Blog Chatter

What are tags?

List

Feed

Top stories submitted and voted on from Propeller.

mauriceargent on Obama says music fueled civil rights movement
cramon511 on Primera dama emprende campaña contra obesidad infantil en EEUU
JaneRey4u on Venezuela salvó del colapso al Caribe: Fidel Castro
cramon511 on Venezuela: Chávez decreta emergencia eléctrica
grogrounds on 5 Tips for Retaining Key Employees

Get the latest updates sent straight to your inbox.

States Crack Down on Dangerous Dogs

By IAN URBINA,

The New York Times

Posted: 2007-07-23 12:08:19

Filed Under: Law News, Nation News

RICHMOND, Va. (July 23) - Bear is a golden retriever-shepherd who attacked a bicyclist. Dee Dee, a pit bull mix, killed a cat. Cody, a Labrador mix, bit the neighbor.

Their mug shots, misdeeds and home addresses went online this month at the Virginia Dangerous Dog Registry, a new Web page modeled after the state’s sex offender registry. It lets residents find dogs in their county that have attacked a person or an animal, and that a judge has decided could cause injury again.

Robyn Beck, AFP / Getty Images

In many areas, breeds like pit bulls have been banned. Now Virginia has a registry for dogs considered dangerous.
More Coverage: How States Respond to Attacks

Created after dogs killed a toddler and an 82-year-old woman in separate incidents in the last two years, Virginia’s registry is part of a growing effort by states to deal with dogs deemed dangerous. Thirty-three states and the District of Columbia hold owners legally liable if their dogs maim or kill, and in 2006, Ohio became the first state to enact a breed ban, though it was later overturned.

In the last two years, nearly 100 municipalities have taken similar steps — banning pit bulls, Rottweilers, English bull terriers and American Staffordshire terriers, or passing regulations that require owners to use muzzles or short leashes in public, according to the American Kennel Club.

Last month, Texas responded to a November 2005 mauling death of a 76-year-old woman by enacting some of the harshest criminal penalties for delinquent dog owners, making it a felony with a possible 10-year prison sentence for anyone whose dog seriously injures a person while off its leash.

But lawmakers taking steps to deal with growing concerns have struggled to ensure public safety without impinging on the privacy and property rights of dog owners. Several of the measures have been overturned in the courts, and many national dog owner and veterinarian associations say the bans are difficult to enforce and ineffective since, they say, if one breed is banned, dog owners seeking aggressive dogs will simply begin fostering fierceness in other breeds.

After the indictment of the Atlanta Falcons quarterback Michael Vick, who is accused of running a dog-fighting ring from his property in Virginia, the Humane Society estimated that more than 30 percent of dogs in animal shelters were pit bulls, many of them trained as fighting dogs and later abandoned on the streets. That is up from 2 or 3 percent of the shelter population that were pit bulls 15 years ago, the officials said.

“Of course it’s a serious concern when you have more people wanting and training aggressive dogs, and more of those dogs are being abandoned,” said John Goodwin, an expert on animal fighting with the Humane Society.

Feed

More Stories

Counties in Florida and New York have also created publicly accessible dangerous dog registries like the one in Virginia, and legislators in Hawaii are considering one. Critics of the registries say that by publicizing the home addresses of dangerous dogs, they invite harassment by neighbors and invade the privacy of dog owners. Seventeen states now have a “one bite rule” protecting dog owners from liability for the first attack.

“It seems a little unfair to single out a dog if they haven’t done something in the past,” said Jacqueline Short, 40, who lives in Newport News, Va. She is Bear’s owner and says the bicyclist was her pet’s first biting offense.

Now that Bear has been officially designated a dangerous dog, he must be muzzled and walked on a short leash when he is taken in public. But Ms. Short says the toughest requirement has been the $100,000 liability insurance that she now has to carry, which costs about $1,000 a year.

“Courts need to look at the dog’s history and the severity of the incident,” Ms. Short said, “and if the dogs haven’t shown aggression in the past then that should be taken into account before they are considered dangerous.”

Even with stiffer penalties, animal control departments are often understaffed and under-financed and therefore unable to apply the laws.

“Leash laws don’t work because they’re not enforced,” said Mary Hill, the sister of Lillian Stiles, who was killed in Texas in November 2005 by a pack of dogs and whose death inspired the state’s law.

Ms. Hill, who likes to exercise regularly, said she was often frustrated by dogs left off their leashes that chase and harass runners and walkers.

Each year, roughly 4.7 million people are bitten by dogs and about 800,000, half of them children, seek medical attention, according to the Centers for Disease Control and Prevention.

On average, a dozen people die each year from dog attacks, according to the center. In 2003, 32 people died from dog-related incidents.

From 1979 to 1998, more than half of the dog-related fatalities were caused by pit bulls and Rottweilers, according to a study published in 2000 in The Journal of the American Veterinary Medical Association.

Randall Lockwood, a senior vice president of the association and one of the authors of that study, said it was a mistake to make policy decisions based on dog-related fatalities, because they are so rare.

“In the ’70s, Dobermans were the scary dogs of choice, and they were involved in more fatalities,” Mr. Lockwood said. “And later, German shepherds and St. Bernards used to be the ones involved in attacks, which is probably why Stephen King chose to make Cujo a St. Bernard, not a pit bull.” Fatalities are, above all, a reflection of the type of dog that is popular at a given time among people who want to own an aggressive status symbol, he said.

Pit bulls have undoubtedly become that symbol in recent years, and communities that have tried to ban them have run into problems. At least 12 states prohibit local municipalities from passing breed-specific legislation, according to the National Conference of State Legislatures. Critics say the bans are costly and impractical to enforce since breeds are often difficult to identify and dogs are often of mixed breed.

In March 2006, Ohio’s law banning pit bulls was overturned on the grounds that the state could not prove that pit bulls were inherently more dangerous than other breeds.

In Virginia, 75 to 100 dogs have been declared dangerous by a judge, and many of them have been euthanized or moved out of state.

But victims say the insurance is actually the most important part of Virginia’s new law.

Betty Greene’s mother, Dorothy Sullivan, 82, was killed by a neighbor’s three pit bulls that entered her yard. Ms. Greene said she had heard from a number of victims of dog attacks who, more often than not, ended up having to pay for their hospital bills.

The three pit bulls were euthanized and the owner was sentenced to three years in prison for involuntary manslaughter, Ms. Greene said.

“There is no way to explain the grief,” she said. “It’s even worse when the victim has to pay for the lawyers, the death, the hospital bills.”

2007-07-23 07:26:44

Read Related Blogs and Articles

Must Read?

86 %

14 %

0 VOTES

Recent Comments

Post Your Own

1 - 10 of 2319

2319 comments

ndakota1234 11:54:55 PM Aug 03 2007

Report This!

I hate it when people blame the dogs, it's not their fault on how they were raised. If they had been raised properly they would not have this problem of them attacking people and other animals. People are to blame- if an animal is mistreated day after day, then when they get freedom they will eventually attack their abuser. Just like us as humans do. I personally have 3 shepherds that I have raised from pups and they have never had any kind of training- only love, plenty of food and nurishment and alot of companionship from our family. And I would trust them with my life.

Lmaddox2610 11:19:49 PM Aug 03 2007

Report This!

Register the owners - not the dogs. Dogs act according to their treatment and training. If you see a "bad dog" you can be sure the animal has a "bad owner". A dysfunctional owner will cause an animal to be defensive and agressive. It should be a criminal offense to mistreat an animal and put the public at risk and jeopardize the life of the animal. If the owners have no respect for the community in which they live and society in general, there is no reason why we should feel we owe them any consideration or respect in any way.

linluvsanimals 04:13:36 PM Jul 26 2007

Report This!

Sorry Mlltny, pets just don't go nuts like that for no reason. Could even be a physical reason, but you can bet there is a reason.

tduponts 06:07:57 PM Jul 25 2007

Report This!

I agree that its not the dogs, its the owners that are responible. I had a male rottie that was 160 lbs. When my son was born the 2 were inseparable. That dog never ever once seemed to be mean. We treated him like he was a part of the faimly. My son used to get on him and ride around the house and if anything would have triggered him to be mean it would have been when my son used to put his fingers in his mouth and pull on his flappers but that never happened becasue the dog was loved very much and treated very good. So I believe it stems from the owners when dogs attack and the owners should be held responsible. I don't like to hear that Rotties are dangerous dogs becasue its not true. I aslo believe that the smaller dogs are more prone to attack people than the bigger dogs. I've heard and seen that the smaller dogs are more prone to snap and attack other dogs and humans than the bigger dogs.

tduponts 06:07:54 PM Jul 25 2007

Report This!

tduponts 06:07:53 PM Jul 25 2007

Report This!

leeswillow 10:43:56 AM Jul 25 2007

Report This!

MLTNY...I have a few questions about your experience with your pittie. I am sorry you were hurt by the dog but...
Do you know where the dog came from?
Did y ou meet the parents of the pup?
Well was it a pup when you got it?
The reason I ask these questions is that like ANY breed of dog, you need to know the background of the dog. Parents, health, temperament, etc. There are too many out there that breed just for the money made on the pups. My pittie pup is 11 months old now and I had her spayed a 7 months. You should have heard the rants and raves I got for that decision. Rednose pit pups in my area go for $800-$1000 each. I had to question that as Rednose is breed standard so there The only dog I know of that was ever bred to be human aggressive is the Doberman and it was bred to hunt tax evaders in Germany. We all know that most failed miserably at being aggressive and these days those are not culled from the pack. Thank you God. They too are great dogs. ALL dogs must have

leeswillow 10:43:26 AM Jul 25 2007

Report This!

MLTNY...I have a few questions about your experience with your pittie. I am sorry you were hurt by the dog but...
Do you know where the dog came from?
Did y ou meet the parents of the pup?
Well was it a pup when you got it?
The reason I ask these questions is that like ANY breed of dog, you need to know the background of the dog. Parents, health, temperament, etc. There are too many out there that bree just for the money made on the pups. My pittie pup is 11 months old now and I had her spayed a 7 months. You should have heard the rants and raves I got for that decision. Rednose pit pups in my area go for $800-$1000 each. I had to question that as Rednose is breed standard so there is nothing rare about it. I made the decision because I do not litter and I may change that opinion the day I can walk into a shelter, pound, etc and there is not a dog sitting and waiting to die. Not one. I think that people forget these animals were tamed so they could be useful to us. The only

leeswillow 10:28:01 AM Jul 25 2007

Report This!

Look as the person owned by my APBT and Shep/Rott/Chow/Hound mix, I will say that the only dog to EVER inflict harm on me was a Toy Poodle and I ended up with 27 stitches. I have been removed from a injured area of a pitbull by his mouth. No damage done. The poodle was aggressive. I have worked with many different breeds of dogs and have never been bitten by any dog that people are attmepting to put into a "dangerous" breed catagory. The media ran with Dobermans in the 70's, and Rott's in the 80's. Sheps and Rotts, shared the evil spotlight for awhile and now the target is Pitbulls. I know this breed and they are not vicious dogs. They are not human aggressive. Many do have animal aggression and that is something a responsible owner will already be aware of. You must provide housing for any dog, and it must suit the animal and it's tendencies. Aussies/Shepherds herd, and will do so to the newest member of the family as they are learning how to walk. It is just an instinct t

todmoonalice 07:17:00 AM Jul 25 2007

Report This!

African Americans make up about 12% of the US population, but according to this FBI report (2005) they are responsible for 32.7% of the rapes, 48.6% of the murders, and 56.3% of the robberies in this country.

They have turned every major city in this country into uninhabitable hell-holes with their guns and drugs.

Maybe if they stayed in school, got jobs, stopped having babies they are unable to support, and stopped acting like animals, they might earn some respect from civilized society.

Then again, maybe they are just incapable of it.

http://www.fbi.gov/ucr/05cius/data/table_43.html

1 - 10 of 2319

2319 comments