in Burbank after Ritter was taken there complaining of nausea, vomiting and chest pain. Plaintiff's lawyers say a chest X-ray should have been performed before Lee treated Ritter.

The doctor's lawyers say that there wasn't enough time for that and that a chest X-ray ordered earlier inexplicably was not done. They say Ritter's symptoms were more consistent with a heart attack than anything else and had to be treated quickly.

"He did not have classic aortic disease," Fraser said. "He never described excruciating pain."

Lawyers for the family declined to discuss their case, but they said in legal briefs that experts will testify that Ritter would have survived longer without treatment for a heart attack.

Attorney Michael Plontsker said the family intends to use proceeds from the lawsuit to establish a foundation to educate the public about aortic dissection disease.

Copyright 2008 The Associated Press. The information contained in the AP news report may not be published, broadcast, rewritten or otherwise distributed without the prior written authority of The Associated Press. All active hyperlinks have been inserted by AOL.
2008-02-05 08:27:32
Bookmark

Recent Comments

1 - 10 of 329
329 comments

olbear70 01:34:33 PM Feb 11 2008

I had an AAA like John Ritter's on the same day in 2003. Due to excellent care by nurses and doctors at a small-town hospital (Montrose. CO Memorial Hospital) I survived. My personal doctor in Denver had diagnosed it as a hernia. The Montrose emergency room people got it right and saved my life.

pjjones1028 05:25:23 PM Feb 07 2008

I noticed in the article they said that Ritter never expressed excrustiating pain as a symptom... My mother had a aortic dissection 5 years ago and luckily survived. She said she never experienced alot of pain when it happened, just that she felt weak all over and dizzy. Said the pain was very minimal

muayboxe@aol.in 09:48:46 AM Feb 07 2008

Life can't be measured in terms of MONEY! PERIOD
Sorry wont cut it, neither will pathetic pay-offs. The culpable culprit must PAY the same amount as he-she would make had they been alive! Now take that to the court.

mkline2090 09:32:06 AM Feb 07 2008

an accident. How much $$$ does this greedy ________ need?

whirlygig 07:06:36 PM Feb 06 2008

Doctors are not God, keep in mind that they are 'practicing' medicine and don't preform miracles

moemoe4537 04:57:23 PM Feb 06 2008

she is a dr in which state?

skydiveliz 03:13:06 PM Feb 06 2008

Unlees you have been throught he pain and agony......you have no right to comment...you haven't been their you don't walk in the shoes. The system dictates the rule we as victims have to play by them

skydiveliz 03:11:06 PM Feb 06 2008

They are responsible for giving back what they took financialy and Mr riters potential ernings were great and if some who makes 30,000 per yr is a victim they owe his potential earning for his lifetime. People who make 30K it should be relaced peoplewho make 100K it should be relaced, people who make millions it should be replaced this is how they live and they should continue to live that way.

skydiveliz 03:04:17 PM Feb 06 2008

My malpractice suit for my husband was clear cut, the staff doctor that all residents answered to went forward and we had them cut and dry. You as a doctor as they were, are responsible for ruining my family, my children and 11yrs later they deal with every life event without their father. The biggest thing I wanted was responsibility and accounabilty and you are responsible as doctors to give back the only thing you can and that is the continued lifestyle they had. I found out early on that this process of a lawsuit had nothing to do with me or my children, it had to do with Money.....Doctors Lawyers established the game....I Played by the rules they or the system established. You won't come forward and say I am so very sorry......... you use everything you can to save a dime...I hope you are proud.

grtmd 12:36:57 PM Feb 06 2008

Report This! I am a physician who treats these conditions and from the description of the case it was a missed diagnosis, but one that is very difficult

clroberta 03:00:50 PM Feb 06 2008

What a pathetically greedy society that we have. We think that everything is suitworthy. Dissecting aortic aneurysms are notoriously difficult to diagnose and have very high mortality rates. It is sad that he died, but this does not constitute malpractice. We all suffer when these types of frivolous lawsuits are filed. She should take the very large sum of money that she has already extracted and engage in grief counseling.

1 - 10 of 329
329 comments

Add your own Comments

* Want the latest Hot Seat polls delivered to your Vista desktop? Hot Seat Vista Gadget »

Top Videos

News Bloggers